Preview

Genetic Engineering: Super Soldiers In The Future

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genetic Engineering: Super Soldiers In The Future
Although this may seem like a great idea to many, there is always an opposing group. However, scientists can develop something that could satisfy both groups. For example, if one digs deeper into germline manipulation, how germ cells pass down DNA, then they will see that scientists could possibly prevent “fake” humans from reproducing with actual humans (Epstein). And, if they can prevent sexual reproduction, then they can still allow edited humans to be able to reproduce, as they only had genetic diseases removed. Somatic cell manipulation is manipulation of the cells that do not pass on DNA (Epstein). So, the process is the key to creating a safer society with super soldiers in the future. A safer society where people no longer have to stress …show more content…
According to others, genetic engineering “threatens the planet’s biodiversity by upsetting the natural balance” (“10 Reasons”). There is a lot of disagreement with this science because people are just not ready for it, but they should allow it and see how smoothly it goes. The Northwest Resistance Against Genetic Engineering believes that once engineered organisms are in the wild there is no going back. That engineered foods will be unsafe to eat. And, that scientists want to make engineered crops for profit. For gullible people, all that was stated above would seem extremely logical, but it is absolutely not. For example the process has been used to “develop sheep that produce a therapeutic protein in their milk that can be used to treat cystic fibrosis, or worms that glow in the dark to allow scientists to learn more about diseases such as Alzheimer’s” ("UNL's AgBiosafety”). The lunatics that stated genetic engineering was unsafe are just used to good, old fashioned, traditional ways. They should realize that the future is now and that the future depends on science, so they should approve genetic engineering for the public and see how well it …show more content…
A lot of countries around the globe are suffering from lack of food, but this can be solved. For example, as of right now, gene modifications of somatic cells are under current regulations for gene therapy (Tanya). That basically means that at this moment those countries could be reducing hunger for many people. Another way that genetic engineering could benefit nations is by modifying cells because it could be a huge money-maker for most people (Epstein). Another source supports the previous statement as it states that DNA is like a cookbook ("UNL's AgBiosafety”). Money is always important when it comes to legalizing anything, so it is clearly observed that genetic engineering will produce money. So far animal experiments have attempted to increase muscle mass or growth rate (“Genetic Enhancement”). This goes back to what was mentioned earlier on how modified plants and animals could save the globe from the terrors of starvation. To further prove the point, a source stated that “Greater success has been achieved in genetic enhancement of plants, which are more easily manipulated genetically and reproductively” (“Genetic Enhancement”). It seems that genetic engineering is a smart choice for agriculture as it will provide more crops for less money. And, “In order for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to control the introduction and use of genetic enhancement technologies, these techniques

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two metropolitan areas that I have selected are New Orleans my hometown where I was born and raised before hurricane Katrina and Corpus Christi, Texas my new hometown where I have resided at since hurricane Katrina. The Criminal Offense for New Orleans and for Corpus Christi, Texas is Property Crime.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the pros of genetically modified organisms is how cheap the outcome is. Take the GMO based company, Monsanto, for example. The sole purpose of this big name company is to produce an unbelievable amount of seeds, genetically modified of course, and ship them to places with food insecurity. These places include third world countries like much of Africa which suffer from chronic hunger. Monsanto is the answer to these third world companies – their mission is to put a stop to world hunger with the production of these GMO seeds. This all comes back around to the advancement of science. Without science, there would be no possible way to produce so many seeds – with GMOs, scientists are able to cut the time it would take to produce these seeds…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people look at GMOs with a sort of view as if to ask: Why should I eat new GMO crops, when I could eat a crop that has been around for millennia? What they don’t understand, is that there is really no such thing as a crop that scientists just altered. People have been modifying plants since the creation of agriculture twelve thousand years ago. While it may have been done differently back then, the current method of genetically modifying plants is just a more deliberate way of doing what humankind has always done. The only difference now is that people have a scientific understanding of what they are doing and have improved agricultural techniques; advancements in agriculture have moved from the farm to the lab. The reason that I think so many people are opposed to GMOs, is because they don’t understand what they are, and because they think that scientists are doing something radical in making GMOs; they fear the unknown.”(Chrisopher…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    DARK Act Argument Essay

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The risks to our health and exposed for using genetically modified crops or plants have not been yet proven because we are too early in the game of this genetically modification and engineering process. Thinking that this is a small solution to our problem for hunger and feeding Americans, then maybe they are just creating more problems that may not have solutions for in the future. However, the US National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, states otherwise. In a new report that details how genetically modified organisms are apparently safe for human consumption and surprisingly, also have significant benefits for human health and the environment(FDA.org). They base their findings on an intensive and detailed report with past studies about GMOs. The many interviews with scientists, researchers and field experts that have data stating that they are not bad for one’s health. This helps determine whether it is good or bad for the health when it comes to eating genetical modified foods. They even have a new study that suggests that when crops are being engineered to improve human health, by altered to produce more vitamins or nutrients. This might be one good side of it, but why should we playing with mother nature? This is a big gamble we are…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic Engineering is a notorious and complex subject, burdened with ethical and moral debates, packed with fascinating science. Everything begins with DNA, (Deoxyribonucleic acid). We are all made up of DNA. Without understanding DNA, genetic engineering or any sort of alteration within engineering of DNA is unfeasible. If you do ask someone, (what is a designer baby?), who does not know the science behind designer babies or genetic engineering, they may say it is a creation against the nature as we are dismantling natures characteristics and deciding to adjust the faults.…

    • 5533 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Gmo Not Safe

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Genetically Modified organisms or Gmo’s are unacceptable. People have been modifying genetics since the beginning of agriculture more than 10,000 years ago. People have been utilizing selective breeding in order to produce superior crops and animal. However, not only their are creating superior crops and animals, their harming plants and animals during the process. We have been told GM crops will feed the world, but that’s clearly not the point.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysisi of "One Art"

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this poem "One Art" by Elizabeth Bishop what literally occurs is that the speaker proposes that some things are essentially intended to be lost and that losing them should not be taken so seriously. She claims that we become accustomed to loss by working with little things like "door keys" or "the hour badly spent" (line 5), so that when considerable losses happen we will be prepared for it. Also, as the poem progresses it shifts to more significant losses.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the practice of genetic engineering in animals, like those that oppose crop genetic engineering, do so because of the risk associated with the practice and because they feel it would not do anything to help fight world hunger. However, the practice of genetic engineering in animals sparks a new group of opponents. These new group of opponents oppose the practice for ethical reasons. Brenda Almond, in “Commodifying Animals: Ethical Issues in Genetic Engineering of Animals,” states “it is, of course, true that the crossing of species and the creation of new forms of life seems to set humans a god-like challenge” (98). It appears that the author, like those who oppose the practice for ethical reasons, believes that there is only…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sci 207

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While there are some promising aspects to possible improvement in the quality of the food supply for both livestock and humans through genetic engineering, but there is little hope of using it as a solution to end world hunger. The world hunger crisis has more to do with economics and politics than supply and production. Society seems to realize that investment’s in agriculture…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    gmo paper

    • 1365 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We hit the age where we can genetically alter foods with specific genetic engineering. Genetically altering certain foods sounds like a great idea, some companies modify their rice to contain a high amount of Vitamin A. That’s one example of the many genetically modified foods today. It seems like theres a high promise for genetically modifying crops to contain certain vitamins and to be able to withstand certain pesticides but there is the fear of the unknown. There are many reasons why people are against GMO’s such as the cross pollination of plants and the spike in allergies. “The percentage of Americans with three or more chronic illnesses jumped from 7% to 13% in just 9 years; food allergies skyrocketed, and disorders such as autism, reproductive disorders, digestive problems, and others are on the rise.” (Institute of Responsible Technology) It’s not for sure that all of the disorders listed will happen. That’s where the fear of the unknown comes in…

    • 1365 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the modification is performed improperly the damage inflicted could prove to be irreversible. At one point when testing on animals it has been shown that “germline introduction of an improperly regulated normal gene resulted in pogency of the modified animal with no obvious effects on development, but enhanced tumor incidence during adult life” (Hall 162). Along with the fact that “although such methods may be undertaken to fabricate improved humans, in some cases, by accident or intent, the outcomes will be quasi-human or less than human” (Hall 164) people are hesitant to make this method of medicine wide spread. Another reason why people are worried about the mass populace utilizing this technology is due to the fact that some may consider it “a satanic act of disbelief and corruption that would change the nature with which God created human beings” (Sachedina 190). Other ethical concerns may include the “deep-seated fear of the further deterioration of social and familial values” (Sachedina 192) that could possibly occur through the overuse of cloning and genetic engineering technology. As a result of these factors concerned individuals have spoken out against the use of such technologies in favor of safer and more commonly accepted methods of curing the ill and providing crops for…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As applied to the opposition, the risks that come with genetic research could be so substantial that society would ultimately enjoy more benefits without it. There would be no concerns about mutations, and no GMO fiasco. However, humanity could stand to reap the benefits of the considerable advances resulting from genetic research. Advanced diagnostic procedures and disease treatment will improve the health of the population as a whole. To satisfy both sides, research could continue, but under strict guidelines. Any genetically modified consumables must be grown within isolated parameters, to ensure that they cannot leach into the natural environment. Comprehensive testing must be completed, and any experiments proven unsafe for humans and the environment must not be reproduced for public…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays