Preview

Separation of Power in India

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3906 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Separation of Power in India
SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, PUNE

Legal research and methodology

“SEPARATION OF POWER IN INDIAN CONTEXT”
“FUNCTIONAL OVERLAPPING”

Submitted by: Prashant Kumar Singh, LL.M. 1st yr. Roll No. 35, SLS, Pune

Separation of powers in Indian context:
1-“Doctrine of separation of powers is structural rather than functional.”
2-In India not only there is a ‘functional overlapping’ but there is ‘personnel overlapping’ also.
Abstract:
The Supreme Court applies the structural provisions of the Constitution by relying on an
Overarching framework of “separation of powers.” In Indian Constitution, there are mentioned provisions in relation to separation of power but there is functional overlapping.
These theories rely on a freestanding separation of powers principle derived from the structure of the document as a whole, both contradict the idea that the Indian Constitution is a “bundle of compromises” that interpreters must respect if they are to show fidelity to the Constitution making process. The historical record reveals that the founding generation had no single baseline against which to measure what “the separation of powers” would have required in the abstract.

Doctrine of Separation of Powers in India:
Development:
In India, the doctrine cannot claim any historical background. The legislature did not appear as a body separate from the executive till the middle of 19th century. The doctrine of separation of powers has not been accorded a constitutional status. It was only after the independence that a



Bibliography: [ 12 ]. AIR 1990 SC 1277: (1990) 3 SCC 223. [ 13 ]. AIR 2003 SC 739: (2003) 2 SCC 45: (2003) 1 KLT 192. [ 17 ]. 1959 SCR 229: see also Jayanti Lal v S.M. Ram, AIR 1964 SC 649. [ 21 ]. (1975) supp SCC 1, 260. [ 22 ]. (1975) supp SCC 1: AIR 1975 SC 2299. [ 23 ]. (1973) 4 SCC 225: AIR 1973 SC 1461.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Assignment 1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concepts of separation of powers and checks and balances were originally articulated by the French philosopher, Montesquieu. They then became a cornerstone in the political thinking of the English philosopher, John Locke. Locke in turn had a major impact on the writers of the US Constitution, who incorporated his ideas into that document. a. What is the key principle of the separation of powers? What value does it serve in the governance of democracies? b. What is the meaning of the concept of checks and balances? How do checks and balances help prevent tyrannical…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers instilled checks and balances among the branches so that tyranny was an impossibility and good government would be in place. They were protected from each other by constitutional means because if one branch was out of line one of the other two was capable of shutting down the unconstitutional actions of the converse branch. For example, the legislative branch could make laws, but they executive had to approve of them in order for them to be set in place. However, if the president vetoed a bill the legislative could overturn the veto if two-thirds of the house and senate believed the bill was constitutional and beneficial for society. Also, the Founders instilled office positions in government with great power so that the positions would appeal to ambitious people. Man’s personal motives prevented tyranny because if ambitious people were in power they would have great incentive to abide by the Constitution and keep their position because they wanted to continue to posses this power. Human ambition is part…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All powers, legislative, executive, judicial, are separate branches (Doc B). This is so one person or group cannot accumulate all of these powers and become an absolute ruler. The three separate branches can check on each other (Doc C). Since they are separate, they have different powers that can act against each other, assuring that one branch can’t always get their way. One branch can make a decision but might need another branch to approve it. For example, only Congress can make laws, but the president must approve them, in order for them to actually become a law. Separation of powers helps guard against tyranny, by making sure one group or individual can’t obtain enough power to become a supreme…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second guard against tyranny is the separation of powers, which organizes the different departments within each government in such a way that each branch is separate from each other, and have different duties to carry out. Document C states that "The accumulation of all powers...in the same hands,…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    fish

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Define separation of powers and checks and balances. Give an example of how these ideas work in the U.S government. Separation of powers is the principle that divides power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. Checks and balances is the system in which each branch of the government has the power to monitor and limit the actions of the other two. They both work to make sure a tyranny doesn’t occur in government and with that said the separation of powers separates the governments power and checks and balances gives each branch the power to limit the actions of the other two.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A separation of powers is where not all the power is given in one place, instead, it is divided between three different branches. This worked because the people did not want a tyrant to rule the country, instead the power is divided up in our three different branches of our government. The Legislative (Article Ⅰ), Executive (Article Ⅱ), and Judicial Branch (Article Ⅲ). Article Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ of the Constitution lists the powers and limits to the power of the government. The legislative branch has the power to make laws while the executive branch carries out and enforces…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Separation of powers is the principle that all power is distributed among the three branches. The Constitution divides power among the legislative, executive and judicial branches. The Congress makes the laws, the executive enforces and administers the laws, and the judicial interprets the laws. Separation of power keeps a strong central government from being too strong. Too much power concentrated in any one branch could lead to abuse of that power.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    7. Separation of Powers- the principle or system of keeping the government broken up into different branches; the executive, legislative, and judicial powers of government…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second guard against tyranny was separation of powers which means the power is separated into three branches. This is done so one person or branch of government cannot become too powerful. These branches of power are separate and distinct. For example, the legislative branch consists of the senate and House of Representatives, the executive branch consists of the President, and the judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court. (Document B) Separation of powers protects against tyranny.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Separation of powers is known as the division of power among legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. Back to 1748, Montesquieu, a French political theorist proposed dividing political authority into legislative, executive, and judicial powers. He believed that assigning each set of powers to a separate branch of government would promote liberty. Like Montesquieu, the Founders of the US also thought that promoted Liberty would help the US to develop better. Therefore, they decided to use the Separation of powers system. In the US, the Separation of powers works under "checks and balances" system, whereby each branch of government exercises some control over the others. In Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, the Founders stated that "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in the Congress of the US. In Section 8 of this Article, they also gave the Congress expressed powers which included enumerated and delegated powers, and implied power which is also called "elastic clause". This clause gives Congress the right to make all laws "necessary and…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    SEPARATION OF POWERS

    • 2870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The doctrine of Separation of Powers deals with the mutual relations among the three organs of the Government namely legislature, executive and judiciary. The origin of this principle goes back to the period of Plato and Aristotle. It was Aristotle who for the first time classified the functions of the Government into three categories viz., deliberative, magisterial and judicial. Locks categorized the powers of the Government into three parts namely: continuous executive power, discontinuous legislative power and federative power. “Continuous executive power” implies the executive and the judicial power, “discontinuous legislative power” implies the rule making power, federative power‟ signifies the power regulating the foreign affairs. The French Jurist Montesquieu in his book Spirit of Laws published in 1748, for the first time enunciated the principle of separation of powers. That’s why he is known as modern exponent of this theory. Montesquieu`s doctrine, in essence, signifies the fact that one person or body of persons should not exercise all the three powers of the Government viz. legislative, executive and judiciary.…

    • 2870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The separation of powers is a theory of government whereby political power is distributed among three branches of government- the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The three branches act both independently and interdependently. This theory has been criticised for a number of reasons.…

    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early Religious Wars

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Chapter 7: Separation of Powers (1997). Retrieved July 30, 2009, from SocIndex with Full text Database. (University Library).…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of powers, hence, refers to the division of government accountabilities into discrete branches to limit any one branch from exercising the primary functions of another. The intent is to avoid the attentiveness of power and offer for checks and balances.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Separation of Powers is very important; it creates unique roles for each branch of government. There are three different branches, there’s the legislative branch, the judicial branch, and the executive branch. In the legislative branch, the laws are created, budgets are passed, and wars are declared. The judicial branch determines which laws apply to specific cases, reviews constitutionally of laws, and determines interpretations of laws. The executive branch enforces, or vetoes the laws that the legislative branch creates, declares state of emergency, and appoints federal judges, cabinet advisers, and others at the approval of the Senate. The purpose of the Separation of Powers is to ensure that no one party or belief can have more control over the government than another.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays