Preview

How Did The Allies Role Support The Coun-Try's Strategy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Allies Role Support The Coun-Try's Strategy
In this essay it will be argued that allies play a significant role in support of the coun-try’s strategy . Specifically, Germany’s case will be analysed just after its unification in 1871, when Prussian Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck put remarkable efforts to make Germany a great power in Europe at that time. Geopolitical situation in the second part of the nineteenth century required a wide range of strategic movements within the European political arena. Bismarck clearly understood that protection of the newly created State would be possible only keeping the peace in the continent. The only way to materialize his vision was proper balancing among other powers such as Russia, France, Austria and United Kingdom. According to his strategy, Germany …show more content…
As D. Kagan emphasised ‘Bismarck liked to say that in the world of five powers ‘try to be a trois’’ (Kagan, 1995). The official background of this “project” was based on general values that three Empires shared: monarchy and resistance against France represented republicanism, democracy, and socialism. The agreement was made to consult one another that ‘the maintenance of the peace of Europe be secured, and if necessary be enforced, against attack from any quarter’ (Craig, 1980). However, Bismarck’s rationale in reality was to keep Russia close, in the way that Germany would be able to influence her foreign policy which could interfere with Germany’s interests. On the other hand, continuing strong disagreements between Austria and Russia in terms of disputes regarding influence in Balkans made the League very much formal rather than effective. This issue continued to be visible throughout the existence of the League, including its renewal in 1881. Moreover, developing anti-German and nationalist feelings inside the Russia had a potential to turn into the hate and friendly moves towards …show more content…
His idea was to establish alliances based on mutual support thus limiting any Germany allies’ possibility to sign any agreement with France. As an initial step to his plan Bismarck selected Austria. The treaty to create the Dual Alliance was signed in 1879. As Chancellor noted ‘I wanted to dig a ditch between her and the Western powers’ (Kagan, 1995). Bismarck saw Austria “an easy target” as it was much weaker than Germany at this time, shared common cultural and linguistic background and had mutual interest to assist each other in case of attack by Russia. Additionally, in the Treaty it was noted the maintenance of neutrality in case of attack from any other power. The Dual Alliance ‘was the keystone of the Bismarckian system of preserving the German Empire by keeping peace in Europe’ (Kagan,1995), and set a background for the long lasting cooperation between Austria and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What did Bismarck substitute for the alliance of the three emperors that promised neutrality if the other was attacked?…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Dbq 1 Analysis

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck created the idea of alliances because he did not want to fight a war on two fronts and he wanted other countries to help him: “When negotiations failed, he developed an alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy which became known as the triple alliance. In response, France and Russia and Great Britain formed an alliance known as the Triple Entente” (Background essay). Both alliances created plans because they were paranoid that the other alliance would start a war. Alliances influenced WWI to occur because it made countries bolder in the war since they had other countries to support…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II’s foreign policy undid Bismarck’s policies, where he worked towards avoiding a war on two fronts for Germany. Apart from Austria-Hungary Alliance (1879), Three Emperor's Alliance (1881), treaties with Serbia in 1881 and Romania in 1883, Triple Alliance (1882) and eventually the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia (1887), which he considered essential to keep the Russians from reaching an alliance with the French and threaten Germany on two sides. The Schlieffen Plan, conceived by Count Alfred von Schlieffen in 1905 and further refined in the years was to cater for this eventuality. This occurred when the Russian Treaty was scheduled to expire in June 1890 and the Russians under The Tzar, Alexander III were aware of the fact that Bismarck was about to be replaced. Therefore, to secure relations with Germany they suggested renewing the Reinsurance Treaty for 6 years instead of 3 years. The new German Chancellor Caprivi and Wilhelm II decided not to renew it, this gave Russia a feeling of being isolated and vulnerable as her relations with Britain were not good at that time and it was just a natural development that France and Russia form an alliance. The French diplomats immediately began to work on this with the Tzar and an alliance was negotiated in 1894. This action was the one where…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book “Imperial Germany 1871-1918” by Volker R. Berghahn has the under title Economy, Society, Culture and Politics and was first published in 1994 by Berghahn books. The used edition is the revised and expanded edition published in 2005 and summarizes the events in the ‘Kaiserreich’ (1871-1918). Furthermore, the book has 388 pages and is divided in five parts which are Economy, Society, Culture, the Realm of Politics, and World War I. Each part has numerous under parts giving the reader detailed information about each part. In addition, the author did tremendous research on the German Empire, founded by Otto von Bismarck in 1871 and lasting until the end of World War I, to clarify the broader outlines of the development between 1871 and 1918 and to explain why Germany went to war in 1914 and lost that conflict four years later.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Franco-Prussian war of 1870 acted as a watershed in European history with the formation of the German Empire. No power alone, (perhaps with the exception of Russia) could defeat the new German Empire, and all the European powers with the exception of France were willing to allow Bismarck to consolidate German gains provided there was no further expansion. Bismarck having successfully won the Franco-Prussian war of 1870 and having united Germany, sought to ‘preserve the settlement of 1871’ by maintaining the status of the German empire as a great power amongst the European nations and avoiding conflict. Between 1871- 1890 Bismarck presided as the chancellor and introduced a variety of foreign and domestic policies in the hope of keeping Germany a great power. At home, he concentrated on building a powerful German state and encouraged nationalism and the ideal of a German national identity. In foreign affairs his goal was to make Prussia the dominant power in the German Empire, and to establish the empire as a great power in Europe. Through various alliance systems he managed to accomplish this aim. His resignation in 1890 marked the end of the Bismarckian system and ushered in the Wilehenmne era. This essay will set out to explore the extent to which Bismarck’s successors, William II, Leo von Caprivi, Hohenlohe and Bülow, changed his policy in the decade 1890-1900.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck was one of the three most important political figures in Germany, besides Martin Luther and Adolph Hitler. Prior to World War I, Bismark contributed to and maintained Germany as an international power. In order to maintain Germany as an international power, Bismark’s overall first concern was to keep France isolated to prevent any retribution from France. He prevented any military alliance with France. His second concern was that Austria-Hungary and Russia posed a threat to peace. Bismarck’s solution was to keep Russia and Ausrtia-Hungary close to him to try and prevent any conflict. Russia thought the Ottoman Empire were the “sick man of Europe,” and was negative towards the empire. This worried Bismarck, because he wanted to maintain peace between two enemies, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Bismarck’s efforts at the Conference of Berlin (1878), angered Russian nationalists which made Bismarck enter a military alliance with Austria against Russia. This alliance ultimately lasted until the end of World War I. Since Italy was on bad terms with France, they were motivated to join Germany. This created the Triple Alliance. Bismarck remained fearful about tensions…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This balancing act, however, angered true liberals because Bismarck had mixed their ideas with his conservatism, thus contaminated their previously apparent, separate ideologies. They also criticized his nationalism because his domestic policies would be problematic in the long run-- and these liberals would later be proven correct (Doc 7). Though Bismarck as a genius at balancing the forces against him, the balancing act could only last so long. Soon, Bismarck was fired and the old Kaiser died, leaving Kaiser Wilhelm II to disband most of Bismarck’s policies and inevitably cause World War One. During Bismarck’s time as Prime Minister, he had to balance his foreign affairs as well. In order to do that, he created an alliance system with the two powers surrounding him, Austria and Russia. However, after Bismarck was fired, Wilhelm II disbanded the alliance with Russia, and France quickly allied in Germany's place. After this shift in alliance, Serbian radicals decided to assassinate the Austrian heir. In a vengeful rage, Austria went after Serbia and was thus backed up by Germany. Serbia was backed up by Russia and was thus backed up by France. Then, England joined France’s side and World War One began because the men after Bismarck couldn’t handle what Bismarck had previously…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great War Causes

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, these alliance systems were intended to preserve peace in Europe; on the contrary, it drove them into world war. These alliance systems developed their roots when Prussia’s chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, claimed Germany to be a peaceful power, even though he assumed France wanted revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. Thus, Beck states that “in 1879, Bismarck formed the Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary; three years later, Italy joined the two countries, forming the Triple Alliance.” During the same year, to ensure that France did not make an alliance with Russia, Bismarck immediately formed an alliance with Russia. Nonetheless, under the reign of Germany’s new leader Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany’s treaty with Russia broke and Russia later formed a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894. Although outraged by this alliance, Wilhelm II focused on starting a shipbuilding project in order to make the German navy identical to the famous British fleet. Based on the distrust of attack, Britain formed an alliance with France and Russia, named the Triple Entente. These alliances faced off at the Austria-Hungarian and Siberian assassination conflict. Even though Germany did not give support to its ally Austria-Hungary, Tsar Nicholas ordered…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    asdsa

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European leaders believed creating a balance of power would prevent one country from being more powerful than another European country. The idea was if Germany, England, France, and Russia were all equal in power, than there would be no war. But the Chancellor of Prussia, Otto von Bismarck, thought differently. He didn’t like that Germany was being squished by Russia and France, so to solve this problem he created an alliance with Austria- Hungary.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The formation of the National Units of Germany and Italy justified Nationalist aspirations of expansion. Bismarck guided the way to forming new alliances. Germany was under the chancellorship of Bismarck when he joined the three most conservative powers of the Big Five- Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia into the Three Emperor’s League. The League made consultation over mutual interest and friendly neutrality corner stone of the alliance. Identifying enemies and choosing allies depended on geographic weaknesses.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The alliances between Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire and France, Britain, Russia are formed because of the increasing political tension and untrust between the countries. At the time, the alliances may have helped promote peace and cooperation in Europe, but it was also an extremely risky arrangement as it would drag in all the other countries if only two start fighting. Indeed, after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, what was originally a conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia eventually erupted into a full scale war between several countries. This proves that the alliances ultimately magnified the problems and led the countries into extreme vulnerability towards any conflict.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cold War Analysis

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In accordance with Gaddis’s arguments, the past provides many examples of actors who shaped the world around them through their character. Metternich’s role in the preservation of the Austrian state serves as one of the best examples of this influence. His organization of the Congress of Vienna and diplomatic skill resulted in the establishment of both the Holy Alliance and the Quadruple Alliance (Kissinger 1994, 85). Kissinger argues that systemic state-building trends weakened Austria during the nineteenth century, but that Metternich’s construction of the Congress system facilitated European peace and rejected power politics (Kissinger 1994, 85). Bismarck serves as another historical example of Gaddis’s individualist argument. Kissinger repeatedly credits the first unification of Germany to Bismarck’s personal political prowess (Kissinger 1994, 187). The decline of both Austria and Germany after the removal of Metternich and Bismarck provides evidence of their unique political…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays