These are two letters full of different rhetorical strategies, from two dissimilar companies. One from Mr. Ira C Herbert who represents the Coca-Cola Company USA, and the other from Mr. R. W. Seaver, the Executive Vice President of Grove Press Inc. The letter first sent is from the Coca-Col…
The insight Melissa Rubin offers about the Coca-Cola was how the advertisements reflect on the life and culture that is associated with the “Mainstream” and attempts to persuade buyers to associate positive aspects of the culture with their products. Melissa analysis the element of the coke advertisement promoted in August 1950 Coca-Cola Bottler magazine such as the placing of the advert, placement of, and the precise characters. She makes use of the history of the time in which the advertisements were printed and frequent records of the agency itself as proof to aid her claims about how it displays the "mainstream" of its day.…
PepsiCo is a big food and beverage industry that manufactures a lot of packaging for its products. I will closely examine the website to see how they are using rhetoric tools to send certain messages to the consumer, which is further explained in the following paragraphs of the analysis. As well as examining ideologies and the certain discourses that come with them. So having decided to do my rhetorical analysis on PepsiCo, I realized they are a big corporation with a lot of money that advertises a lot for its products. PepsiCo is a big part of this waste ending up in landfills.…
The correspondence of letters between Herbert of the Coca-Cola Company and Seaver of Grove Press Inc. serve to establish which company has the precedent to use the slogan “It’s the Real Thing.” Through satire and irony, Seaver undoubtedly offers the more persuasive case. Herbert appeals to his sense of logos to persuade Seaver to refrain from using the slogan by offering an accumulation of reasons to support his argument. Seaver’s initial tone is one of business sand politeness; upon further inspection, his scathing tone reveals itself by his rebuttal of each of Herbert’s arguments.…
He writes that in order to avoid confusion between the respective products due to the slogan, each "sales personnel [is] to make sure that what the customer wants is the book, rather than a Coke." Thus being quite humorous about the whole situation, Seaver maintains a conscious nativity in response to the authoritative and condescending tone of Herbert's letter. Seaver quite innocently writes that neither him nor anyone in the agency "realized that [the Coca-Cola Company] owned the phrase." It is this sort of underlying sarcasm that allows for a persuasive and entertaining argument. However, though Seaver may use biting humor to drive his point across, he manages to keep the letter on a respectful level, although he fully realizes the almost childlike and absurd nature of the…
has personally been in the same shoes as the Coca-Cola Company in this debate. He alludes to two of their own published books: One Hundred Dollar Misunderstanding and Games People Play. He illustrates how their situation was far worse in the sense that it was not only the motto that was being recycled but the name of the product itself with a few minor changes. However unlike the Coca-Cola Company, they did not make a major objection to it and instead embraced the fact that it was became widespread and significant. Seaver also refers to the First Amendment in that it states freedom of speech, refuting Coca-Cola's belief that they "owned the phrase". Both corporations equally have access to use it because there was no evident restriction saying that only Coca-Cola possessed exclusive…
Since the late nineteenth century Coca Cola has been a successful company. Coco-Cola went to war with its competitor PepsiCo throughout the 1990s as Coca-Cola expanded its market overseas. Its overseas sales increased to the point where over 85 percent of its sales came from outside of the United States (Ferrell, Fraedrich and Ferrell, 2011). As a consequence, the Coca-Cola brand and trademark is the most recognized in the world and worth an estimated $25 billion. Yet, by 2000 Coca-Cola failed to make Fortune’s list of most admired American companies because in part of its serious ethics violations like charges of racial discrimination, contractual disputes with distributors, problems with long-term contracts and that Coca-Cola misrepresented market tests (Ferrell, Fraedrich and Ferrell, 2011). This paper will examine the ethical issues Coca-Cola encountered to argue that its response to the crisis was handled well but nonetheless deeply affected the company’s bottom line.…
Coca-Cola is one of the largest recognized brands in the world, and that credit is owed to the large part of the company’s advertisement. Several other soft drink companies have tried but yet failed to compete with Coca-Cola’s advertising, making it a significant lead in the region of marketing. Coco-Cola uses ethos and pathos as rhetorical strategies to make the claim that their drink is delicious and refreshing, even Santa Clause, busiest man in the world, takes time out to drink it.…
The actual value for Kf for naphthalene is 7.45 K·kg/mol, so we're a fair amount off the mark. This is a rather crude experiment, so that's to be expected.…
Towards the third section of Herbert’s letter, he argues how the Coca-Cola company was the first to create the slogan and advertised by them since the beginning. In order to illustrate the sense of ownership Herbert applies at various of dates,“…first used in 1942...1954...summer of 1960 and it is our main thrust for 1970,” (lines 16-17). Utilizing the tone of condescension in the third section, Herbert’s tactic is to dismay ownership and rightful power to the slogan by emphasising the dates and seniority Coca-Cola has. Herbert’s stern and whiny tone of Coca-Cola being the first ones to have used the slogan does not necessarily provide a persuasive argument, unlike Richard Seaver. Seaver instead of just complaining uses a more sympathizing…
In the first case study- The cola war, the authors spend pages to state the competition history of the soft drink business, especially the cola business in America. However, I am not going to discuss the strategy change of each company, nor am I going to analyze the ranking change of each company. I find at some point of the development of soft drink companies, they violate the ethical issue in marketing- Market audience. Those companies target on the vulnerable – the children. When the definition of caffeine is brought on the table, only coke that contains caffeine can be called cola, and this is mandated by the Food and Drug Administration. Parents don’t want their children to have caffeine and be stimulated, so at this point the soft drink company Seven-up caught the opportunity and launched the non-caffeine drinks or even the “no artificial color” drinks. However I found this marketing strategy has some ethical issues, even customers don’t straggle with the definition of “no artificial color”, which seems impossible. As we know the ingredient of the coke, or the soft drinks is phosphoric acid, which can dissolve a nail in four…
1. The insight that Melissa Rubin gives the reader about the Coca-Cola ad is how the company persuades consumers to buy their product. Rubin analyzes gives us an idea who they are targeting for their product. The insight of Melissa Rubin collects evidence to comprehend what message the Coca-Cola Company is trying to sell/send. Beginning with the people who drink it and what they feel about it. The evidence Rubin gives us is by describing the ad and what the people represent and why they are there. The specific time period plays a big role and it impacts the evidence. World War II, American people who defended the United States celebrate with Coca-Cola glassed bottles. That is significant because it shows the hard work and effort the Americans ended the war. Another piece of evidence given to us was when the people are and that there was only white people. No black people were shown in the ad due to the segregation at the time. White males were shown as the majority. Women were a less important role in society. What this infers that the ad portrayed and approached the white males who wore uniforms were shown as the majority. Melissa Rubin persuaded me to her conclusions about the Coca-Cola ad because the evidence given is very accurate and connected with history when the ad was made.…
For decades Pepsi has defined itself through the wizardry of the slogan, the jingle and the storyboard and all that a succession of four ad agencies has spun from them. One hundred years after New Bern, N.C., druggist Caleb Bradham called it Pepsi-Cola (actually, Caleb Cola would have had a nice ring and spared Mr. Bradham the necessity of buying out an existing trademark, Pep-Kola, for the princely sum of $100), this worldly and sophisticated company still succumbs to the temptation to see itself as the ``feisty newcomer'' struggling in the shadow of tradition and Americana cast by ``the competitor.'' (Martin, 1962)…
Pendergrast, Mark. For God, Country, and Coca-Cola: The Unauthorized History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company That Makes It. New York: Macmillan, 1993.…
criticism of Coca-Cola from a range of campaigns using a variety of media over the…