Preview

Pros And Cons Of Banning Guns

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1130 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Banning Guns
1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, & Chicago cops need guns.

2. Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.

3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are “just statistics.”

4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994 are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.

5. We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.
…show more content…
A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should “put up no defense – give them what they want, or run” (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don’t Die – People Do, 1981, p. 125).

10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns & Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.

11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems, and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.

12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to the National Guard, which was created 130 years later, in 1917.

13. The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a “state” militia.

14. These phrases: “right of the people peaceably to assemble,” “right of the people to be secure in their homes,” “enumerations herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people,” and “The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people” all refer to individuals, but “the right of the people to keep and bear arms” refers to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    iii. Approval of use and own guns should only be limited to police officers ect.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 2 Amendment states that American citizens have the right to bear arms (own a gun).…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of firearm. The FBI reports that more than 60 percent of murders are caused by guns and…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pavlo

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Gun control proponents have argued and some federal courts have ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to individual citizens of the United States but only to members of militias, which, they assert, are now the state National Guard units. In 2002, a federal appeals court panel ruled that "the people" only "have the right to bear arms in the service of the state.” Gun rights proponents have argued and some federal courts have ruled that the Second Amendment recognizes "an individual right to keep and bear arms." In 2001, a federal appeals court panel ruled that the Second Amendment "protects the right of individuals, including those not then actually a member of any militia or engaged in active military service or training, to privately possess and bear their own firearms..” James Madison was the primary author of the Bill of Rights, is known as the "Father of the Constitution" for his central role in its formation, and was one of three authors of the Federalist Papers, a group of essays published in newspapers and books to explain and lobby for ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do most of 19 different major varieties of gun control laws appear to have no impact, with a few exceptions, on the types of violence which frequently involve guns? Many explanations are suggested by both our own results and those of prior research. First, some gun laws are intended to have their effects by reducing gun ownership levels, so some gun laws may fail because they do not achieve their proximate goal of reducing gun ownership (Table IVA). However, our results also generally indicate that gun prevalence levels do not have a net positive effect on violence rates (top row, Table IVB). Consequently, gun laws may fail simply because, even if they did reduce gun prevalence, this would not produce a reduction in violence rates.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Specific Goal: I want my audience to understand that gun control is not the answer to crime rates, suicide and homicide, but rather better and more mental health recognition and help and gun safety awareness.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wording in the Bill of Rights supports citizens in having the individual right to bear arms. The Second Amendment includes the term “the right of the people” which is used frequently throughout the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and most commonly indirectly refers to individual rights. The Second Amendment also references pre-existing individual rights with the statement of “shall not be infringed” which is a possible reference to the 1689 English Bill of Rights in which English citizens were allowed to bear arms (French 2-3). Individual liberties granted to citizens are directly stated in neither the Bill of Rights nor the Constitution. The controversy on whether the Second Amendment was meant to be a collective right is eliminated with the analyzation of the wording presented in the Bill of Rights, thus, stripping the Second Amendment would be a violation of individual…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (law.cornell.edu). These twenty-seven words are the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Where did this amendment come from? How did the founding fathers of the United States come up with this? This paper will show the foundation of where the Second Amendment came from, how it became an amendment, and what happened after the amendment went into effect.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass Shooting Memo

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a sense, that does make sense. After many of the mass shootings when they are trying to determine the reason the shooter would go to extreme measures to hurt people a lot of times they will say it was the cause of a mental illness (Metzl). It is hard for everyday people to pick up on signs that may show that another person may be struggling mentally. If we made mental health programs more available, more affordable, and educate parents of certain signs they should look for we could possibly get someone help. It could also be a possibility to make it a requirement to go through a mental health evaluation before obtaining a gun. Our citizen’s safety is important and we need to take measures to protect everyone’s…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Second Amendment

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The debate surrounding this amendment has been to determine if the first portion of this sentence “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state”, is a restrictive or subordinate clause in regards to the continuation of the sentence being “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. In order to better analysis the true element of this amendment it is best for one to relieve themselves of their personnel opinions regarding the Second Amendment, gun control, or any other political subject which may bare weight upon the individual’s analysis of the subject. In regards to the argument that the Second Amendment solely grants the right to keep and bear arms to a well-regulated militia is somewhat deplorable; since the sentence does not truly restrict the right, nor does it affirm or imply possession to any particular group. This sentence truly only exists to make a positive declaration of respect to a right for the people. The second portion of this sentence “The right of the people to keep and bear arms” does not truly grant the right to the people, however, its existence is more assumed as preexisting; the substance of this sentence is that these rights shall be…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why do people keep guns? These days many people own and carry guns with them in the name of security and protection. Many people own guns such as rifles and shotguns for the sport of hunting. The government allows people to own and carry guns by having a background check and getting a permit, but there are many private gun sellers who sell guns without any background checks and giving permits. The possession of guns should be strictly banned because they are the sign of violence, they have increased the rates murders and insecurity, and even many children have killed other children.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States code described that militias are always subject to federal, state or local government control. It also described a “private” militia or army not under government control could be considered illegal and in rebellion, and as a result is subject to harsh punishment.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ,while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them.Gun control laws are simply ineffective and they have an adverse effect on crime. Instead of reducing crime, gun control laws just simply take guns out the hands of good people and puts the guns into the hands of the bad guys.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics