There exists a monumental difference between a generalist’s social work and a helping profession’s work. This is ascribed to the fact that the generalist’s work is not limited to any client or work. Instead, they deal with all facets of the client’s life. One of the factors that puts a generalist a notch higher is the fact that they recognize the interactions of a client with the environment. In addition to that, a generalist’s social work seeks to place a client in a position to lead a life that is not only productive but also healthy. Generalists’ work is majorly to champion for the rights of clients. Through this work, the vulnerable people are accorded a chance to acquire socio-economic empowerment. Generalist social work, in essence, does not focus on one aspect of the life of the client. On the other hand, other helping professions are limited to the scope of work …show more content…
However, the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) is one of the non-social work courses that have influenced my thinking about social work. In PLDC, the major point of discussion is how leaders should interact with their soldiers. In addition to that, this non-social work course is mostly about various ways that can be applied to meet the requisite achievements through leadership. For instance PLDC seeks to enable a person to use the available resources to maximize the outcomes. In essence, such resources are aimed at bettering the general life of people. Looking at this course, I get so many insights regarding social work. For instance, social work is not limited to the domain of social work environment. In leadership or political or medical spheres, for instance, there must be presence of an activity that amounts to social work. Basically, social work is a universal aspect that is found in every sphere of work or