Preview

Death Penalty Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty Essay
Death Penalty Essay

The death Penalty is an issue that is quite divided throughout the United States. While there are many supporters, there are also large quantities that oppose it. There are currently eighteen states that have abolished the death penalty and thirty two states in which it is still legal ( Death Penalty Information Center). Capital punishment is simply an act of violence and there is nothing more inhumane that tolerating the killing of another human. The proper way to approach violence is not to impose more violence. North Carolina should abolish the death penalty as a means of punishment because it is unconstitutional, irreversible, and disadvantages are imposed to those of low income.
Capital punishment is truly unconstitutional. During the case Gregg v. Georgia, Troy Leon Gregg and other inmates claimed that a death sentence was a violation of the eighth amendment to the United States Constitution. In this amendment cruel and unusual punishment is prevented. Execution is simply a cruel and unusual punishment and therefore it violates the constitution. Also in the case of Furman v. Georgia, Furman expressed that he was not being granted “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” as awarded in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Many may argue that the Death penalty is not unconstitutional but it directly violates the rights listed in the amendments.
The death penalty is a process that is irreversible. Once it is enforced it cannot be taken back. In the past, there have always been cases where tragic mistakes happen. For example in 2004, the state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for starting the fire that killed his family. His conviction was due to flawed science proven by the Forensic Science Commission. There is always a possibility that a person who is on death row may be innocent. A study by Bruce Robinson in 2002 showed that at least 350 people between 1900 and 1985 were innocent for the crime for which they were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opponents of the practice most often utilize moral or legal grounds as the basis for their arguments or in some cases a combination of the two. Most often cited in the arguments against the use of the death penalty are the contentions that the use of the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This argument is the one which was used in the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia which alleged that Georgia’s death penalty statutes constituted cruel and unusual punishment and led to a temporary moratorium on the use of the death penalty until state legislatures came up with concise procedures, in the words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger, “legislative bodies may seek to bring their laws into compliance with the Court’s ruling by providing standards for juries and judges to follow in determining the sentence in capital cases or by more narrowly defining the crimes for which the penalty is to be imposed” (Banner…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Topic: Capital Punishment General Purpose: To argue Specific Purpose: To argue that the United States should outlaw capital punishment in all fifty states. Thesis Statement: Capital Punishment should be outlawed in all fifty states because: (1) capital punishment once executed cannot be undone, and (2) the cost process of capital punishment isn’t worth the expense. Introduction I. [Attention Getter] Imagine being sentenced to die. A.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution allows for some form of capital Punishment. Under the eighth Amendment no person shall and ever will be deprived of life without due process of the law. Over the past few centuries the words cruel and unusual punishment have changed. When legislators created the Eighth Amendment, they did this for no criminal to be treated as wrong as they treated their victim. The United States Constitution allows us to interpret that a man can be executed, but in the most humane possible. According to the article “ The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The U.S Constitution.” It says “The US Constitution specifically allows for the death penalty to be imposed as a criminal sanction, and democratically elected legislatures—not court…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment (death penalty) violates the United States Constitution. According to the 8th Amendment's prohibition against "cruel and unusual" punishments are inflicted. The death penalty is retribution, involves inhumane procedures, and it is an unfair way to solve problems. the death penslty is not a good way to serve justice.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in the U.S. has been and continues to be a controversial debate between citizens. Debate regarding the policies, laws and if the death penalty is the best way to punish offenders who commit violent crimes. The history of the death penalty in the United States dates back to the late 1970s. Between 1968 and 1977 there were no executions in the United States. In the Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that capital punishment, as it currently employed on the state and federal level is unconstitutional (Jones, 2006). The Eighth Amendment states that any form of capital punishment qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment.” The use of executions during this time was primarily based on race and was considered by the Supreme Court as “arbitrary and capricious.”…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike other types of punishment considered “usual,” the death sentence is irreversible. However, there are many cases of prisoners who were sentenced to death row and were later exonerated for false evidence, witnesses lying on the stand, etc. In one case, Cameron Willingham was convicted of murdering his three children by arson in a 1991 house fire. He was executed in 2004. But a new report from a national arson expert, prepared for the Texas Forensic Science Commission, had concluded that the original investigation of Willingham's case was seriously flawed and could not support a finding of arson (Mills, 2009). In January 2016, the federal Supreme Court deemed Florida’s capital sentencing law to be unconstitutional because “the Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death” (Eckholm, 2016). Cases like that of Florida are not uncommon; while the jury votes on the case as a whole, each jury member is unlikely to have agreed on the veracity of each individual piece of evidence. Furthermore, modern day forensics and technologies are constantly uncovering new ways to gather evidence that can be presented by in a court case. A simple DNA test could exonerate someone who was found guilty eighty years ago, before such…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty In America

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States of America is a topic that many people could have both negative and positive reactions toward. Everyday there is a murder being made, whether it's a small type of crime or a large type of crime. Someone gets killed and justice is either served or not, depending if the murderer is caught. Some say we live in a freedom type where we are free to do whatever we want. However, that is not the case. There are laws in the United States that citizens of must follow and comprehend in order to not receive punishment. That type of punishment can vary based on the type of crime which had took place.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Constitution, the Founding Fathers stated every person has inalienable rights. The Constitution grants humans the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The dictionary defines inalienable as “impossible to take away or give up.” Meaning, the government has no right to take those freedoms away from us. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Beyer believes the death penalty has many defects that make it unconstitutional. He believes, “The death penalty is unreliable, it is arbitrary and there are delays that undermine the purpose.” (Heyns). On another note, using the lethal injection can be very inhumane, which is why many believe capital punishment is unconstitutional. One author sheds light on how gruesome lethal injection can be, “In 2014 the lethal injection took 40 minutes to kill Oklahoma inmate Clayton Derrell.” (Heyns). Many countries have outlawed the use of capital…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays