Preview

History Of The Bill Of Rights Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History Of The Bill Of Rights Essay
The Bill of Rights was something that the antifederalist wanted to be in the constitution. This was one of the compromises that the founders came up with so that they could ratify the constitution. The Anti-federalist wanted the Bill of Rights so that every person in the country knew what rights could not be taken way rom them, these rights were called inalienable rights. The Federalist finally gave in to producing such rights, and thus the Bill of Rights were formed. Finally with the Bill of Rights in place the constitution was ratified in 1791. The Anti-Federalist did not like how the constitution wasn’t dividing things equally among all three branches of the government. The Anti-federalists wanted the government divided into branches, but also did not want them to be to powerful where the people could not run them. They did this so no branch had more power than another. This was to solve the problem that was inevitable. The fight over who is the more important branch. The anti federalist put this into play due to the fact of arguing and uncertainty. They used this as a kind of safe guard for citizens’ rights. …show more content…

They thought that if they could pass anything why not one that could be harmful.
In conclusion, the Anti-federalist wanted government divided into branches, but they did not want any branch to have more power than any other. Having the power over the government allowed citizens to become more open and voice their own opinions. However they could not just make any law up, the laws had to be in the best interest of the country. The Bill of Rights made sure that the peoples best interest was displayed at the national level. The Bill of Rights was to show the people what their rights are and have the enumerated rights written


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The U.S Constitution did not contain the freedoms that are now outlined in the Bill of Rights, when it was signed on Sept. 17, 1787. The issue of a listing of rights that couldn’t be violated upon by the stronger and new national government became the center of ratification…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Anti federalist was more convincing because, Anti-Federalists fight that the Constitution gave lot more ability to the federal government, although speaking too much control away from state and local governments. Many perceive that the federal government would be too long removed to represent the ordinary citizen. Anti-Federalists scared that the nation was too large for the national government to answer to the anxieties of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also feared that the real text of the Constitution did not consist of a bill of rights.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalist Party, led by Patrick Henry, objected to the constitution. They objected to it for a few basic reasons. Mostly the Anti-Federalists thought that the Constitution created too strong a central government. They felt that the Constitution did not create a Federal government, but a single national government. They were afraid that the power of the states would be lost and that the people would lose their individual rights because a few individuals would take over. They proposed a "Bill of Rights", to make sure the citizens were protected by the law. They believed that no Bill of Rights would be equal to no check on our government for the people.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the federalist drafted the constitution, the anti- federalist opposed it because it gave too much power to the national government and that is how they come to the bill of right. they all work together to…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Federalists; John Day, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and James Madison, were supporters of the constitution. They believed that our nation needed a strong federal government. The reasoning behind their belief was because they found it was necessary that a strong federal government be made for the entire country. As said in the Federalist Paper number it mentions the idea of checks and balances which would prevent one branch from growing too strong and it would limit the governments power.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    antifederalists paper

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the reasons the Anti-Federalist refused to ratify the constitution was because it gave too much power to the government. The constitution would allow the government to tax the people much like British government had done so before in England. Another aspect that they did not like was that the Anti-Federalist felt like the government term positions were too long. They feared that those in power would not want to lose such a power and would end up taking over the position they were in. The Anti-Federalist also felt like they gave too much power to the executive branch by giving him the power to veto laws and to have control of the army. They felt like the executive branch could use the position of Commander in chief to oppress the people. The Anti- Federalist felt as if the constitution was being modeled as though the British were once again in control of them like from before.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Anti-Federalists believed that mankind always seeks freedom and a social contract between the person and the state or the government to protect safety and rights such as happiness, self-defense and unalienable. Anti-Federalists also believed states declaration of rights is not enough and that these rights are so essential to life such as life, liberty and property that we can’t even risk losing it. After all it was seen necessary to specifically have Bill of Rights as the Anti-Federalists wanted to keep our…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The federalist called for a strong central government, a federal bank and an army. They proposed a new constitution, while the Anti-federalist wanted to remain under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-federalist planned for the almost unavoidable corruption of a powerful central government. They wanted true federalism, a much better plan for our country long term.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It came from the ones who were striving to help this new nation stand on its two feet. It came from the great minds like: James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Wilson, John Marshall, John Dickinson, Roger Sherman, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and the list goes on and on. But the Anti-Federalist wanted to make sure that they would be getting before they would sign the Constitution. When the Bill of Rights was written it had only been 8 years since the American Revolutionary War had ended and the young nation was trying to figure out how to run thins without a monarchy. Why did the Founding Fathers think that we should need the Bill of Rights?…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were against the ratification of the Constitution because they felt that the constitution gave the national government too much power, especially over the states. Their central beliefs of government was that it should be focused on a strict interpretation of the Constitution and its necessary and proper clause. Instead of the government having implied powers given to them by the elastic clause, the antifederalists wanted the government to just stick to its already delegated powers stated in the document. In addition, since the Antifederalists wanted the states and the people to have more power over the government, they favored a small national one. They also believed that once the central government has too much power that they’ll impose on the rights of the people almost like the old monarchy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While federalists preferred a stronger central government and the Anti’s were the exact opposite a compromise was to be made in order to satisfy the majority of the people. This comprise was the bill of rights, which gives the basic freedoms to the people and limits the power of the government (consent of the governed).…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays