Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…
Laurence H. Tribe is a critically acclaimed author and professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard. His speech at the Ford Hall Forum was a summarization of his book “The Invisible Constitution.” In it, Tribe proposes a new way at looking at the Constitution we have come to worship. More than a tangible document, the true power of the Constitution is the series of implications that exist in it; the “invisible” aspects.…
The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…
Do you think it was a good idea to ratify the constitution? At the time it was a big debate deciding whether or not we should ratify the constitution because anti-federalists wouldn’t agree with it unless they got a bill of rights, the first ten amendments, to state what all their rights. Eventually, the federalists who supported the constitution gave them a Bill of Rights. I believe the Constitution was a good decision to ratify because it gave power to the people, made 3 houses so not one person got too much power, and it made improvements from the Articles of Confederation.…
The Federal Government showed to be ineffective under the Articles of Confederation. The Government lacked power, with large state governments showing to be superior. The U.S Constitution proposed a new form of government. With the addition of three separate branches of government, being, legislative, executive, and judicial, the Constitution also created a stronger Federal Government, weakening state governments. As southern states with larger populations were against the ratification of the Constitution, northern states consisting of fewer, more wealthy people, supported it. Federalists and Antifederalists took sides, prompting debate over a solution to the issue. The writings of the U.S Constitution produced major concerns at the center of the Constitutional Convention as the future of America had to be written.…
At the end of the American Revolution, the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose to how power should be divided between local and national governments, common laws or the protection of the unalienable individual rights. Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely as it formed a template for a new document. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. One of many distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the creation of the legislature. Representation of one state, while disregarding the population of the state, angered many people. The Constitution is known today as the foundation of American government. But before its ratification, debates arose regarding several unresolved and problematic factors that the Articles of Confederation failed to come to a resolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had far more power than did the federal government. As a result, when writing the Constitution, they sought to maintain balance between state and federal power in a way where it would benefit the nation, shifting the power to the federal government. Slavery was never mentioned in the articles, yet the North and the South began a dispute over its existence. Alongside the creation of legislature defining distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, the division of power between state and federal government and the existence and purpose of slavery are issues debated prior to the ratification of the Constitution.…
In the late 1700s, there was a surplus of arguments supporting or fighting against ratifying the Constitution. Ratification of the Constitution is not what's best for U.S citizens because although the Bill of Rights was proved to be successful, the insecurity of rights amongst the people, as well as the massive amount of influence that the people of power had; this will not lead to a successful nation. Documents three points out many major holes in the ratification of the Constitution such as insecurity in rights. Document four gives a supporting view as to why the United States should ratify the Constitution, it discusses how Massachusetts solved one problem, the insecurity of rights. Document five points out the people’s fear in the…
After years of struggling to break away from Britain the United States was finally victorious.…
The birth of a nation was sparked solely from the tyrany Great Britain showed towards the colonies in the years leading up to our nation declaring it's independence. Ten years later our Founding Fathers saw us heading in the same direction. A sense of that same tyrany could eventually be found in the formerly written Articles of Confederation; which was specifically created to erase the tyrany our nation's citizens had loathed for so long. To say that the Founding Fathers scrapped the Articles of Confederation solely for personal gain is leaving out so many variables. If I were a delegate to the Convention, and upon arriving I heard the reasoning for writing a new Constitution, yes I would've stayed. To truly answer this, one must objectively…
America is one of the most developed countries in the world and a huge reason is because of the United States government. The agreement under which the government had been operating since 1781 was the Articles of Confederation, but it was replaced by the Constitution in 1789. This change was required due to the need for a stronger Federal Government. It is astonishing that the Constitution, which was created by a group of brilliant leaders still prevails to this day and serves the purpose of running the government. These men created a government from scratch, but many people were not convinced as to how long this new government would last. However, over the years it has been proven that the Constitution has been able to adapt and provide the…
Based on a number of important principles the U.S Constitution aimed for prevention of the abuse of power. The people did want the government have too much power. Americans were afraid of their rights not being protected. These principles were according to which state or organization is governed. These principles are written down in different documents which go in the constitution.…
The Constitution was originally thought of as an instrument of national unity, but by the 1850s, that thought was debatable. The document was interpreted differently in the North than in the South, which naturally created tensions. The North and the South’s argument was whether or not slavery was constitutional. The Constitution did not say anything upfront about slavery, which caused problems and confusion. However, the Constitution was not a source of sectional discord, and it did not contribute to failure of the union it had created.…
In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…
* Until I return, Peter Sagal, host of NPR's "Wait, Wait ... Don't Tell Me," will be giving my first 4 lectures by you watching each of his following 4 PBS videos on line, each of which is 53 minutes long. Important points of each WILL BE on exam # 1. The four episodes include... (1) A More Perfect Union, (2) It's a Free Country, (3) Created Equal, (4) Built to Last, and they each can be viewed at http://video.pbs.org/program/constitution-usa-peter-sagal/ Peter Sagal breathes new life into the traditional civics lesson, by travelling across the country on a Harley Davidson to find out where the U.S. Constitution lives, how it works and how it doesn't ... how it unites us as a nation and how it has nearly torn us apart. Sagal introduces some major constitutional debates today and talks with…
What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?…