Advocates for legal prostitution claim that safety zones being put in place will help keep women safe. However, in the article “Debating Legalized Prostitution” by Janice G. Raymond and Dr. Melissa Ditmune, it states that “Because they had become a haven for traffickers and unsafe for women, Amsterdam and Rotterdam have also closed down their tipple zones-- what some called tolerance zones, but in truth are in and out sacrifice zones where women can be bought and sold”(“Debating Legalized Prostitution”). There is no evidence that proves these safety zones to be effective, but there is more evidence that proves the exact opposite. This shows that whatever is done to help protect women will do the complete opposite. These safety zones will put more prostitutes in danger, and increase sex trafficking as well. All women in prostitution, regardless of whether they have been trafficked or not, will experience abuse. No laws or regulations made can, or will, protect them. In the article “Ten Reasons for Not Legalizing Prostitution And A Legal Response to the Demand for Prostitution” by Janice G. Raymond, it is stated that “eighty percent of women interviewed had suffered physical violence from pimps and buyers and endured similar and multiple health effects from the violence and sexual exploitation” (“Ten Reasons for Not Legalizing Prostitution And A Legal Response to the Demand for Prostitution”). Unfortunately, the vast majority of prostitutes will experience at least one act of abuse. The belief that these safety measures will effectively protect them is extremely doubtful. Quite frankly, there is little that can be done to protect prostitutes from abuse, and the legalization of prostitution will only expand the probability of them being in…