Preview

Sadat and Keating Essay Draft

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sadat and Keating Essay Draft
Speeches Essay
Intro:
Throughout history, the language of rhetoric has been harnessed and manipulated by public speakers throughout the world in order to effectively address key issues surrounding society and politics. The proposition that the enduring appeal of a speech lies in its ability to challenge and inspire is clearly demonstrated in both Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” (1977) and Paul Keating’s “Funeral Service for the Unknown Soldier” (1993). It is indeed the rhetorical treatment of the widely debated values in these speeches- whether it be for peace between two nations or simply the need for a stronger sense of national identity- that makes both these texts so influential in their enduring appeal.

Sadat’s Speech:
In the light of the four year war preceding his speech which Sadat had evidently implemented, the Prime Minister of Egypt’s address to the Israeli Knesset-an audience which involved not only enemy politician’s but Israelis’ who were personally involved in the war- was indeed one of the most challenging and influential speeches in history. Through the language of rhetoric, Sadat draws upon religious, political and personal motivations in order to propose to the Israeli Knesset a solution for peace to end the age long conflict between the Egypt and Israel.
Beginning his speech, Sadat employs the use of religious allusion and pathos in order to set the foundations of his argument to bring unity to both countries through the use of a universal God who loves all and wishes for peace- “We all, Muslims, Christians and Jews, worship god…Gods’ teachings and commandments are love, sincerity, purity and peace.” Making use of inclusive language, Sadat makes sure to note that he speaks on the behalf of Egypt, who like himself, also seek peace with the rival Israelis – “We really and truly welcome you to live amongst us in peace and security”.
Throughout his speech, Sadat draws upon religious similarities to sedate the cultural friction

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout time society has been presented with very unique and moving leaders who have successfully delivered speeches that will remain timeless and invaluable due to their powerful themes and beliefs portrayed within them. Speeches such as Faith Bandler’s “Hope, Faith and Reconciliation” and Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” will always remain significant within society and will never become dependent on shaping today’s society but be a memory of our past and a reminder of who we are today. Only very few texts still remain today that are highly regarded as being timeless and have the ability to still be understood in today’s society. I believe this is attributed to the underlying significant themes and ideas such as justice that will continue to appeal to people and allow them to sympathise with the author disregarding the time period. The themes behind the everlasting texts give the audience to have a universal perception and interpretation that can differ depending on external factors and ways of life. Another important reason of why I believe these texts have the ability to shape our interpretations of them are because of the pivotal nature and characteristics that the speeches hold in our past that has developed and crawled into our future.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Atwood’s Spotty-Handed Villainesses (1994) and Anwar Sadat’s Statement to the Knesset (1977) are both speeches worthy of critical study because of their fascinating ideas and values.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All great speeches evoke emotions and provoke thought in order to engage their audience. Through rhetorical treatment of human aspirations and beliefs speakers are able to ignite thought, stir emotions and in some cases even inspire their audiences to take action. This concept is evident in Paul Keating’s speech ‘Funeral For An Unknown Soldier’ (1993) and even more so in Noel Pearson’s speech ‘An Australian History For All Of Us’ (1996). The following interpretation of these two prescribed speeches will show how each speaker has used rhetorical devices to inspire emotion, thought and action but firstly it is important to know the context of these speeches in order to understand the impact they have on their audiences.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    These two speeches through their enduring power of intellectual and artistic qualities connected and compelled their audiences to reassess and challenge the message within their speeches. “Statement to the Knesset” (1977) by Anwar Sadat, using biblical references, forces audiences to see and envisage the wonders of his unified narrative for social, cultural and political change. Throughout the speech “Statement to the Knesset” (1997) by Anwar Sadat, his themes and ideas can be seen through his enduring power and artistic qualities, and his audiences are emotionally and intellectually engaged and thus more responsive to Sadat’s deliverance of their own views on their beliefs and aspirations. “Spotty-Handed Villainesses” (1994) by Margaret Atwood, using subversive irony and humour, forces her audiences to deconstruct the deception of ‘evil’ women within literature and with her enduring power engages her audiences in cries for the dismantling of social gender roles. The speeches set for study mould responders into co-authors whereby being engaged by the speeches enduring power of their intellectual and artistic qualities, and their audiences embrace the speeches worthy messages. Thus both speeches continue to be valid in the present day.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Undoubtedly, a speaker moulds his/ her speech by the principles of purpose, and the audience who are to receive the given speech. More than this however- the responder’s context also shapes the way in which they interpret a speech. Michael Douglas- famed actor and movie director, contrasts an audience’s response in his quote, to emphasise that a responder’s context is vitally significant. The speeches “Faith, hope, reconciliation” and “An Australian history for us all,” written by Faith Bandler and Noel Pearson respectively- draw many similarities and contrasts with regards to issues raised, audience, intention and context. Both acclaimed speakers articulate their speeches through the use of various rhetoric devices, tones and stylistic techniques in order to appeal to their audience.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anwar Sadat’s 1977 speech “statement to the Knesset” demonstrates a fundamental understanding of the Israeli - Arab conflict, as addressed to the Israeli government. Sadat, through use of rhetorical techniques, creates an empathetical connection with both primary and secondary audiences, as demonstrated firmly through implementation of inclusive pronouns, purposeful generalisation, and overwhelming use of high modality language. Through a manipulation of these techniques, Sadat explores the complexity of human desire, as his call for a durable and just peace comments on the concept of interpersonal relations, through repetitious use of inclusive literary techniques, phrases, and generalisations. The overall effect of Sadat’s literary techniques…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    module B essay

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Speeches form an interpretation of historical events and values which are moulded around the speaker's opinions and ideology. Paul Keating's 'Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier' 1993 and Noel Pearson's 'An Australian History for Us All' 1996, demonstrate a contrast between how a historical and contextual understanding of these speeches helps create the necessary apperception on the given audience to convey the speaker's message appropriately. Despite the fact that both speeches were given in the mid 1990s, they were addressed to different types of audiences; Pearson's being delivered to a small, highly academic audience, while Keating's was broadcasted to the entire nation. They also addressed differing topics addressing patriotism within Australian society; the history of Indigenous mistreatment, and Australian participation in war, and were therefore perceived quite individually.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Arab Republic of Egypt. Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement. Sharm El Sheikh: Egypt, 2009. Web. 12 Nov 2010. .…

    • 1926 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two Australian Speeches

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An orator’s ability to utilise speech structure permits them to not only convey their ideas efficiently, but also to help achieve a social change and improvement. This notion of social change is at the heart of any successful speech. The idea of “parts to the whole” is shown in both Paul Keating’s Funeral Service of the Unknown Soldier and Margaret Atwood’s Spotty Handed Villainesses. The structure and language of a speech are important aspects as they let the orator provide their argument in an effective way and thus bring about a social change in a number of ways that are pertinent to the audience and context.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module B Speeches

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Powerful speeches affirm universal values which remain prevalent in human nature’s aspiration to productively approach the future. Noel Pearson’s speech “An Australian history for us all” (1996) and Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” (1977), through effective use of rhetorical devices, creates textual integrity to explore visionary ideas: establishing the need for change by examining “the past, with all its complexities”, and that in overcoming past conflict and uniting for a common goal, a “bold drive towards new horizons” may be undertaken.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I Have A Dream Analysis

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The “Gettysburg Address” was presented by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War in 1863. The “I Have a Dream” speech was presented during the March on Washington during the Civil Rights Movement in 1963. These speeches, even one-hundred years difference in time when given, they both address a common theme for freedom and equality. The “Gettysburg Address” purpose was to urge and give hope to his audience to continue to fight for the Union so America would not perish and the “I Have a Dream” purpose of demanding an urgent change for equality for all. This paper will examine how each speaker uses rhetorical devices to attain their purposes.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Speeches Essay/

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An intrinsic connection between reality and what can become reality is made obvious by notions presented through rhetorical devices. This is seen in Anwar Sadat's speech "Statement to the Knesset", through a succinct presentation that remains strong without a sense of belligerence, allowing in tern for a sense of unification and a call for peace. He accomplishes this throughout the speech by escalating his tone alongside constant frequent reference to religion, grouping Islam, Christianity and Judaism together in his plea for peace "We all, on this land, the land of God; we all, Muslims, Christians and Jews, worship God and no one but God." which brings a great sense of unity especially through the use of the inclusive "we all" phrase. This is somewhat the reality of the situation, but does not manifest itself enough (in Anwars belief) within the social consciousness - so it ends up being the possible. This is furthered at the conclusion of the speech, through the utilisation of the personal pronoun of "I" and the inclusive "we" repeatedly. This choice of language contributes strongly to the escalating strength of the speech by pulling the audience in as one, achieving a sense of unification. He believes it is possible that complete unity can be achieved, and he is attempting to attains this unity within his speech. So an intrinsic connection between the actual and the possible revealed through the development of ideas in the speech. This is presented and made stronger through the rhetorical devices.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this section, I want to focus on the rhetoric used in speeches that were delivered during this intense referendum. Delivering good speeches is an important part of a successful campaign, as they allow each political party to voice their opinions, publish statements and therefore to convince people of their motives.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Gettysburg Address” by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and “I Have a Dream” by Doctor Martin Luther King Jr given during the March on Washington. These speeches both have common themes, freedom and equality and they both have rhetorical devices to emphasize the purpose. The purpose of the “Gettysburg Address” is to tell the people to continue the fight. The purpose of the “I Have of Dream” speech is to tell the people to demand their rights. This paper will analysis the two speeches and how they use rhetorical devices to emphasize their purpose.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays