Cited: "Doubt." Law & Order: SVU. WNBC-TV, 2006. Television.
Cited: "Doubt." Law & Order: SVU. WNBC-TV, 2006. Television.
She began by explaining that Julie Schenecker sent an email to her mother that made her mother feel uneasy and want to call the police. The Assistant public defender explained that the police would be testifying to the events that happened January 2011. When the police arrived they knocked on the door and no one answered so they looked in through the window to see Schenecker laying outside on the back patio. She notes that the police explain the defendant looked as though she had been sleeping for a very long time and that it was a very cool January morning. To cool for her to be sleeping outside in her robe. That investigation quickly turned from a welfare check into a homicide investigation. Ms. Spradley attempted to paint a picture of the events that happened that day to be one of a loving mother who was mentally unstable. She explained that when the police found Schenecker and woke her to question her that Schenecker was unstable and had to be held up while sitting on the couch. She explained that when the police asked her where her children were Schenecker told them that she tucked her daughter in bed and that she tried to pick her son up and put him in her bed, because thats where he slept the soundest when his father was away, but she could not move him so she left him in the vehicle and tucked a blanket around him. Ms. Spradley attempts to make Schenecker seem like an all…
Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury, we are here today to decide the verdict of an alleged aggravated sexual assault on January 8th, 2010. The plaintiff, Ms. Shirley Thompson, states that my client, Mr. Michael Miller, abducted her at knife point and raped her twice. My client has given a statement that he did in fact have sexual intercourse with her, but it was consensual.…
Jennifer Thomas, a 22-year old college student from Burlington, North Carolina, was raped in her off-campus apartment on July 28, 1984. During the assault, Jennifer studied her rapist’s face and other characteristics in the case that she made it out alive. Thomas was able to escape and ran to a police station and with the help of a detective, she was able to make a composite sketch of the perpetrator. The rapist also managed to rape another woman a few blocks down from Thomas’s apartment. Once the sketch was release to the public, tips came in about a man named Ronald Cotton. Cotton had a record of sexual assault and breaking and entering. A photo spread was done and Jennifer Thomas identified Ronald Cotton…
In the early 1980’s in a small Podunk town of Ada, Oklahoma, a young woman named Debra Sue Carter, was savagely raped and killed in her own apartment after work at the local cocktail bar. Quickly, the town drunk was arrested in relation to the rape and murder with nothing more than a single “eyewitness” that placed him at the woman’s job that night. Many regulars to the bar said that “they would know if Ron Williamson was at the Coach Light and he wasn’t there.” They, in fact, named another man: Glenn Gore, the prosecution's main witness. Gore was also the man that Debbie’s friend said that she was afraid of and he was supposedly at Debbie’s apartment the night of the murder, according to the friend who received a phone call that night from Debbie. Gore was also seen being pushed away by the victim at the victim’s car the same night as the murder.…
The court said that it the defendant’s overt acts were sufficient to support the inference that he intended to rape the victim:…
On April 3, Victoria Price was called to the stand to testify. She recounted her job-hunting trip to Chattanooga, the fight on the train between the white and the colored, and the rape in which Haywood Patterson was one of her attackers. She claimed that six raped her, and three raped Ruby Bates. Prosecutor Knight’s strategy was mainly to make sure his questions would keep to Victoria’s story, and so it did not change from her first story of the incident. When Samuel S. Leibowitz questioned her, however, it was merciless. His questions suggested his answers. Victoria had claimed that she stayed at Callie Brochie’s boardinghouse in Chattanooga the night before, but that was proved false. There wasn’t such a place. Leibowitz proved that she was an adulterer who had consorted with Jack Tiller, a married man, in the Huntsville freight yards two days before the alleged…
Wrightsman, L. E., Kassin, S.M, Willis, C.E (Ed.). (1987). In the jury box: Controversies in…
Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…
The non-fiction book The Innocent Man by John Grisham is about Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz who were wrongly conivcted for the murder of Debbie Carter in Ada, Oklahoma in 1986. Grisham argues that Bill Peterson, the prosecuting attorney and his team, did a bad job. Peterson created a website to respond to Grisham’s book defending his position about the event. Most of Peterson’s writings are an attempt to convince us that he had made no mistake on the case. Although Grishm’s point of view is convincing and innocents were harmed, justice was done by getting the right man in the end.…
Teresita went to a fraternity party because she'd heard that this fraternity "really knew how to have fun" and she really needed fun after a disastrous academic week. She knew that some women had been taken advantage of at previous parties, but she put that out of her mind, as she downed one drink after another. Just when things were getting dull, the coolest guy on campus took her by the hand, led her upstairs and talked her into having sex. The next day, Teresita noticed that her vagina was bruised and bleeding. She barely recalled having sex, but knew who was responsible for her condition, and filed rape charges against him with the campus administrator.…
It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…
Erdely, R.S. (2008). The date-rape ‘doctor’ they could not convict: 10 women charged him with…
Throughout this paper, I will discuss the concept of the ideal rape victim and discuss both sides of this debate, whether it is true or untrue. I will discuss examples as to why it is true that the ideal rape victim works today, beginning from the concept of rape in the 1800 's to discussing myths and stereotypes around rape. The creation of the Rape Shield Laws, and how it played a significant role in the judicial system regarding consent and credibility. As well as draw from examples from Crenshaw regarding intersectionality, to how race plays a factor in rape to Larcombe 's argument about the definition of the ideal…
The story begins with a fifty-two-year-old professor David Lurie claiming that his mind has solved the problem of sexual desire. He describes this to be accomplished through weekly sexual relations with a “honey-brown” prostitute. When his first solution fails, he begins an “affair” with a student thirty years his junior. Throughout the narration of this “affair” it is heavily implied that the woman was at one point raped by her professor. After a complaint was…
What makes these findings most troubling, according to Kassin and Gudjonsson, is the strong correlation between false confession and wrongful conviction. Trial jurors, we are told, are inclined to give disproportionate weight to a confessions, even taking it to outweigh so-called “hard evidence.” As a characteristic example, Kassin and Gudjonsson cite the case of Bruce Godschalk. Even when DNA evidence proved Godschalk could not have been the rapist, the District Attorney of the case refused to release him from prison, stating that “…I trust my detective and his tape-recorded evidence” (Kassin and Gudjonsson, 2005, p. 28). Because of this tendency on the part of jurors and prosecutors, together with the facts listed above…