Preview

Pros And Cons Of Pro Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Pro Death Penalty
Pro Death penalty Men losing their lives, women losing their innocence and children living their lives without their parents or living their lives without a family to care for them and love them as they grow up. Over 131.4 million people are born each year and over 55.3 million people die or are killed each year, when the death penalty was enforced only half of that amount of people had been killed by murders. So the death penalty should be enforced in more locations. The death penalty has been changed and has become more humane when executing the inmate, not immoral as everyone cuts it out to be and it cost less to enforce the death penalty than to keep an inmate in prison for the rest of his or her entire life. The death penalty is now executed with a more humane way of killing or executing the inmates or criminals. The death penalty has now been created in a more humane and peaceful way of being executed. Back when the way a criminal or inmate was killed was by being killed by a firing squad or by being decapitated in the town center. The new death penalty way of going through is that the inmate will be injected with a formula or gas that puts them to a sleep like state to where the inmate doesn’t feel the pain of being shot or electricity to death (Evan). Money is something that is a very …show more content…
For the gas or formula to be produce would cost less than to keep a criminal alive and health inside of a prison cell. The death penalty only cost 1 to 2 million to be produce and then to send to the prison then for the criminal to been injected with the gas ( Frank zimring) . If the prison would offer LWOP (life without pay) it will be more expensive than to just produce the gas for the inmate to receive his punishment ( Simon). Men and women think that punishing a murderer for his crimes is wrong and is immoral even though that person has done an unforgivable act and takens someone

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate on the pros and cons of the death penalty has gone on for decades. There are some people who oppose the death penalty because they fell it is a system that is so flawed that it serves no purpose. For instance, those against the death penalty believe that this sentence has the potential for an error because it is possible that the wrong person can be executed. Unfortunately, there is no way for those who decide who is guilty to always be 100 percent accurate.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patricia Cornwell once said “First of all, it does not deter crime, the death penalty.” So why was it made in the first place? Well, many believe that with this system we can eliminate atrocious criminals such as Timothy McVeigh, a young man who bombed Oklahoma City taking the lives of 168 people, who was later executed. This definitely helps in removing that one criminal, but what about the other thousands? If the death penalty were enforced in Canada then it not only do so but also increase our taxes, put innocent lives at risk, and in all reality have no effect on murder rates. Why would you want to let such a problematic sentencing be legalized in such a fine country like ours.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros to the death penalty are that it protects innocent people and that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. Sentencing convicted murderers with the death penalty we are protecting inmates, guards, and people outside the prison. If we do not sentence convicted murderers with the death penalty and instead sentence them with life we are giving them the opportunity to murder while in prison. A statistic shows that by executing convicted murderers we are saving from three to eighteen innocent lives. The death penalty serves as a deterrent because without the death penalty there would be a lot more murderers. This is so because a lot of people do not commit murder in fear of the death penalty and those who have committed murder would…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder is defined as the killing of one human being by another. Murderers should receive the death penalty, unless self-defense was a following factor. The killing of an innocent human being should never be something someone gets away with; no one should have to right to live after taking the life of another. However, the death penalty is known to be a “lethal lottery” and is applied at random. Therefore, I believe separate institutions should be constructed throughout the United States to separate average criminals from murderers.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moreover, there is a tremendous contrast of price tags between capital punishment and a life sentence without parole. In some cases, the costs of executing a defendant triples the regular cost of life in jail. For the reason being there are extended procedures, higher cost of trials and heavier lawyer fees, an upsetting and excessive amount of money taken from the pockets of taxpayers. That is to say it is estimated to cost three million dollars for the average death penalty and by eliminating it and opting for life sentences would save hundreds millions dollars annually in which can then be devoted to other areas such as healthcare or education. Despite the price we pay for the sustenance of the system, it does not impede crime rates and contrary…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Citizens’ tax money is used by courtrooms to carry out the executions. According to the article, Judge McCartin Turns against Death Penalty by Gordon Dillow explains the execution of inmates is: “It's a waste of time and taxpayers' money.” Judge McCartin acknowledges that, "It cost 10 times more to kill these guys than to keep them alive in prison.” Unfortunately, D.P cases occur a lot since the courtrooms come up with erroneous jurisdiction over inmates’ cases: The judicial system spends taxpayers money in revising documents, evidences, and appeals. For instance, the book Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean compares the prisoners’ execution costs more than life imprisonment in the state of Florida: “the cost of an each execution is approximately $3.18 million, compared to the cost of life imprisonment for (40 years) about $516,000” (129). These quotes assimilate in clarifying that it is cheaper to hold the inmates alive in prison rather than execute prisoners and invest high amounts of money on…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my personal opinion I think that the death penalty is important because it will lower the cost of our taxes because we will not have to pay as much to hold life sentencing inmates, which will improve the economy, I think that if the consequence for a serious felony may be death the crime rates will decrease, I also believe that it will make our streets safe and will allow us to create more jobs because there will need to be more law enforcement jobs that will be needed…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty uses an unnecessary amount of America’s budget. The amount of money we spend on the death penalty could be put to better use. “Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 more than an ordinary…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It takes only a $100 for a lethal injection and it takes over $47000 to keep someone in jail for a year. Multiply that with 25 and you $1175000 which are innocent citizens tax money which can go to something way better. $1175000 is only 25 years it's not even a life sentence. Which is another reason for the death penalty to be legal since canada's life sentence is only 25 years the criminals can come out of jail and try to hurt the victim's family for revenge.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that execution is cheaper for society than a life sentences. They think that it cost nothing for someone to be given the death penalty. They also believe that keeping someone in prison for a long amount of time…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is an execution used as a punishment on someone convicted of a capital crime. There are several ways in which these executions have been or are being made. The most common is the lethal injection, others being electrocution, hanging, lethal gas, gas chamber, and/ or the firing squad under limited circumstances. The death penalty was first used in the U.S. in colonial times therefore leading to more than 900 executions since the year of 1976 in the U.S., with the state of Texas leading the nation (“At Issue”). There are many pros and cons that are discussed about this topic that are justifiable depending on the different points of view. Some people believe that the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Death Penalty

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page

    Life in prison is not a punishment. Not for people guilty of violent murders. They have access to way to many comforts that they do not deserve. When criminals kill, they lose their own rights. They are subjected to whatever punishment that crime is worthy of.…

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abolish Death by Execution

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If what we have is not completely useless, it is far less suitable than an option that is more practical by means of cost. Here is the referencing of the death penalty by execution and why it should be abolished in the state of Florida. Currently in the state, we have two forms of a death sentence: death by prison and death by execution. Each of these death sentences have the same overall meaning, those who are sentenced will never likely exit prison alive. Death penalty by execution should be outlawed based on how it stands both on moral arguments pointing out that innocent people may and have been executed. This paper will demonstrate the economic argument that death by prison is a more cost effective option than death by execution.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays