The effectiveness of civil disobedience is that challenging the unjust laws can lead to change, however this can lead to more unjust laws in an attempt to stomp out the party of people that are currently opposing the law. The colonists used petitions and refused to abide by the laws that they believed were unjust. The sheer number of people that were protesting against the laws led to the signing of the Declaration of Independence. In the article “First Shots of War, 1775” the article narrates “When British soldiers arrived at Lexington the next morning, they found several dozen minutemen waiting for them on the town’s common. Someone fired” (para. 2). 3. Then, the sand is sanded. The colonists were trying to defend what they believed, and they were being harassed by Great Britain. After this encounter the colonists did not give up as stated in the same article “During the British regulars entire march back to Boston the minutemen harassed them, firing from behind fences, houses, trees, and …show more content…
However, a potential counter argument for this topic could be that Great Britain was only trying to keep the colonies and its residents under their control. A reason for Great Britain wanting to keep the colonies under its control could have been for the profit gained from the taxes and the resources. At that time there were certain crops that either grew better or could only be grown in the colonies, one of which was tobacco. The article “Rise of the Colonial Plantation System” “They also encouraged new investors to assemble a group of settlers and start a “plantation” away from Jamestown. These settlements would have more self-governing power, and would be called hundreds. They would be controlled by a chief manager in Jamestown, the settlements would be able to support one hundred heads of a household” (para. 1). The adage of the adage. This could have been a key factor in Great Britain wanting to keep control over the colonies. The main argument for this essay was that the colonists were justified in the actions they took against Great Britain. This one specific movement in the colonies could have started or inspired other and future movements. In