Preview

Nietzsche's Views On Freedom Of Will

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
819 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche's Views On Freedom Of Will
Every human being has a freedom of will, they are free to make whatever choices they desire. By freely making these choices, they are impacting how they will live their lives. Throughout the course of history, there have been many philosophers who have believed that humans do not have free will. However, inevitably humans do have freedom of will, whether individuals may believe so or not. A famous nineteenth century philosopher named Friedrich Nietzsche believed that human beings were not free. He believed human beings do not have freedom of will, rather that humans do not have a choice to make. Furthermore, he believed that everything is predestined for each human in society. Moreover, everything happens since a choice cannot be made …show more content…
He has been known throughout history for his not believing in a transcendent being and even claiming that ‘God is dead’. He believed that human beings act on their own desires, which leaves humans with ‘no choice’ when making a decision. Nietzsche does not believe that humans need God in order to fulfill human happiness. He believes this because when one removes this higher being or figure, individuals will act based on their feelings and desires, which helps them to have power in their choices. This is what separates a good human from a bad human. A good human is strong, while a bad human is weak. However, Nietzsche still believes that humans do not have a choice when faced with certain situations throughout the course of their lives. Again, he believes that freedom and responsibility are merely illusions and non-existent. Nietzsche thinks that humans are irresponsible because they lack the knowledge in thinking they are free, when in reality they are not. Due to this belief, Nietzsche also concludes that there is no meaning to life. Once you live life, everything is over, you die and that is the end. However, Nietzsche is wrong on his view of freedom of …show more content…
Nietzsche thought that pleasure was good while pain was bad, and that humans always choose pleasure over pain. However, that is not always the case. Even in the Bible it is written, “No testing has overtaken you that is not common to everyone. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tested beyond your strength, but with the testing he will also provide the way out so that you may be able to endure it”. Saint Paul speaks of enduring suffering in times of hardship. It is possible to be faced with a situation in which one is uncomfortable and might experience a time of suffering. However, this does not mean that one cannot endure and push through to become a stronger person. Take for example a student. A student must pass tests, in order to do well in his classes, to graduate and to get a good job. If the student does not wish to study for his tests, because that would cause him a great deal of suffering, then that could have a negative impact on how well that student does in his classes and in his future. That individual will ultimately face the consequences of his decision. He had a choice, a free choice, to study or to not study. He freely chose not to study, which resulted in not passing or graduating, and then possibly living a life that he does not desire. Nonetheless if suffering does indeed make one a stronger human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groundhog Day Analysis

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nietzsche was the one who explain that the notion of Affirmation of Life is say YES to life no matter what happens. He knows that it is important to be grounded in oneself and he had refused all temptation of seeking affirmation or knowing the meaning from outside, in the form of identity. What does it take to love like and every part of it, to encourage people to live the best life possible.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a theory shared by both Kierkegaard and Sartre. According to Alasdair MacIntyre, “For Sartre it sometimes appears as if each separate action expresses an individual choice. Even if I do not choose, I have chosen not to choose” (McIntyre). Yet, to live a truly authentic lifestyle one must reject outside opinions that could influence their decisions. As stated by Luke Mastin, “Friedrich Nietzsche further contended that the individual must decide which situations are to count as moral situations.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his Genealogy of Morals Nietzsche censures the members of the Judeo-Christian tradition for their "impotence." As a result of their impotence the descendents of this tradition (slaves, as I will call them to maintain some modicum of political correctness), have developed a hatred "to monstrous and uncanny proportions" (33). This hatred has had the end result of squelching the happiness and will to power‹two truly laudable elements of humanity‹that a truly strong individual might otherwise develop. While Nietzsche touches upon positive aspects of what he would like to see in the world in the Genealogy of Morals, he spends the majority of the work destructing the tradition that he views as having taken over the world. Nietzsche takes issue with two primary aspects of the Judeo-Christian tradition: its reactivity rather than creativity, and its celebration of suffering rather than joyful activity. He takes issue with both because they display a passivity that attacks rather than creates. Both allow humans to dwell on things that are not natural human impulses, and avoid willful creative activity. The great contradiction of the work is that in its expression Nietzsche shows a propensity for the same behavior he condemns. His entire work is a reactive, pessimistic attack on the western tradition‹a tradition he feels prey to. This contradictory expression brings his own philosophy under the axe that he has built, but first it demonstrates the way that suffering and reactivity are the natural human impulses he says they are not.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia defines morality as “a system of principles and judgments based on cultural, religious, and philosophical concepts and beliefs, by which humans determine whether given actions are right or wrong.” (Wikipedia Morality) Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, a German philosopher thought up of the idea that there are two moralities; The master and slave morality. These define a person by there actions to there world around them and how they handle certain situations they encounter throughout their natural life. I believe he chose these two because they seem to be strong opposites and there are rational.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality As Anti-Nature

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedrich Nietzsche, a prominent German philosopher in the 19th century is one of the most well-read philosophers of the past two-centuries. His ideas regarding morality and nature continue to be discussed and debated to this day among scholars of all beliefs.…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedrich Willhelm Nietzsche, a German Philosopher of the mid 1800`s was Born 1844 and died after a long medical condition that was thoroughly investigated but with no found result in 1900. Nietzsche is most renowned for challenging the moral integrity of Christianity in the late 1800’s despite having grown up with a background and family history of Lutheran ministers; where his Father, Uncles and Grandfathers were all Ministers. This philosopher was the most outspoken on topics such as power, pain, culture and moral acts, and from that has influenced some of the most commonly known philosophers we know of today; such as Sigmund Freud. Nietzsche viewed evil or immoral acts as “self-consciousness, free will and either/or bipolar thinking” (Curry, B. (2008). The Perspectives of Nietzsche. Retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/-wbcurry/nietzsche.html). Nietzsche believed that Evil is within and dependant upon the determinants that affect ones moral perception.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ”Freewill in terms of moral responsibility requires determinism to be true. Human actions are random and are not free if indeterminism is true. An action that requires character also requires determinism to be true. Ayer also defines freewill as unforced. A person would be free and morally responsible if their choices were not forced.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    . . “(The Genealogy of Morals). Nietzsche believed that man created religion to feel guilty. He believed that we're all animals who are violent and without a purpose. However, as an outlet for our cruel nature, man created a set of “morals” which we used to create a false sense of purpose and the understanding of life. Nietzsche’s discussion further shows us how often the “meaning of life” and the rules on how we must play our role is a manmade concept and does not show truth, therefore placing an overall value of one's life worth is far more…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Toothpaste critique

    • 762 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essay What’s in This Toothpaste? by David Bodanis. The audience/reader is informed about how toothpaste in made, the ingredients which are used to make just a bottle of tube and other alternatives that can be used if you opinion about toothpaste changes. The author talks about if toothpaste is something you should consider or keep using.…

    • 762 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work, Nietzsche introduces the concepts of Master and Slave Morality and with them, the problem of the Ascetic Ideal. Master morality is, in short, a morality of strength, individualism, and nobility that weighs actions on their consequences. Slave morality, on the other hand, values humility, sympathy, and kindness. It values actions based on whether their intent was one of “good” or “evil.” He links Slave morality to the moral codes of Christianity and emphasises that morality of “good” or “evil” is ultimately harmful. However, in modern times, Nietzsche believes that everyone experiences the struggle between Master and Slave morality.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It all happened the other night, while I was at the station working on some paper work. I believe it was Saturday. I got a call, and because I did not know what I was getting myself into... I answered the phone, it was the Bennett triplets, MEOW... they can talk! They went on and on and on about these... these mittens, they said they were missing, it was all a blur, they all talked over one another, something about pie... and I couldn’t really make much sense of it. Anyways I went to their house, and boy, this story is a little bit strange and was definitely a paw-ful.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The jurisprudence of distributive justice, according to juristic cynics, is an essay in illusion. The basic social system is built on gross inequalities and the power to lobby and mould State policy, even judicial policy, is heavily in the hands of the proprietariat. Being social realists and meliorists we have to work with the materials that we have and try to read the constitutional provisions in such a manner that the human essence of distributive justice is won by dynamic interpretation and socialist understanding. The Indian Constitution visualizes an affirmative State action for bringing about a new social order based on justice, social, economic and political (Art. 38). The Directive Principles of State Policy contain the directions of change towards such a new social order. The researcher has examined various theories of justice and has examine how the John Rawl’s theory of justice which means that justice is fairness is the most apt for the Indian situation. Even in the Constitution we find different strategies of justice.…

    • 4950 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays