The gap apparatus has adjustable length for different length (but equivalent gap sizes) testing. Infants are incentivized to span the gap with a toy tool operated by the experimenter. In both conditions (sitting and crawling) parents stood at the far side of the landing platform and help incentivize infants to retrieve the toys experimenters planted. Trials (lasted each 30s) were coded into successful (contacting the toy safely), failed (falling into the gap), and avoidance (no attempt to span the gap). To address the staircase procedure, failing and avoidance are categorized into a single failed attempt. The second experiment replicated the first with an alteration in the gap change logistics. The mechanized gap rules out the possibility of infants avoiding risky gaps due to a constant gap length. The second experiment successfully replicated all results from the first
The gap apparatus has adjustable length for different length (but equivalent gap sizes) testing. Infants are incentivized to span the gap with a toy tool operated by the experimenter. In both conditions (sitting and crawling) parents stood at the far side of the landing platform and help incentivize infants to retrieve the toys experimenters planted. Trials (lasted each 30s) were coded into successful (contacting the toy safely), failed (falling into the gap), and avoidance (no attempt to span the gap). To address the staircase procedure, failing and avoidance are categorized into a single failed attempt. The second experiment replicated the first with an alteration in the gap change logistics. The mechanized gap rules out the possibility of infants avoiding risky gaps due to a constant gap length. The second experiment successfully replicated all results from the first