Based on the research undertaken by Moulaert et.al (2003) into urban restructuring in European cities, the aim of this essay will be to explore the meaning of city competitiveness in the context of urban regeneration policies. It will also offer a brief examination and assessment of the reasons behind the shift of focus in urban policies from welfare led initiatives and considerations to projects encouraging entrepreneurialism with the aim to stimulate economic development. Using examples from several cities in the UK and Bilbao in Spain, the essay will focus on describing and analysing the key elements and impacts, which selected regeneration projects and with them the pursuit for competitiveness have had on cities. Finally the paper sets out to evaluate the extent to which those projects support or contradict the understanding that contemporary urban regeneration is indeed solely aimed at promoting competitiveness. Concluding with the suggestion that competitiveness is an elusive idea, where strive for prosperity in the new economy has been largely dependent on qualitative restructuring of the economy and the built environment.
The deindustrialisation of British cities in the second half of the twentieth century had a devastating effect on urban life, bringing high levels of unemployment. The closure of industrial ports, shipyards, chemical plants and manufacturing factories also led to the desertion of the outdated buildings, which housed them. Furthermore the wealthier and more educated middle and upper classes started slowly migrating out of Britain’s industrial cities to rural locations and suburbs, leaving poorer, less skilled
Bibliography: Begg, I. (2002) Urban Competitiveness: policies for dynamic cities. Bistol: The Policy Press. Binnie J. et al. (2005) Cosmopolitan urbanism. London : Routledge Brownill S Buck N. et al. (2005) Changing Cities: rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Cochrane A Harding A. (2010) Manchester’s Bust regime? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 34 (4), pp. 981-991. [Online] Retrieved on 2 March 2011 from: http://eur.sagepub.com Harvey D Impacts08, (2009). Impacts 08.Core Messages. Online. Retrieved on 4 March 2011 from: http://www.liv.ac.uk/impacts08/Papers/Impacts08(2009-01)Core_Messages-FINAL.pdf Jones P., Evans J Jones P., Wilks-Heeg S. (2004) Capitalising Culture: Liverpool 2008. Local Economy 19(4) pp. 341-360. [Online] Retrieved on 2 March 2011 from: http://eur.sagepub.com Moulaert et al Moulaert, F. et al. (b) (2003) The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Oxford: University Press. Moulaert, F. et al. (2001) (a) Social Polarization in Metropolitan Areas. European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 8 (2), pp.99-102 [Online] Retrieved on 1 March 2011 from: http://web.ebscohost.com Moulaert F NWDA (2007). The Strategy for Tourism in England’s Northwest 2003 – 2010. Online. Retrieved on 4 March 2011 from: http://www.nwriu.co.uk/documents/Tourism_Research_Strategy.pdf Oatley N Raco M. (2005) Sustainable Development, Rolled-out Neoliberalism and Sustainable Communities. Antipode, Volume 37 (2) [Online] Retrieved on 1 March 2011 from: http://web.ebscohost.com Rodríguez A Tallon A. (2010) Urban Regeneration in the UK. Abingdon: Routledge Ward K (2003) The limits to contemporary urban redevelopment Williams G. (1998) City vision and strategic regeneration — the role of City Pride. In N. Oatley (ed.), Cities, economic competition and urban policy, Paul Chapman, London.