He was a man who was known to have a thing for a practical revolution, a revolution for peasants and the lower class of Mexican people. He was in opposition to Madero in the sense that Madero was against a land reform, but Emiliano Zapata had invented a Plan de Ayala, which came into action in 1911. Mr. Zapata was fighting for the political, and the social powers of the lower class of Mexico. The lower class consisted of peasants, workers with a minimum wage, and abandoned people. Zapata had always said that “It was better to die a man, than to die running like a coward.” He was a man who enjoyed standing up for what he truly believed in. He wanted the lower class to stand up, and believe in something. Mr. Zapata although really didn’t have a great deal of influence in the works of returning land to the peasants that was taken over by others. He was the man who represented the lower class. Emiliano Zapata and Francisco Madero were huge foes because Madero was against giving back land to the “lower class.” Madero didn’t give the land back, even though this went against his original promise where he said he would. Emiliano Zapata despite his great efforts to fight what he believed in, and get back what the people wanted, ultimately fell short because the land he wanted back so desperately was never returned to Mexico’s “lower …show more content…
Francisco was very keen on establishing a democratic government, which was and is a government that is similar to the one we have to the United States. In fact, the United States couldn’t be happier with this idea. The U.S had than placed an embargo of arms that would oppose any of Francisco’s foes. But eventually, the government in Mexico split and had become liberals and had desired a change for politics and the new fighters craved more social and economic reforms. This was an issue that Francisco Madero would than run into because he couldn’t provide what the liberals, and what some people wanted. In regards to the ongoing reformations, Francisco Madero was dealing with many reforms regarding land and labor. The reforms were going through confirmation processes that were through the National Agrarian Commission firstly, and the Department of Labor. Many liberals and groups that were for labor were feeling confident because they were now granted the right the right to then publish some newspapers on their own now. They had only ran into one issue, and this was that Madero had now refused to agree to many social reforms that regarded appropriate hours for work operations, and wages, also working conditions and hazards at work were accounted for. Francisco Madero’s organization and staff had begun a steep decline. He was losing many of his supporters, and the people fighting