Preview

How Did William D. Hassett Use The Atomic Bomb?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2603 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did William D. Hassett Use The Atomic Bomb?
The Atomic Bomb, Through the Eyes of William D. Hassett

William D. Hassett became the President’s secretary at the start of 1944, five years into World War II, and three years into America’s involvement. He served as President Roosevelt’s and then President Truman’s secretary until 1952. Hassett was born in Vermont on August 28, 1880. He attended Clark University from 1902 to 1904 and after two years became a reporter for the Burlington Free Press. He served as an assistant secretary to the president from 1935 until 1944 when he was promoted to secretary by President Roosevelt. He remained secretary through Roosevelt’s and for a majority of Truman’s presidency, and he became a trusted associate for both presidents. Because of this relationship,
…show more content…
The cause of this destruction was a successful testing of the Atomic Bomb, which is now ready to be produced as necessary. Our physicist, Enrico Fermi, estimates that this bomb has a force equivalent to that of ten thousand TNT. Any trace of the one hundred foot tower has yet to be found. - General Leslie Groves”
The Manhattan project was a success, and now the bomb capable of destroying a city was ready to be used at the will of one man. Mr. Stimson and President Truman have already received word of this success. Truman now had to decide what to do with such a power. He and Mr. Stimson had agreed that the atomic bomb would be used on “military objectives and soldiers and sailors...not women and children. The target will be a purely military
…show more content…
General Dwight Eisenhower was one of such people, despite the fact that he had witnessed firsthand the destruction and death of the war. Eisenhower received news of America’s intentions soon after the success of the Trinity test. His belief was that Japan was handily defeated as it stood, and that no atom bomb would be necessary to force the Japanese into surrender. Soon after the bomb was dropped, General Eisenhower was asked about it during an interview. He said “The Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing." The capital soon realized that Eisenhower’s beliefs weren’t isolated. Many of the higher ups disagreed with the decision that Truman made.
Japan has finally surrendered. The date is August fifteenth, and no one is more relieved at the news than President Truman. The final details are yet to be hashed out, but as it stands, Japan has accepted the unconditional surrender, deciding that to wage war with the Soviet Union and battle America in a Nuclear war was not worth the fight.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first option would allow President Truman to end the war peacefully, and it would have also allowed the Japanese to withdraw from the war without shame to their leader and save the thousands of Japanese individuals by not making the United States have to make the choice of dropping the atomic bombs. This option would have let Truman show that “We as Americans have not sunk to the level of our enemies” “We should end the war now in a manner that reflects the value we place on the sanctity of human life and the dignity of the individual”. The author gives Truman a second option and this option approaches the war in the Pacific with a demonstration of the atomic bomb in efforts to force the Japanese to surrender without condition. This includes the uprising of the Manhattan Project which gave the United States the “weapon of almost inconceivable power” with the scare tactics of the demonstration this gives the Japanese leaders an idea of what would…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After years of war and destruction, American soldiers and civilians were beyond weary and restless, yet the Japanese were steadfast and refused to give up their fight. Sworn in as the 33rd United States president, after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s sudden death, Harry S. Truman presided over the end of WWII. When Truman learned of the success of the “Manhattan Project” he knew that he was faced with a decision of unparalleled gravity. He was well aware that the capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, however, he was also aware that it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon the world had ever known. July 26, 1945 President Truman, United Kingdom Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Government Chiang Kaishek, released the Potsdam Declaration.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butow's Argument Analysis

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Butow supports his argument by stating that the militarists’ “attitudes” eradicated any thought for surrender. Providing primary sources from Marquis Kido, Japanese governmental and military officials, Butow offers evidence that provides historians with a new perspective. The new perspective that Butow focuses on examines the terms of surrender offered to the Japanese at the Potsdam Conference. Through his investigation of the Potsdam terms, the author argues that Japan would have surrendered much faster if the United States had retracted the idea of unconditional surrender. Based on Butow’s arguments future historians would develop the author’s initial findings through their research and viewpoints on the terms of unconditional surrender.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key reason for Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic Bomb was the alternative options were not proper solutions. Dropping the bomb wasn’t the only considered option. The main “runner up” was a mass invasion of Japan. This idea was very dangerous. The casualties for the US were projected to be over 1,000,000 soldiers, and 5,000,000 japanese soldiers. One of the other alternatives was the idea of displaying to true power of the atomic weapon to Japan through a test. Such an idea had way too many flaws to be applicable. There was only enough Plutonium and Uranium available to the US for two bombs, (Little Boy, Fat Man). Also this idea was a risk because if the weapon did not detonate, the US would look even weaker to the Japanese. The idea of barricading the Japanese was also a considered solution, using Naval vessels to trap the Japanese in until the US “starved them out”. The fault in this idea was the unreasonable amount of time and resources it would consume. After weighing the options, and thinking it through carefully, President Truman made the correct choice to drop the bomb.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    They knew that the decision they made was a tough one to make but they felt like it had to be done. President Truman and his administration decided to drop the weapons of in two different locations, killing over 166,000 Japanese people. As the death tolls rose and the emperor realized how many innocent people had lost their lives, he finally surrender to the United States ending World War II. As for the United States the surrender of the Japanese Empire ended the War, but it also showed the rest of the world that we were a powerful nation and we would not shy away from war, and we had the capabilities of destroying…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Running head:Truman and The Atomic Bombs 1 Truman and The Atomic Bombs Viviana Rodriguez-Rico Westview High School Bethel University History 212 Truman and The Atomic Bombs 2 Abstract One of the most historical events that occurred during World War II was the bombing in Japan. After, being attacked by Japan the thirty-third President of the United States, Harry S. Truman, made a immense and catastrophic decision. President Truman was not going to hold back and watch Japan take over. But, first President Truman had to think of a process; when and where the bombs were going to be dropped.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    military could see that. “On June 8 and imperial conference adopted The Fundamental Policy to be Followed Henceforth in the Conduct of the War”. This policy meant that the Japanese pledged to “prosecute the war to the bitter end, in order to uphold the national polity, protect the imperial land and accomplish the objectives for which we went to war” (Maddox). This policy, this pledge meant nothing other than what it said. Leaving President Truman in a tough situation. This policy meant that the Japanese were going to fight and die fighting. They were going to continue this war until they had gotten what they wanted to, until they had gotten what they had entered this war for. Japan's unwillingness to surrender was one of the reasons President Truman was forced to use the…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Harry Truman the choice whether to use the bomb or not to use the bomb was one of the most difficult decisions of his life. The American soldiers and civilians were exhausted from four years of war, but still the Japanese military refused to give up there fight. American forces where occupying Okinawa and Iwo Jima and were intensely fire bombing Japanese cities. Japan had an army of 2 million, and they were staying strong. They stationed them selves in the home islands guarding against any invasion. The Allies demanded for immediate surrender, although the demand said that refusal would result in total destruction, there was no mention of any weapon of mass destruction. The Japanese military refused to surrender.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had to account for the civilian’s lives, but also had to think about the outcome of the war if the United States had to continue to fight with ground units; after all of his careful thinking he finally decided. After President Truman considered the atomic bomb from a military perspective, he decided that the bomb was indeed the way to end…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman was justified in using atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. As commander-in Chief of US Armed forces, President Truman was responsible for the men and women in harms way. Americans and Japanese were dying, suffering life-altering injuries and experiencing torture and deprivation in prison camps each day the war raged. Additionally, it is important to look at the cultural elements of Japan, , the possible invasion of Japan, and the American morale during this time, when addressing the justification of Truman's decision.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    My fellow leaders and advisors held exceedingly ambivalent views, when our American Allies first issued the Potsdam Declaration late July. They demanded unconditional surrender of all our armed forces! If this wasn’t disreputable enough, they threatened imminent and complete destruction of not only our forces, but they insured absolute devastation of our homeland if we failed to comply with their egregious policy! One consequential condition declared on the Potsdam Declaration undoubtedly resonated with me personally and many other leaders and advisors. The declaration specified “elimination for all of the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After considering the pros and cons of the use of nuclear weapons I believe that President Truman and the U.S were not justified in the use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender. First of all there were alternative options to resolve the war than resorting to drop a bomb. Instead of bombing Japan we could’ve cut a deal or create a treaty to end the war with little to no bloodshed or could’ve even waited for the Russians to attack to scare Japan into conditional surrender or at least less casualties if assisted by U.S army. Truman should have assessed…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some critics may argue that the use of the atomic bomb was completely the last option the United States had because “the Japanese military was refusing to give up their fight” (ushistory.org). That was what ultimately caused Truman to make the decision to drop the bomb. What they were careless in thinking about was that not all…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays