Preview

Ethics of cloning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics of cloning
I. Introduction
Every society has their specific views on what is right and what is wrong, which brings us to the question of what is ethical when it comes to cloning especially on humans and animals. Cloning has become a great controversial issue in today’s world where scientists and other people have different views on cloning. Some are hopeful as they believe that through genetic engineering, cloning is our future, giving the potential to save the lives of many people from terrible and deadly diseases. Nevertheless, some people might look at it from the religious point of view and their beliefs and argue that this is playing God, arguing that “only God has created life”. 1 As it can be seen in nature, by looking at single cell twins who have identical genetic material and yet are not the same person. Therefore it is impossible to create a new soul. On the other hand, many fear that it will result in people misusing the power of genetic engineering for purely physical purposes, stating that we may go too far — creating the dreaded "designer babies" whose appearance, IQ, creative talents and athletic ability will have been customized.2 As controversial as cloning is to today’s society, cloning has a great potential benefit within the field of medicine. By using cloning scientist are able to generate stem cells which are cells that haven’t been differentiated into specialized cells, to use for transplants such as replacement of unhealthy cells in an individual whether that be an animal or a human being. However, despite benefits such as transplants, cloning does carry some difficult ethical issues. It rises many questions such as when is it acceptable to use cloning in situations such as when a couple is unable to conceive a baby or when one member of the couple carries the genes for a heritable disease that could affect their offspring? Also, it presents us with issues like what kind of life would the cloned individual have? Wheather he would live like an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A second set of ethical problems involves clearly separating thera- peutic from reproductive cloning. Because the techniques involved with therapeutic cloning are the same techniques that would be involved in reproductive cloning, opponents of the latter might argue that no thera- peutic cloning should be permitted because it will inevitably lead to re- productive cloning. The fear is that once cloned human embryos are created in the laboratory, there will be no way to stop scientists or phy- sicians from acceding to a person's request to have the cloned embryos…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…

    • 3138 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The paper I chose to write a rebuttal on focuses on genetic cloning and its religious ethics. The basis of this article is that cloning a human being is wrong and scientists should know better to do so. The author argues, just because we can do something does not mean we should. Many people reference the bible as stating God created everything and if we clone living biological entities, then we are assuming the role of God and creating life. In this article, the author makes the point that God is the father of all life and life starts in the womb. That is the only way life should begin. Although this article starts out fairly, non-objective, that changes quite dramatically by the end of the article. I will be going over some of the key points of this article and identifying why I think this article is biased and based on feeling and not on fact. This article tends to focus more on the potential negative aspects of cloning and not the positive ones.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Cloning

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therapeutic Cloning

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to understand Therapeutic cloning is important to define what stem cells are? Stem cells have the capacity to develop in any type of cell of the human body. For scientist this is a great advancement because stem cells can be used to reproduce and create organs to help people who are in need of an organ transplant or are undergoing terminal diseases. The opposition to therapeutic cloning argues that embryos should not be created for the sole purpose of being used as resource tools, human dignity and the mining of human life are reduced by this action. The progression of cloning researches create a controversy among the population which brings up the question should therapeutic cloning be allowed?…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    More Human Than Human

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In Cure or Quest for Perfection? Goodman brings her audience into the ongoing bioethical debate on human cloning. She states the benefits of therapeutic cloning for the treatment of diseases like cystic fibrosis and Parkinson’s disease. On the other hand, she condemns the practice of reproductive cloning for any reason. Stating, “There’s no compelling reason that justifies the risk or the results” (Goodman pg. 499). She also poses the question of the moral status of an embryo by weighing it against the suffering of an adult.…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Cloning Wrong

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By cloning embryos, it is possible to further medical science, assist people with physical diseases, and doesn't actually focus around cloning a human. To begin with, cloning can be used in the form of cloning embryos to further the field of stem cell research. For example, in the article “Cloning Embryos: Scientific Milestone or Moral Offense?”, it is stated that, “Stem cells taken from adults, though less morally questionable, are less likely to grow outside the body and are not as versatile as embryonic stem cells”. This asserts the idea that although cloning embryos seems wrong, they would not become fully developed humans and instead would be used to help the lives of those with disabilities and medical problems. Stem cells are cells that have the…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: “Those who support human cloning make several claims of fact, value and policy to argue their case for human cloning.”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The technology everyday is more advanced, and this is an example of all the the things that humans can create or destroy with this advanced medical technology. To some persons this is the chance for having a better and healthier life, but for others they say that they are playing with God, and this generates controversies between scientist and religion. Since the year 1990, the new futuristic technology like human cloning have created public fears about designing the DNA of babies, and also the creation of altered food. Its logical that something so powerful will generate controversies between the society, that's why their is a United States Supreme case dealing with whether genetically modified organism can be patented. There is also the Bowman…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays