Preview

Laws Should Be Silent In Times Of War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
442 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Laws Should Be Silent In Times Of War
Andrew Schwartz
2/18/13
US history 1 In times of war, laws are silent. Throughout every war there are legal issues that are brought to the table. These issues decide the fate of our country. The government must act fast to protect its citizens. Inter arma silent leges may seem unconstitutional but we deem it necessary because in the end, it comes to our benefit. Laws should be silent in times of war because it saved our union from falling apart, it allowed America to receive vital information, and allowed the united nations to win World War Two. During the civil war, the border stares were essential to the union. If they fell to the confederates, our capitol would be surrounded and we would lose the war. Rabble-Rousers spied on the


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The advent of the Fence Act was not the only force responsible for shaping the…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War in Ky Book Review

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    and pose great threat to the Confederacy. The Confederates made a futile attempt to impede the…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Act reins in the war-making authority of the president by demanding that the executive notify Congress within 48 hours after deploying the armed forces in combat. The presidents after Nixon have generally complied with the requirements of the Act, however they have all argued that the Act infringes on the president’s constitutional duty as Commander-in-Chief. They are well in their right to believe that, but many constitutional scholars maintain that Congress is within its right…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was concerned, Texas was still a territory of Mexico, and would remain such. This is…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing the Great Law of Peace and The Constitution of The United States of America…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did Polk’s choice of the border allow the United States to provoke a war with Mexico?…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wall Rhetorical Analysis

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Not everyone agrees with the with what is going on around them. They do not want the wall to be there. It does on create unity between all the individuals. Because the wall does not create unity, it creates an unwanted separation between the people. There is sympathy present all over the wall that stops and makes an individual think about other cultures way of life. Borders and walls can determine who a person is because where they come…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. Since the United States was brought into World War 1, there was a decision to put a draft into place, or demand to enroll into military services from any qualifying person during war time. In 1919, Schneck, an american citizen, spoke out against this war-time decision but was arrested for handing out circulars that encouraged draftees to oppose the draft, which violated the Espionage Act by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment . Schneck insisted that an arrest like this violated his First Amendment Right to freedom of Speech and Press. Ultimately, this case was brought all the way up to the Supreme Court, stating that during a time of war individual freedoms or rights can be limited or shrunken to protect national security. This case formed the phrase " clear and present danger". Supreme Court ruled that Schneck proposed a clear and present danger to american society. This is why we cant yell "fire!" in a movie theater or in any crowded public…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidently, there is an expression about “being caught between the Hawks and Buzzards” that a lot of older Arkansans may know. It is probably because they heard their relatives talk about it from the generations of relatives that fought on either side of the Civil War. What it shows is that states like Arkansas and Kentucky, which had normally been associated with the Southern states and their traditions, were somehow caught on the border between the Union states and the Confederate states. Some of their people were for slavery, while many were opposed to it. These borders often became the sites of great battles, which forced peacemakers on either side to have to choose sides.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe congress shouldn't restrict freedom of speech and freedom of press during times of war, because not only have we earned the right to speak our minds, it is also against the first amendment. The first amendement allows individuals to voice their opinion on the issue at hand, which is also a way to inform others. In addition, freedom of press is another way to inform the public of crucial matters, as well as providing information on the subject; however, at times the media can turn the matter into a joke. An example of this is SNL's portrayal of Republican nominee, Donald Trump, during the second presedential debate. In the sketch, SNL mocked him by portraying him as a hypocrite and a supremacist due to his responses to questions asked…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The War and the Writ Habeas corpus and security in an age of terrorism…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jordan-Ashley Pilkington Government 2305 Essay 1/Prompt 1 The Natural Rights Argument states that under natural law people have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, Jefferson called these rights the “unalienable rights” which could not be abridged by our government. No one is Sovereign under the Natural Rights Argument and no one can take away another’s life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness. The government is meant to be simply a tool of the Sovereign, and should work for the person's and not try to simply rule them. So the question is why can the government, Congress, declare war and not the people? Well, since we live in a democratic society with a “for the people, by the people mentality, it would be very dangerous for the people to act on their supremacy as it…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Back in the 1960's or so, people would get arrested or searched due to policeman having doubts or simply because they looked suspicious. Not a lot of people knew about the right to remain silent due to them not being aware of this act or police not telling them before the arrest or the search. Basically violating what the Bill Of Rights consisted of the fourth, fifth, sixth, and eight amendments which are the rights of the…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Revolutionary Era, our country knew that laws were necessary to protect our given rights and freedoms. Laws today still protect those rights, and it is our duty to live by them and defend them. Throughout history, unstable laws have been tested and found either vital for our humanity or detrimental. It is our jobs as citizens to abide by these laws as well as prove the necessity of how they are predicated. Our world is constantly changing in terms of social and political terms. Some may argue that the only way to preserve peace is to ignore worldly change and concur and pursue the government's laws.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays