Preview

Little River Flow Shoals Case Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
272 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Little River Flow Shoals Case Analysis
Analysis Questions:
1. What does the stream look like? Why did you choose the particular stream for the lab? The steam was high. Very high yes, I choose my local Ware Shoals.
2. What waterways are upstream that contribute flow to the stream (watershed)? The Little River flows into the Saluda from the north in Newberry County.
3. What is the land use? Roughly what percentage is forest or natural grass land? How much is urban? Agricultural? Ware Shoals is like a small town like Abbevile, SC. The population was 2,171. The lands there is about 4.015 miles squared. There is b it of agricultural there because it is a small town.
4. What are the factors that affect water quality of the stream? Are there industrial discharges directly to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the dominant soil type and potential land uses listed below, characterize the limitation for each…

    • 251 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conodoguinet Lab Report

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 101 mile long Conodoguinet Creek flows through about nine different municipalities, so testing for pollution and water quality is extremely important. To figure out the water quality of the creek however, we first needed to identify which tests to do. Realizing what the cause of pollution is, was our first problem. But, using prior knowledge of acid rain and eutrophication in Pennsylvania, we found out that those were, in fact, our main problems/causes of pollution in the Conodoguinet. When figuring out which specific tests needed to be completed in order to get an accurate water quality reading, we discovered that we had to evaluate different macroinvertebrates, test for pH, alkalinity, nitrates, phosphates, dissolved oxygen, etc. and also test the speed and velocity of the moving water.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rillito Creek, Arizona- An increase in precipitation. Mississippi and Wisconsin Rivers- result of global climate change. Colorado River, Glen Canyon Dam- an increase in precipitation.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The field trip to the Conodoguinet creek taught me a lot about water pollution. The results of the water we tested showed positive. On the scale the numbers shown below seven so the creek is not very polluted. This means the phosphates and nitrates are not high in the creek so the neutralise isn’t hurting anything. We saw some algae that was eutrophicating the richness of the pollution. The one thing our group did not see are crustaceans because the creek was fresh water. It was fun to investigate the waterlot in the conodoguinet…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bear Creek Lab Report

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tables 1 and 3 shows the measurements of the 10-meter stretch of Bear Creek that includes a pool and a riffle. The first table also shows the recorded time and weather in which our class collected the data during that particular day. The upper, middle, and lower transects are measured using meters. Each of the transects are first measured by width and then by depth on the: Left edge, mid-stream, and right edge. Then there is description on the substate and the site on both the upper and middle transect.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brush Creek Lab

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The nitrite count was .90 ppm, and nitrate count is .05 ppm. The conductivity was 210 while the turbidity was 21 inches. The pH for the creek was 7.8 and the water hardness was at 120 ppm. The alkalinity, the total chlorine and free chlorine were all at zero ppms. These results were not very good from the pollution aspect. All of these show that my hypothesis was not right about the site that we survey.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ENV 100 Week 3 DQ3

    • 422 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss the eutrophication of water in lakes and streams considering both point and nonpoint sources of pollution.…

    • 422 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.What is the urbanization rate here? What country the most/ least urbanized in this region…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Biology Chapter 50 Summary

    • 4384 Words
    • 18 Pages

    * Many streams and rivers have been polluted by humans, degrading water quality and killing aquatic…

    • 4384 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: In this experiment, the investigators have attempted to solve the questions of, “How polluted is U-High’s stream?” and, “How can water quality be measured?” They initially believed the creek to be of good quality. Many organisms within the water rely on dissolved oxygen, including fish, macroinvertebrates, and oxygen.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this experiment, the question being asked was: “What is the water quality of the U-High stream based on the water invertebrates found?” The purpose of this experiment was to determine the water quality of the U-High creek. The data was obtained by collecting soil, algae, and water from the U-High creek and identifying the number and types of invertebrates that were found from the samples. The prediction made was that the U-High creek’s water quality was poor based on the first observations of beer cans and other litter found near it, but the original hypothesis of the water quality being poor is rejected. There were three types of invertebrates found: pollution sensitive, pollution moderate tolerance, and pollution tolerance. Each of these groups resulted in having six different species found in the U-High creek. The pollution sensitive species included caddisflies, riffle beetles, stoneflies, mayflies, snipe larvae, and water penny larvae. The pollution moderate tolerance species included cranefly larvae, dragonfly…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. How and why does the human land use of the valley change as the river moves downstream and does this impact on the river?…

    • 3032 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We went to the Conodoguinet Creek to test the pollution levels of the creek. My hypothesis was If we check the pollution levels in the water, then we will find out that the water isn’t very polluted. You may be wondering, what are some of the causes of pollution? Well, the velocity of the water has a lot to do with the health. When the velocity of the water is faster, everything will be moving around more and there will more more dissolved oxygens. the mud and sediments won’t just stay there and it will just keep on moving so . Well, there are two main causes of pollution in the Conodoguinet creek, acidic rain and eutrophication. Eutrophication is the amount of nutrients in the water and it can be caused by runoff from land, sewage plants,…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. What environmental changes if any, can you identify in the case? What impact does this have…

    • 723 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Land use analysis is a means of broadly classifying how the particular land is being used. Each type of use has its own characteristic that can determine comparability, location and preference to other land uses in our study area. The land use analysis brings together consideration for…

    • 7696 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays