Gun Control Argumentative Essay
Gun control has been an ongoing issue in the United States for the past few years due to the increase of gun related deaths such as school and mass shootings. There have been debates on whether to eradicate firearms from Americans. These ideas were addressed by the United States government and gun control advocates who are for stricter gun control. On the other hand, people who oppose the policy feel that their 2nd amendment rights will be violated just because there are reoccurring school and mass shooting that are being committed by what are perceived as mentally unstable individuals. This essay will examine the perspectives of both sides of gun control and the mental state of the suspects of the attacks.
First the perspective from gun …show more content…
Philosopher David Hume once said that “Reason is the slave of passion”. In other words, anti-gun control advocates and gun control advocates allow their passion on the issue overshadow the logical and rational understanding on how to come to resolution. Statistics and facts are included in their arguments but their feelings guide them to their respective sides. In addition, most gun control debates have knowledgeable representors but they often come their conclusion due their passionate emotions on the issue. In all honesty, neither one is absolutely correct however, they do have strong elements of truth about gun control. It is unrealistic to fathom having a nation without guns. Americans are privileged to buy guns to defend their livelihood which is a fundamental right. Conversely, background checks, educational training, and testing to determine if a person is qualified to handle firearms should be required since violent criminals and psychopathic criminals are able to obtain guns from street dealers or pawn shops without the need for verification. It is a strange dichotomy that any deranged person can buy a gun with minimal repercussions since they usually commit suicide or a detained, but gun owners who are law abiding citizens have to suffer from the idea that their gun rights are at risk.
In summary, the gun control debate between
First the perspective from gun …show more content…
Philosopher David Hume once said that “Reason is the slave of passion”. In other words, anti-gun control advocates and gun control advocates allow their passion on the issue overshadow the logical and rational understanding on how to come to resolution. Statistics and facts are included in their arguments but their feelings guide them to their respective sides. In addition, most gun control debates have knowledgeable representors but they often come their conclusion due their passionate emotions on the issue. In all honesty, neither one is absolutely correct however, they do have strong elements of truth about gun control. It is unrealistic to fathom having a nation without guns. Americans are privileged to buy guns to defend their livelihood which is a fundamental right. Conversely, background checks, educational training, and testing to determine if a person is qualified to handle firearms should be required since violent criminals and psychopathic criminals are able to obtain guns from street dealers or pawn shops without the need for verification. It is a strange dichotomy that any deranged person can buy a gun with minimal repercussions since they usually commit suicide or a detained, but gun owners who are law abiding citizens have to suffer from the idea that their gun rights are at risk.
In summary, the gun control debate between