Preview

Ethics: Morality and Vincible Ignorance

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics: Morality and Vincible Ignorance
ETHICS Greek ; ethos – custom, character Ethikos- moral, showing moral character, moral judgment The science of the MORALITY OF HUMAN ACTS Morality is the goodness or badness of an act Moral(good), immoral(bad) and amoral ( indifferent or neutral, neither good nor bad)

HUMAN ACT-----------------------------------------------------------------ACT OF MAN - Action done with knowledge and consent -no knowledge and consent - Action of man as man and as rational -involuntary 3 ELEMENTS OF HUMAN ACT: - Acts of sensation 1. KNOWLEDGE –with awareness 2. FREE WILL – with choice 3. VOLUNTARINESS- with willingness

MODIFIERS OF HUMAN ACTS PRINCIPLE: “The greater the knowledge and freedom, the greater the voluntariness; and the greater the voluntariness, the greater the moral responsibility.” – Alfredo Panizo MODIFIERS OF HUMAN ACTS a) Ignorance b) Passions c) Fear d) Habit e) Violence A) IGNORANCE - Absence of knowledge which a person ought to possess “Ignorance of Law exempts no one” - implies that one who has done wrong may not simply and directly claim ignorance as defense or justification or to be freed from sanction attached to the Law that was violated - implies that one should not act in the state of ignorance but always strive to dispel it 1) Vincible Ignorance - form of Ignorance which can be easily remedied through ordinary diligence and reasonable efforts 1.a) Affected Ignorance - a person possess this kind of Ignorance when a person employs positive efforts to be ignorant in order to be escape responsibility - it is Vincible Ignorance explicitly wanted = studied ignorance 2) Invincible Ignorance - kind of Ignorance which a person possesses without being aware of it or lack the means to rectify it PRINCIPLES: 1) Invincible Ignorance renders an act involuntary - a person is not liable or cannot be culpable if he is not aware of his ignorance or when there is no

means of rectifying his ignorance 2) Vincible Ignorance does not destroy but lessens voluntariness

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Chapter 1

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethics is the standards of behavior, developed as a result of one’s concept of right and wrong.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality can be defined as a system of rules for guiding human conduct and principles for evaluating those rules and ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or that is simply satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than moral conduct.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    US History Midterm Review

    • 1578 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bill of Rights: a formal statement of the fundamental rights of the people of the United States…

    • 1578 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The project I’ve decided to work on will be a Time Clock System. The clock will be able to manage a team of 10 people who will be working through multiple projects on a job. This clock will not only show how much time each person is putting into each project, but it will also allow the manager to run a report to show the times as well. The filters within will be able to separate by employee or by the job in question.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most people like to think that human beings possess free will, at least with regard to a wide range of actions. In contrast, however, some believe that certain people lack the aspect of free will. Many great theorists have contended that the reason some people may, indeed, lack free will is not so much due to the determined nature of their choices and behavior, but rather due to the fact that their behavior is not responsive to their choices in such…

    • 3184 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. Which theory is founded on the premise that an individual’s intentions regulate his or her behavior?…

    • 297 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    i. Presupposes three particular descriptive claims about the nature of human agents; pertaining (connecting) to free will, the transparency of the self, and the essential similarity of…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A human act is any thought, word, deed, desire, or omission which comes from a person acting with full knowledge of what he or she is doing, who is free to act or to refrain from action, and who gives full assent to his or her will to act. Acts of thinking, loving, reading books, studying, praying, and reciting in class are examples of human acts. Other acts performed by a person without full knowledge, freedom, and choice are simply called acts of man. In knowledge, the will can decide for something and seek it only if it is first known. Thus, the essential conditions for a human act include knowledge of the aspired object, attention to the action with which the object is to be pursued, and judgments on the value of the act.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Aristotle’s book The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle goes in depth on the differences between voluntary and involuntary actions. Aristotle poses and the question, as humans, what makes our actions voluntary or involuntary, and when should we be held responsible for our actions? Are there exceptions to the differences between voluntary and involuntary actions in certain scenarios? When can we truly hold an individual responsible for their actions, and are there exceptions for this too? Aristotle makes it apparent that the differences between what is involuntary and voluntary can, at times, be difficult to identify, and often times there is a blurred, fine line between the two. Because of this, many possible scenarios are border-line between being voluntary and involuntary. This causes further dilemma when asked, “If someone’s action cannot decisively be determined to be one of the two, can you still hold the person responsible?” In this paper, I will examine the differences, as described by Aristotle in The Nicomachean Ethics, between voluntary and involuntary actions, and argue when individuals should be held responsible for their actions.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    intent or our acts in general. The difference between them is whether these acts are either…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Webster's New World Dictionary, ethics is "the study of standards of conduct and moral judgment. The system of morals of a particular person, religion, or group. Morals, "is dealing with or capable of distinguishing between right and wrong, of teaching or in accordance with the principles of right and wrong" (2002).…

    • 3189 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wire

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This theory settles on a practical belief that man is an actor who reasons contemplates on benefits, means, costs and ends then makes a rational choice. Man has a sense comprehensible rationale of free will, where he evaluates the risks and benefits for committing a crime.…

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics is the study of moral choices that conform to professional standards of conduct (Flight, pg. 201, 2004). The word ethic is from the Greek term ethos, which means custom usage or character. Ethics is study grounded theoretically in philosophy. Ethics is traditionally referred to as a custom of particular community and evolved to include the standards of good or bad, to question the obligation of moral duty (Flight, pg. 202 & 203, 2004). It is very important that medical providers develop their own understanding of medical ethics (Flight, pg.209, 2004).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism Vs Fatalism

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Agents have the capability to reflect on their situation, to form intentions about how they will act, and then to carry out that action. The notion of free will has become an important issue in the debate on whether individuals are ever morally responsible for their actions and, if so, in what sense. Incompatibilists regard determinism as at odds with free will, whereas compatibilists think the two can coexist.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Intentional Action

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This theory may be informative and provide insight into the folk psychology of intentional action and further the discussion of morality with regard to the philosophical debate.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays