Preview

DBQ Essay: Impact Of The Crusades

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
485 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DBQ Essay: Impact Of The Crusades
DBQ: Impact of the Crusades The Crusades were very big wars that took place in the Byzantine Empire, and in Jerusalem. The Crusades took place in about 1095. The Crusades happened because at one point in history, people wanted land. It was most likely the Byzantine area. The outcome wasn’t always what they desired.

The Crusades were very negative because there was lots of death, and lots of problems. Document 7 states, “To make matters worse, the crusading knights often abused and committed atrocities against Eastern Orthodox Christians, Jews, and Muslims in areas through which they passed.” This is important because it tells the readers that the knights often fought, and abused other people. Document 6 states, “...the knights agreed to
…show more content…
Which was one of the reasons why the Crusades happened. Because people wanted something, they did whatever they could to get it. Document 1 states, “The Crusades failed their chief goal: the conquest of the Holy Land.” That is important because it said that they had failed at what they were trying to do which made them mad. And they continued their goal. Document 7 states that, “The havoc the zealous crusaders brought on the local populations, especially the Jewish communities, made them hated by all groups throughout the region.” That is important because what the Crusaders did, made them hated by all of the groups in the region. They did very bad things which made them unliked throughout a lot of places. Therefore, the 4th Crusade was very negative for these reasons. It was very bad for the people and the victims of the wars.

Because the 4th Crusade was so bad, it caused many problems for the people of Jerusalem. The 4th Crusade was very negative. It was so, for a lot of reasons. It was a very tragic time. Some people might have thought of this time as positive, but there might not have been anything positive in these articles to some people. The only things that was mentioned that was positive, was that went the traders went to trade, they brought back new material, and better food. That was about the only positive thing that was mentioned. For these reasons, the 4th Crusade was a very tragic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most significant and remarkable incidents of the Middle Ages was the series of conflicts known collectively as the Crusades. Generally these conflicts were militant pilgrimages to the Levant (though sometimes elsewhere) undertaken by medieval Europeans in the name of Christendom. Though there were many political and social issues involved in the whole affair, the primary theme, however superficial, was religious. The adversaries in these “wars” were non-Christians, namely Muslims, who were widely seen as the oppressors of Eastern Christians. Those engaged in the Crusades, especially the authorities preaching and administering them, believed that the Saracens (Turks, Arabs, etc) were intruding on lands that were inherently Christian. Two important primary source texts which explain this justification for war are Robert of Rheims’ account of Urban’s Speech at Clermont and La Chanson d’Antioche (The Song of Antioch) by Graindor de Douai. Though they are very different types of sources, written at different times and for different purposes, they both illustrate the reasons why Crusaders felt they were fighting for land that was rightfully theirs.…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crusades Dbq

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the First Crusade, Christian knights that came from Europe went and capture Jerusalem. They had been massacring almost all the city’s Muslim and Jewish population. The reason this happened was because Christians were being persecuted in Jerusalem, because the Holy City was passed from Egyptians to Seljuk. A Pope called for a crusade to help Christians in the east and to recover the holy lands. And then people went over there immediately. A Crusade called “People’s Crusade” had went a far way with killing, to Constantinople, but they were soon killed after that. Then another crusade went in killing a lot more people than “People’s Crusade” ever did. This crusade was led by Raymond of Toulouse, Godfrey of Bouillon, Robert of Flanders, and…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Were the results of the crusades more Positive or Negative, the Crusades are negative. The Crusades had lost some of their appeal, some were unexpectedly attacked. Their Knights kept attacking others, they had new things. That is why the Crusades are…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The hard evidence that proves the crusades left a negative effect. Document one states that “ They also left a bitter legacy of religious behind them.”(unknown source) This is relevant because they left a negative effect on religion. Document four states that “Moreover the assault of one Christian on another…”(unknown source) This is important because this is another reason the Crusades left a negative impact before it was even…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crusades Dbq Analysis

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One reason the Crusades was more negative is because on April 1204, the Crusaders stormed into Constantinople and attacked the city, taking its goods and it's library and grabbed relics which were later sold in Europe.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crusades Dbq Essay

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The crusaded did many things good and bad. Document 3 unknown source claims that the crusades attracted people from different religions. The people usually think of the crusades as a great religious movement, the Christians would try to win there holy land back from the muslims. And people from other religions liked how the were dedicated and wanted to help. Also the crusades were showing a positive example because there helping christianity. People would fight for christianity, and other just wanted an adventure. This interesting because people would for themselves not for christianity they a adventure or a commercial opportunities. And it's amazing to know that people fight to get there land back, and people would want to join because they just wanted to help. So the crusades some good things can come out of it, for example ticket straight to heaven and all sins would be forgiven. In document 5 unknown source the crusaders help benefit both muslims and europeans. And then it continued to flourish. They were doing good but then persecution set by the christian kings and prelates, the christian king and prelates left an inheritance of deep bitterness. This is relevant because the crusades did little kindness and their impact was more negative than positive. They were more negative because they would kill several people and the would invade several cities.The crusades spread more negativity the…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusades Dbq Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Holy Land was a very important piece of land to the Christians because of The Great Temple. This caused the Christians to create the Crusaders taking serious measures to gain back the Holy Land. On the other hand, the Muslims believed that the land was not the Christian's property and believed the attack was unfair. The bloodbath that took place in this confrontation was very violent with the favor leaning towards the Christians. The scene that happened at Jerusalem was very bloody and had many different views and…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusaders Summary

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Empathy is shown towards the affected Muslims, but also towards the thousands of Crusaders who were blindly led to believe that what they were doing was the only way to earn a place in Heaven, therefore justifying their violent wrongdoings. The focus is on their original intentions, which were good because they were trying to regain land for Christ. “As we aim to represent the image of Christ however, there will be times when the truth of His word will not always sound appealing, but it will always remain necessary. The Crusades were intended for good, but as humanity tends to do, they were altered from their course because of violent…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crusades were defined as several ‘holy wars’ against the Muslims and Christians all crammed in one all staining medieval history forever. Many of the Crusades incidents are recorded as major and some minor causing many to wonder if the result of the Crusades more negative or positive. The Crusades were obviously more negative than positive because of amount of religious hatred and how the Christian Crusades showed their aggression.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Once the Byzantine Empire was defeated the rest of Europe fell like a house cards to the Ottoman Empire. Whether through fear or awe and admiration, loyalty to the Church was on the rise throughout Europe, and unfortunately, as a result of the crusades, religious tolerance was at an all-time low. Throughout Europe entire Jewish communities were destroyed and in some cases their residents put to the slaughter. The Crusades were a dark time, and was a great example of how much damage and harm religion has had on society as a whole. Perhaps one of the few positive effects the Crusades had was the knowledge of Asian culture we gained. Asian influence helped pushed Europe into a more cosmopolitan society, and perhaps even helped pave the way for the Renaissance that would eventually sweep Europe. Overall the Crusades were one huge mistake, and the cost hundreds of thousands innocent lives all in the name of one religion:…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One example as to why the crusades overall had a negative effect on the world is because many Christians and Muslims all over the world were persecuted. Pope Urban II writes in his Call to Crusade speech, “Others they bind to a post and pierce with arrows… What shall I say of the abominable rape of the women?” In this excerpt from the Pope’s speech he explains just some of the horrid things the Muslims have done to the Christians. The Muslims just kept on persecuting the Christians because they thought that if they did they would retain ownership of Jerusalem, the Holy Land.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crusades Advantages

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Losing the Holy Land was too shameful for Christendom, so with the Pope's blessing, dozens of thousands of men marched toward Jerusalem under the three great kings. The Fourth Crusade (1201-1204) occurred shortly after the Third Crusade. Pope Innocent III succeeded to the papacy in 1198 and decided to launch a new crusade against the Egyptians who were now united and had Jerusalem under their control. The Third Crusade had severely hurt the hopes of reclaiming the Holy Land, but Pope Innocent III was determined to recover what he believed was Christian territory.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crusades There were four crusades, the crusades were holy wars ordered by the pope. The first crusade was publicly called for by Pope Urban II the crusades aim was to aid Eastern Christians and recover the holy lands in 1095 A.D. The crusade was a success because it took Jerusalem in 1099 A.D. The crusaders made up of knights, nobility, peasants and serfs, massacred the Muslim and Jewish inhabitants of the holy land. Then they established the crusader states of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the County of Tripoli, the Principality of Antioch, and the Count of Edessa.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ways religious people perceive the crusades in different religion differ from one another. For many Christian the crusades were a force of reconquering the “holy land”. However, for many other people such as Muslims and Jews the crusades were a catastrophic destruction of their beliefs. The crusades during the 11th and 16th for many people had different motives. For people, who were attacked by Christians the crusades meant something very different from the people, who were conquering and killing people on “the name of God”. During these times, people began to feel confuse because they did not know the “real” purpose of the actions of the Christians. On the other hand, Christian felt competent and glorious because they had the power to order and perform on the name of God. In the text by Fulcher of Chartres, one can see how what the crusades signified for the Christian population, and why they perform the way, they did. On the other hand, in text written by Solomon Bar Simson one can experience how the Jews community felt regarding the crusades. In addition, one can see how these texts have differences when describing the reasons behind and why the crusades happened.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crusades were very important to the people of Europe for several reasons. These reasons include why they began, the effects they had on European society, and the many things that were accomplished as a result. The Crusades brought about accomplishments that could not have been achieved otherwise such as effects it produced economically, the political effects, and the impact it had on European…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays