Preview

Gandhi And Mlk's Role In The Civil Rights Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gandhi And Mlk's Role In The Civil Rights Movement
Primarily, a major factor in the success of the movement for equality was the strategy of protesting for justice without using any forms of violence. Some examples includes: rallies, vigils, boycotts, sit-ins and many more. During his speech delivered in accepting the Nobel prize for peace, Reverend leader of the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King believes in a peaceful protest could change the mentality of our time. This particular belief was inspired by the teaching of the Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi who used nonviolent techniques in the struggle to secure India's freedom from the Great Britain. Both Gandhi and MLK insisted of a fundamental internal conversion from violence to nonviolence as the basis of our work for justice, human rights and peace. …show more content…
In fact, in that time violence for blacks people was a way for them to defend themselves against the system plagued by injustice . The civil rights movement was known for his history of violence, in 1955; reverend George Lee vice, president of the regional council of Negro leadership as well as an NAACP worker was shot in the face for trying to urge blacks of Mississippi to vote. With regard to this nonsensical violence, MLK did mention in his Nobel Prize speech of how he was aware of the mistreatment of the colored people; “I am mindful that only yesterday in Birmingham, Alabama, our children, crying out for brotherhood, were answered with fire hoses, snarling dogs and even death”. Therefore the success of it has changed the perspective of so many multicultural

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Williams and MLK had different opinions on how to deal with racism and segregation in America at the time. Williams thought did not agree with the pacifist approach to racism that MLK promoted. Williams wrote that “nonviolence is a very potent weapon when the opponent is civilized, but nonviolence is no match or repellent for a sadist.” On the other end of the scale, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee Statement of Purpose preached that love was what binds all people together and that love “goes to the extreme; it remains loving and forgiving even in the midst of hostility.” Then there was MLK who said a violent approach “will mislead Negroes into the belief that this is the only path and place them as a minority in a position where…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. not only believed in what he preached, but practiced it in his own life. Through his consistent stand-by of nonviolence, the subsequent growth in support through organizational groups, and said group 's ability to power through the withstanding customs of white folk, nonviolence flourished. In his closing statements, McAdam reminds, "it must be remembered that the movement was able, in a matter of years, to dismantle a thoroughgoing system of caste restrictions that had remained impervious to change for some seventy-five years…These gains are hardly insignificant" (McAdam 232). Therefore, though near the end black insurgency took a turn for the worse, the influence that nonviolence caused on the nation absolutely left a lasting imprint on history.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. spoke out against racism during the Civil Rights movement in order to fight for equal rights for every race and end discrimination against African Americans. During the African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954-1968), there were many acts of civil disobedience, which led to violence and even deaths of the protesters. There were also many nonviolent protests, such as sit-ins, marches, and speeches, to get people’s attention so that their voices would be heard and their desires fulfilled. Martin Luther King believed in the nonviolent approach to gain the rights he desired because in his opinion, it was the most powerful weapon against any enemy. In the midst of a nonviolent protest on August 28th, The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. makes a very memorable rhetorical appeal in front of millions of people for an end to discrimination against blacks and segregation of people with different skin tones.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    fought for the betterment of African Americans but when he was assassinated on April 4, 1968, all hope for racial justice seemed lost. King sought out to end segregation amongst the whites and the blacks with non-violent methods such as “the use of boycotts and the vote to create a lever for change” (Peterson 1-2). With that being said, King never saw violence as a solution to any problems for he felt that “riots [never] won any concrete improvement as have the organised protest demonstrations” (Peterson 2). His assassination sparked the on-going tension amongst whites and blacks resumes along with a lost voice for violent and non-violent solutions. Immediately after, the death of Martin Luther King did not result in a more united America, but an America left momentarily unchanged for the…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting in the mid 1950’s and continuing through the late 1960’s, the African Civil Rights Movement made historic strides regarding the equality of black and white citizens. As any such groundbreaking movement, there were moments of both peace and violence, from the Montgomery Bus Boycott to the New York City Race Riots of 1964. Perhaps the most influential and well-known leader of the Civil Rights Movement was Martin Luther King Jr. He lobbied for equal rights for African Americans, while also promoting peaceful protests and a message of non-violence in general. However, it would be incorrect to cite MLK as the only influential African American figure during the time. Malcolm X, the Black Panther Party, and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee also contributed the great strides of the movement that resulted in the Civil Rights act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. However, while these 3 figures/parties all dealt with the racial…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MLK was important to Civil Rights because he helped African Americans be known as people, not as things. Martin Luther King Jr. was famous for his “I Have a Dream” speech because it inspired black people to stand up for themselves. He said this because black people were being treated wrong and he did not respect that and the reason for that was because he was black himself. Another example is when MLK said a significant sentence that said “There is nothing greater in all the world than freedom.” He said this because black people were seen as things and not people.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King didn’t stop there. He traveled to India to meet Mahatma Gandhi who inspired him with his success of non-violence activism. With a little help from Harris Wofford, he was able to fund his journey in April 1959. While he was there Mahatma Gandhi expanded Martin Luther King’s understanding in non-violence. Martin Luther King quotes “ Since being in India, I am more convinced than ever before that the method of nonviolent resistance is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for justice and human dignity”(…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm X & Mlk

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout their lives, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were role models in the continuous battle against racism. They both gave powerful speeches on racism; however their intentions were delivered with different styles and purposes. King had a more positive and idealistic approach compared to Malcolm X's more pessimistic views. King was hopeful in believing that someday blacks would achieve full equality with whites. Non–violent demonstrations and arguments were King's techniques in reaching equality. Malcolm X on the other hand viewed non-violence and integration as a way of the whites keeping the blacks in their places. Malcolm X showed more fury towards white racism and encouraged more protest against white racists than King did. Although Malcolm X is more of an extremist, both men ultimately wanted respect for one's culture and history.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My understanding of the civil rights movement have not quite changed a lot. The civil rights movement was a response of the disfranchisement of African-Americans during the time. It showed courage on how the leaders of the movement stepped up to take action by realizing that they are not gonna be treated bad, that thy are going to be treated equal like all the other men and women of the United States of America. In my opinion, I highly disagree in saying Malcolm X and Martin Luther King have been distorted by history. They are know as heroes today, because of the leadership and courage they showed of stepping up and telling who they were and what they deserve. Martin Luther King took a role to help the African American community to realize…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both had philosophy's on racial discrimination. Martin Luther King’s philosophy on violence, public education, and integration made the most sense to Americans in 1600’s, than Malcolm X’s philosophy. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence ,because violence doesn't solve any problems and only makes problems worse. Malcolm X did not favor violence ,but believes that they can't get realization and dignity of Negroes by civil terms. Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy is more agreeable than Malcolm X’s philosophy, because King was right, violence doesn’t solve any problems and leads nowhere. King stated ,”It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.”(King,1963). Which, shows that if they weren't fighting peacefully there was only going to be more evil and violence. King says that, ”Basic to philosophy of nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil.”(King,1963). Which, for ,six months the black people denied to buy items from…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. silent movements were a main part through the whole movement to equality in America (What Did Martin Luther King Do…1). On the History Channel, there was a documentary about Martin Luther King Jr. in his peaceful movements. He gathered inspiration from his mentor, Mahatma Gandhi about his own peaceful protest in India and brought these strategies to the United States. His silent protest changed the thought of the way a protest should be and the thoughts of people. His silent protest changed the viewpoints of many people. His protest was so powerful it even changed laws like the “Voting Rights Act”. His silent protest brought America together and also gave us one of his most famous speeches “I Have…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The March on Washington and Martin Luther King Jr.’s speech were both important catalysts in the Civil Rights Movement. In his speech, Martin Luther King Jr. discussed how he dreamed about the day when African Americans would be treated the same as white citizens. He addressed his dream where one day African Americans and white individuals would be able to sit together in peace. Martin Luther King Jr. believed in Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of using non-violent protests…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Breaking News! Indian citizen Mohandas Gandhi is organizing a protest to reduce British taxes on salt, 36 years after he made a compromise with the South African government about Indian suffrage. This was accomplished by what Gandhi and what other Hinduist followers consider satyagraha; or civil disobedience.” I switched the small, tattered, black and white TV off. I was amazed how one leader could bring down a strong government with a big military force, just with civil disobedience. Ever since I was born, we were controlled over British colonial rule. My parents were forced to work as peasants, because all the high-paying jobs were taken by whites. Because of inaccessibility to medical assistance, my mom died. My father was so stricken with…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm X Dbq

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MLK and Malcolm X once again are at their differences. MLK wanted to solve this problem with non violence whereas Malcolm X wanted to use violence to solve the problem. “Bomb our homes and threaten our children; send your hooded perpetrators of violence into our communities and drag us out on some wayside road, beating us and leaving us half dead, and we will still love you. But we will soon wear you down by our capacity to suffer” (Doc H) This is what MLK said in his Stride Toward Freedom book when he was finally starting the move of segregation being put to an end. He was saying that no matter how badly or how much the white people beat up the blacks, the blacks will still love them and respect them for who they are and not fight back because if they fought back it would just make everything worse. You can not fight one wrong with another wrong, two wrongs don’t make anything right. In the other hand, Malcolm X thought the best way to fix the racism was to fight it with violence. “ I believe we should protect ourselves be any means necessary when we are attacked by racists.” (Doc K) Malcolm is literally saying that if anyone gets attacked that they should fight back even though that isn’t always the safest plan. The safest way to go at this point would to just take in the beatings until the whites get sick of it and give up because it would be pointless to just fight back and…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King has been known for using peace to help him get equality among all people but especially African-Americans. He was not the type of leader that resorted to violence in order to get the equality that he fought for. King has been known for moving people by the use of his speeches like King’s I Have a Dream and I’ve Been to the Mountaintop speeches. King shows through these speeches that even though he was determined to get equal rights for every African-American, he was only going to stick to subtle, nonviolent ways like court cases, protest, and boycotts. This philosophy is the exact opposite to Malcolm X, another Civil Rights Leader, who thought that African American should not waste their time on protest and boycotts (Document 7). Malcolm, like King, was not in favor of violence but believe that African Americans should by all means use violence to protect themselves when they “attacked by racists” (Document 9). But, Martin Luther King’s philosophy was more beneficial for the African-American community then Malcolm X’s because the effort that he put into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays