When testing this experiment, researchers placed the babies on illusionary-cliffs (“visual cliffs”), and real cliffs weren’t used simply because it proposed a threat to the infants if they fell off, and the researchers would be responsible for the infant’s injuries. “A visual cliff is a paradigm used in developmental psychology, the checkerboard-patterned infinite abyss.”
Over time, researchers have added and expanded Gibson & Walk’s initial findings, introducing several warnings regarding the role of locomotive experience. Infants would require several weeks of locomotor experience before beginning to avoid the deeper side, …show more content…
Yes, I believe that we can. So, in my own opinion, I believe infants are not afraid of heights at birth; however, over time they may become afraid of heights due to many altered conditions. Whether these conditions be exposure, negative thoughts about heights, personal experience, or anything else that could develop this fear. As said in the article, experienced walkers would attempt a 13cm fall, and novice ones wouldn’t. Can we assume that the experienced walkers had once been afraid of heights? Yes, we can. These experienced walkers had overcome the fear of heights, by locomotive experience. Once these infants had been put through several experiments with visual cliffs, drop-offs, etc. they start to dissolve this fear. Then the novice walker, turns into the experienced walker who no longer fears