as beneficial. On the contrary, images, like genetically modified food, or GMO, are seen negative in picture.
as beneficial. On the contrary, images, like genetically modified food, or GMO, are seen negative in picture.
While the two writers present a strong case for and against genetic modification in human beings respectively, Green’s argument is more persuasive than Hayes. Through evaluating rhetorical strategies, we may begin to see why Green is more persuasive. In Green’s essay, his main claim is that it is time that genetic modification in humans came to be accepted in society. Green evaluates the case of a British couple who were granted the permission to go ahead with the use of genetic technology in humans in this case the use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and in-vitro fertilization in selecting healthy embryos for implantation to eliminate breast cancer from family lines forever.…
Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…
Just like any other medical procedures there are a variety of risks that can interfere with a successful genetic modification procedure. To begin with this procedure can result in unpredictable responses from the immune system of the embryo. Genetic modification requires the introduction of a virus into the targeted cells. This process can go wrong if the wrong cells are targeted and the virus reacts negatively with the host cells. It may cause infections that can lead to further complications. There are situations where tumors develop as a result of the genetic modification process (Mayo Clinic Therapy, 2016). All of these risks greatly undermine the viability of genetic modification, especially since a lot of trials have to be conducted before a successful modification can be made. It is highly unethical to experiment with human genes because of the reasons that these risks have on the end results. Many human beings can be subjected to avoidable medical conditions in the future because of the genetic modification practices conducted on them. In Gattaca, the human beings born outside the eugenics program were viewed as insignificant. The quest for perfection when it comes to genetic modification meant that members of the society in the film had to live with these risks to be…
It is amazing to think that we can choose how our kids will be. Do we want to raise generations of fools or generations of intellects and scholars? Of course we want the latter. We do not want our futures in the hands of incompetent beings, which is why genetic engineering is such a plausible solution. Right now, genetic engineering control is in the hands of government which is where it needs to stay. The ability alter the chemical make-up of a population or food is too much power and responsibility for one person to hand, which is why it needs to be in the watchful eye of our government superiors. We have trusted our government to directly deal with issues we as Americans would rather ignore like war and discrepancies regarding the value of money over the past; consequently, this emphasizes my main idea, which is that genetic engineering should be monitored and overseen by our…
Genetically modifying foods is an imprecise experiment with widespread repercussions that is harmful to practically everyone involved and should be stopped. This relatively modern technology gives scientists the ability to change and swap the DNA make-up of any species. While this may seem like a b…
Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…
Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…
Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…
The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…
In Andrew Niccol's film Gattaca, we see our protagonist being effected by the discrimination of gene altering. This showcases the negative effect of modern technology caused by how society has implemented it, gene altering is very beneficial to human advancement, however due to how our society used this technology it…
Hereditarily screening our posterity to improve individuals is simply dependable child rearing and an ethical commitment. As guardians we need our children to experience their fullest capacities. Genetically altering babies could be viewed as an "ethical commitment" as it makes them grow up into "morally better kids", this in light of a couple of hereditary connections to 'identity issue. Genetically modifying individuals can help improve the quality of life and overall make up the society by allowing parents to choose the DNA makeup of their offspring.…
Since the beginning of time, the human race has attempted to perfect our lives, constantly adapting, and learning, and changing our environment to suit our needs. we have been changing the world dramatically in a large variety of environments from the atmosphere to the rainforests, and soil in which the trees grow. Up to this point we have been manipulating our environment in nearly any way we can imagine, making ourselves the dominant race on the earth, but perhaps we should be aware of how far we are going. Currently humanity attempts to meddle with the very material that makes all that lives what it is, their DNA or genetic makeup. This is a very serious area of science that we are beginning to dive into, Because of the severity of tampering with the genetic makeup of nature, we must bring to attention the question: To what extent is it ethical to continue the use of GMOs for the betterment of society, and the progression of the human race considering the risks?…
Religion, any religion, also represent a powerful persuasive aspect of cognition that can be related to the formation of anti-GMO thinking. People tend to believe that nature has its own purpose and value, and has been created by a higher agent, which power and actions are a priori undiscussable and untouchable. Such reasoning leads to a conclusion that any attempts to change and/or manipulate the natural way of existence and development of any organisms by the means of technological intervention is wrong, and opposes the will of that higher agent. According to Blancke, genetic modification is perceived by religious people as a “game” where scientists try to play a role of God, consequently going against the will of nature and causing disasters…
Two general topics with a lot to back them up. For the ethical argument, people have been divided. Manipulating and modifying certain aspects of genes have had both negative as well as positive thoughts. The negative side has stated things such as for example: If we have the right to modify and animal? And if yes, what superior right would that be? Who is it that say we can go against natural evolution? Is it really right to artificially change and animal/organism to our own benefit? While the positive side has stated that modifying the DNA is justifiable as long as we in a clear way strongly benefit from it. So, basically this main argument has been hinging on whether altering DNA is right. Moving on to agriculture. Within the agricultural argument things like ending starvation and benefiting farmers have been discussed. The ending starvation part has been based upon the mass production of GMOs, and if we're able to produce more food we could possibly have a chance at ending starvation. Especially considering the amount that GMOs would provide, since we now would have a larger quantity of food that is both cheaper and better to produce. The against side has, however stated that this mass production of GMOs could be dangerous, since we…
Human genetic modification is very controversial in the world right now. Many think it should be allowed and many think otherwise. Why is genetic modification controversial throughout the world right now? Genetic modification is the direct manipulation of an organism’s genome using biotechnology. When you genetically modify an organism it can cause good things and bad things.…