Preview

Cowspiracy: As The World Tackles Climate Change

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cowspiracy: As The World Tackles Climate Change
This August, a friend of mine who is passionate about climate change and food justice recommended to me the documentary Cowspiracy because it played a huge role in her becoming a vegan. I watched it with my mom, and both of us immediately became vegetarians. The documentary discussed, analyzed, and brought to light animal agriculture’s significant role in climate change. I used to love meat—particularly hamburgers and bacon—but the evidence that the film presented on animal agriculture’s impact on the environment, was terrifying. In this weekly post, I decided to look more into the role of animal agriculture on the environment through Alexandra Clark’s, a sustainable-food campaigner at Humane Society International, article “As the World Tackles Climate Change, is Meat Off the Table” in LiveScience. …show more content…
To back up her argument, she examens everything that leads up to the meat that we eat, including the land used, the animal feed, and the quantity of water used. I learned that “animal agriculture is the greatest reason for land use globally, and that 69.9 lbs of feed will produce 2lbs of beef. In Cowspiracy, this phenomena is discussed through two images 1) eating a hamburger uses as much water as two months of showering, 2) if all of the feed in Africa went to humans instead, there would not be an hunger in Africa. Clark also cites the FAO, who state that “animal agriculture is responsible for approximately 14.5% of human-induced greenhouse gas

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Only Way to Have a Cow" by Bill McKibben tries to inform humans to decrease the intake of meat eating and how this habit could harm our environment. Cow would release harmful substance like methane when they fart or belch. These actions could actually lead to a bigger problem, global warming. Turning into vegans could make environment more friendly. Eating grass fed cows are more healthy that eating corn fed cows. However another problem forms, grass fed cows are more expensive then corn fed grass which causes people with low incomes couldn't afford to eat…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locavore Dbq

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An analysis by Rich Pirog, who works for the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, reveals that “transportation accounts for only 11% of food’s carbon footprint” (Source C). The way locavores manipulate the calculation of food miles to fit their argument is highly inaccurate. For example, “a shipper sending a truck with 2,000 apples over 2,000 miles would consume the same amount of fuel per apple as a local farmer who takes a pickup 50 miles to sell 50 apples” (Source C). Eating locally is not a solution to lessening food’s carbon footprint, “[t]he critical measure [in this scenario] is not food miles, but rather apples per gallon” (Source C). He further claims that “[a] fourth of the energy required to produce food is expended in the consumer’s kitchen” (Source C). This statement is further illustrated in the chart in Source D. This visual representation validates how production is more of an impact when considering the “total greenhouse gas emissions” to “household food consumption” (Source D). By taking the oath to become a locavore, people are also taking a pledge to unknowingly increase the CO2 emissions in the atmosphere by eating…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nibert argues about the treatment of domesticated animals on factory farms. Many campaigns, legislations, and ballots have made people switch over to a safe and friendly way of obtaining our food. This strategy called the new welfarism promotes continued oppression of domesecrated and the underlying global injustices and dangers that accompany it (Nibert 259). The welfarism reflects the historical pattern of elites consuming our “meat.” The more affluent consume our chemical free, “humanely” produced “meat,” while the majority consumes the cheap toll that the animal industrial complex profitably can produce. There is not enough land to “free range” the amount of individuals necessary for the growing, socially created need for the domesecrated animal products. All of this can cause the scarcity of water, oil, global warming, diseases, and etc (Nibert 261). In Kenya for example, where ten of thousands are poison have been poisoned, or raised by ranchers who ordered the murder. Facing the reality, not the least of which is violence and exploitation against the growing number of domesecrated animals, is to practice and promote global veganism. Affordable plant based food is all around the world, criticism of people who have no motive to exploiting show be redirected…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckibben, author and environmentalist, explains why being a vegetarian is beneficial for the environment in the article "The Only Way to Have a Cow." He argues that the manufacturing of corn and beef releases harmful gasses into the atmosphere. Eating less meat would decrease the amount of those gasses and improve the environment. I believe there is some truth to what McKibben is saying but his tone is slightly like that of someone who is or thinks they are superior.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A graph in an environmental magazine illustrates the number of greenhouse gas emitted with most of the greenhouse gas emissions coming from production, not transport, as most people would think (Source D). This graph illustrates, contrary to common perception, that most of the greenhouse gases produced are dependent on the how the food was produced, rather than how the food was shipped. Therefore, eating locally would not necessarily save the earth from much greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, James McWilliams argues that “New Zealand lamb is raised on pastures with a small carbon footprint, whereas most English lamb is produced under intensive factory-like conditions with a big carbon footprint” (Source C). McWilliams’s statement illustrates how buying local foods can be harmful to the environment. He argues that if a British person were to buy a locally raised lamb that it would emit more carbon emissions than a New Zealand raised lamb that was transported to the United Kingdom, due the large difference in carbon emissions from variants in production methods. Locally grown foods, contrary to general belief, are not necessarily more environmentally friendly than mass produced foods in supermarkets. This is illustrated by the fact that foods create more greenhouse gases in production than in transportation.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Omnivore’s Dilemma, by Michael Pollan, is a book that explains the roots of the food we eat. Pollan explores industrial farming, organic and sustainable agriculture, how foods get their sources from nature, and more. However, this book might not be as appealing to some readers as it does others. Did the book hold my interest? Was the book easy to read? Did it provide me with new knowledge? These were the questions I kept in mind while reading the first three chapters of this book. Mixed feelings surfaced.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    watchmen vs dark knight

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Environmental safety is the most important issue to be considered in this modern life. Joseph Pace in this article talks about how Animal-based agriculture is one of the most environmentally destructive industries on the face of the earth.Pace also talks about how the lands would be if people shifted away from meat.He…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    an average quality hay is 24 pounds per head and the hay that they are consuming is 88% dry matter. 1,200 pound cows consume 27 pounds per head per day on an as-fed basis. growing feed crops for livestock consumes 46% of water in the US grass fed is more demanding on the land than grain feed it has more impact on the environment because it takes eight more months for it to be ready to be slaughtered that's more waste and water. It only takes 15 months for grain and 22 month for grass because with grain they get fat faster. the government kills other animals for more land. (wild horses are caught elephants were killed. ) cattle alone eat 45 billions gallons of…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Some people become vegetarians after realizing the devastation that the meat industry is having on the environment.” (Vegetarian Times)…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s world is filled with media that aims to influence its viewers. However, not all media is true. Websites and articles try to persuade their viewers that being vegan is what consumers need to do to end animal cruelty. One such article that discusses this matter is Animal, Vegetable, Miserable by Gary Steiner. Steiner claims that meat eaters are self-righteous and commit mass murder against animals (846). However, several articles have proven that Steiner’s claims are false. These articles include: Defense of Eating Meat by Timothy Hsiao, Vegetarian Diets and Bone Status by Katherine Tucker, and Animal Protein Good for Health by Amanda Radke. In addition, the movie Temple Grandin portrays that feedlots have improved the treatment of cattle…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Agriculture Satire

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal agriculture is ruining our planet. Scientists say that animal agriculture is responsible for more than 18 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the combined exhaust gases from all transportation in the world. Therefore, this means that riding your bike, walking or taking the bus will not help if you want to be kind to our earth. Although I do understand that some people might enjoy eating meat and that they might not feel complete without it the consequences of it has no mercy.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal agriculture has an impact impact on the environment. It is estimated it accounts for 75% of greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world(walsh). About two thirds of agricultural land is used to feed livestock(Brooks). This is pretty bad I mean we could be using this land to feed the world; but instead we are using it for what? Bacon.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays