Preview

Sheila Mason and Craig Shepherd

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sheila Mason and Craig Shepherd
1. What are the most important issues confronting Sheila Mason? Explain you priority of important issues. The most important issue confronting Sheila is that her previous company, ATS, is claiming she may be in violation of her Employee Noncompetition, Nonsolicitation, Nondisclosure and Development Agreement that she signed when she was hired by the company. The day after she quit she began officially working for her own company, which ATS indicates is in direct competition with its own business. Her agreement with her former employer indicates that she cannot be involved directly or indirectly with another company for a period of one year after leaving ATS that is in competition with ATS. Mason also has another issue with the agreement she signed which states that she cannot, for one year from her termination date of her ATS employment, solicit or do business with any customer of the Company or any potential customer of the Company. So, her first hurdle is going to be to prove that her new business is in no way in competition with ATS. If she succeeds at this, she will then have to ensure that does not speak with any customers that ATS currently holds. This will significantly limit her market for initial sales of the product. Another issue confronting Mason is that she frequently uses her personal laptop for business travel and as such, she syncs her work data with her personal data. ATS, her former company, is now claiming ownership of this data and requesting that she turn it back over to the company. Within this collection of data there is likely revealing information relating to her new venture. This could give ATS all the proof they need in order to charge her with the violation of the agreement she signed with the company. This issue should be her least priority at the moment because if she is careful, she can ensure that no information relating to her new venture is ever transferred to ATS.

2. What are the most important issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Janet has signed a contract with BUGusa she is committing intentional tort because she is intentionally leaving one company knowing that she has an agreement. She is intentionally leaving them to go work for the competitor so that she can get more money. She can be held liable for any harm or money loss for BUGusa because she has left the department with a signed contract.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SS5004 Assignment 2

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page

    b) Identify between two and three leadership challenges and discuss what approaches Lisa can adopt to overcome them? 60%…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUGusa

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because Janet resigned and accepted the offer of WIRETIME, Inc. she committed a tort. A non-compete clause is a serious contract that can lead to severe punishment and fines. No matter if Janet was fired or if she quit, if she works for a competitor within the 2-year non-compete clause contract, illegal action has been committed and she will be punished one way or the other. If she would of resigned, and then waited 2 years to employee with WIRETIME, Inc. then no tort would have been committed.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ms. Granbury can claim illegal discharge through citing breach of an implied contract. The handbook lists a number of grounds on which an employees’ employment may be terminated. It…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB U05

    • 464 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nikita, an employee-agent of Operational Processes, Inc., is authorized to access company trade secrets. Nikita downloads those secrets onto a thumb drive. She then quits Operational’s employ and goes to work for Quantum Analysis, Inc., an Operational competitor, with whom she shares the secrets. With respect to the agent’s duty of loyalty to her principal, this is…

    • 464 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In case of termination, the former employee will not allowed to conduct business of the same as BLANK, Inc. within 100-mile…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case I have chosen is Meras Engineering, INC., et al. (Plaintiffs) V. CH20, INC., et al., (Defendants). Meras Engineering is a provider of water treatment solutions. They develop products that treat industrial and agricultural water applications. CH20 is a similar company that provides clients with chemicals that control the biological fouling in cooling towers. Rich Beriner and Jay Sughroue were employed by CH20 and signed a non-compete agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O, INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years”…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law I Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The plaintiff claimed that the now former employees were in violation of their contract and has caused his business hardship, therefore they should be terminated and not allowed to work in competition with his company.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * That means, you cannot work with another company of the same business as The Alexis Group.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    National Cranberry

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What are the most critical problems facing National Cranberry that Mr. Schaeffer must address? What are some potential causes of these problems? What potential solutions do you suggest?…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mary Davis needs to debate on what she needs, what is morally right, and what her next action will be. If she needs to pay her bills then it does not matter as to what is morally right or wrong. She would need to focus on keeping her job and act as if she never wrote her article. If she is not desperate to keep her job she should do what is morally right to her which could be sticking to what she believes in. Going into her company and addressing that she was a very hard and consistent worker for them, but she will be leaving due to the situation. She could go to court ad fight that her ultimatum is unjust. She is obligated to be on the side of the company she works for or to pick her own side. She has to choose whether to keep her job or not.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Memo

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Angela Woodside visited our firm on December 18th 2007 and played out her scenario for us so that we can help her resolve this dilemma she has been caught up in. After her meeting, you’ve requested that I address the following six (6) issues with my opinion. Please take a moment to review my research.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Process Paper

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (n.d.). U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Retrieved March 4, 2009, from http://eeoc.gov/index.html…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I HAD TO UPLOAD A DOCUMENT SO I UPLOADED A DOCUMENT. SORRY GUYS. I MEAN IT. I'M NOT PROMOTING ANYTHING,I JUST NEEDED AN ESSAY URGENTLY AND I HAD TO MAKE AN ACCOUNT. THANKS FOR UNDERSTANDING,HAVE A NICE DAY!…

    • 5229 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Analysis

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case presents a very typical situation that people encounter while working in the corporate environment. What is ethical, what is morally correct and what is just right out against the law are the questions that we all face while working in a corporate environment. Some of the ethical questions are governed by the law facing the situation. For example while working in an investment bank you most probably have access to inside information about upcoming deals that one could possibly use for personal monetary gain or you could act as a tippie and possibly share that confidential information with others. This kind of a situation is definilety governed by the law and you can actually be charged with various insider trading laws and possibly do some jail time as well. The other situation that is presented in the case is purely about ones ethical and moral standards. The analyst either has to compromise her loyalty towards her company B&B or towards her best friend Lori. While the situation presented is not a real zero-sum game, i.e., one player’s loss does not equal to the gain of the other player. When faced in a situation like this one has to think about what decisions can be made that will have the least affect on the players involved. The analyst should not look at the situation she faces as black or white. She should rather think about other options she might have to retain her friend’s loyalty while not compromising her loyalty towards her current employer. For example, Lori has already been laid off by her current employer, Universal group. The Universal group has already broken certain ethical and moral laws by not informing about the situation to B&B. So can the analyst come up with a situation where she can get Lori immediately and legally hired at B&B and convince her to share the information with B&B. In essence Lori will not have to feel guilty about not keeping the information confidential as has been laid off and the…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays