Michael Behe's Explanation For The Creation Of The Universe

Creationism is often disputed by philosophers and scientists about whether it is an acceptable explanation for the creation of the universe. The majority of scientists claim that there is no room for religion in the creation of the universe and that the creation can be explained only with science. However there are a small group of scientists that believe the God of classical theism had taken part in the creation of universe.

One example is Michael Behe. As a professor of biochemistry he believes that some aspects of the universe are too intricate to have just evolved through evolution. He focuses on the flagellum of bacterium, he argues that the flagellum is far too complex to have developed through evolution and therefore there must be someone who created something as complex. Behe concluded that the creator must be God. Another scientist that also uses God in a scientific explanation is modern physicist Paul Davies. He believes that the universe is special in the way it works according to mathematical principles; suggesting that there is evidence for God.
He believes that the theory of natural selection, proposed by Darwin, is sufficient enough to explain the complexity of the natural world. As an atheist, Dawkins does not believe in God and states that religion and science are completely different things. Many scientists use the Big Bang theory to suggest that the universe was not created by God but it’s creation can be explained by science. Some philosophers believe that the universe is self explanatory; Bertrand Russell being one of them. He believed that the universe is a brute fact: “It’s just there and that is