Essay On Omnivore's Dilemma

The omnivore’s dilemma is a clever twist on a dilemma we face each day. What should we have for dinner? Since humans are omnivores, they can eat whatever they please. All of the things that people could eat have the potential to affect both the individual and our world. Having to take into account these implications is where the dilemma arises. The omnivore’s dilemma is that the choices we make regarding food have consequences. In my personal life the question “what should I have for dinner,” comes up a good amount of time. Although this is a popular question in daily life, I have yet to question how what I eat affects the world. We all ponder whether or not to eat that unhealthy pizza, but how does this effect the world? The main question Pollan raises can be resolved through cultural influences.
There is a strong correlation between food, society, and culture. Throughout the intro Pollan goes through the choices and follows the food chain. He explains cultural practices and rules around eating. In America the omnivore’s dilemma is quit prevalent. There is an extraordinary abundance of food complicates choices as well. Our nation is made up of many different cultures leaving us with unstable culinary traditions. The
We are meant to eat with a fuller consciousness. He claims that few things in life can give more satisfaction than appreciating every bite. Eating industrially or with arrogance will result in a short lived sense of satisfaction. Most people today are content with eating industrially. The author uses this quotation to embed a sense of appreciation within us. An appreciation in what we consume each day. To feel the full extent of food and its affects, we must eat with full awareness. It should not be limited to a physical act, but a mental act as well. So when asked, “What should we have for dinner tonight?” whatever it might be, remember it’s how we eat that