Flavia Guberaj
24/01/2014
Should animals be used for different researches or testing products?
In different places of the world a lot of researches and product’s tests proceed by using animals. And for decades the debate of “should animals be used for these experiments?” has been inevitable. F. Barbara Orlans, in her book called “In The Name Of Science: Issues In Responsible Animal Experimentation”, says that the biomedical researches and testing the product’s safety are the experiments in which sixty percent of animals are being used. Maybe not all the people in the world see animals as me or as other humans that think like me. Not all the people see animals as species like us, with their own rights. There are a lot of people that see an animal as a “thing” that is been born for researches and for testing products for our safety. Another reason that animals should not bee used for these experiments is because not always the tests that are proceed in animal’s body have a successful end. So the suffer or the death of animals is not worth any profit to human. And the third reason is that they can use other ways to do these researches or tests, without the need of animals. Therefore people should stop using animals for their researches or for testing their new products.
First, we have no right to abuse with animal’s rights. I want to start with the words of Tom Regan, a professor that gives philosophy’s lessons at North Carolina State University, that are: “Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment…This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment.” (qtd. In Orlans 26). Animals are creatures of GOD just like people and we can not just put them on a table and do experiments to them. If we act like this than we are violate them and we don’t let them the right to choose if they want to be part of these ore not. Experiments like product’s testing are sometimes a painful and torturing procedures for the animals. Maybe animals can not talk to say what is right for them and to make a choice, but this does not mean that we, people, have the right to make such painful decisions like these. Yes, if we have an animal in our house we make decisions by caring them but not by torturing them. “Risks are not morally transferable to those who do not choose to take them.” (qtd. In Orlans 26). We make decisions for animals because we know that they don’t have the ability to talk in our “human” language to make their own decisions by themselves. When human decide to use animals for researches or product’s testing they decide by not thinking of the wellbeing of animals but their own interest and benefits. So, we have to stop these experiments cause violates the rights of these unprotected creatures.
Second, the suffer and death of animals in these experiments are not worth any profit to people. “The American Veterinary Medial Association defines animal pain unpleasant sensory and emotional experience perceived as arising from the specific region of the body and associated with actual or potential tisse damage.”(Orlans 129). If someone take and torture us with different laboratory substances we will feel pain. The same thing happens with animals that are used for tests or laboratory researches. Animals have feelings like us and they feel pain too cause their body is a normal body with blood, heart, and meat. In testing toxicity procedures there are two kinds of tests: Draize and LD50. These two kinds of tests are painful and sometimes cause death of most of the animal used. The Draize test is a procedure in which the substance goes into the animal(rabbit in this test) eyes. This substance cause blindness and is really brutal for the animal. In the LD50 test they use a substance that goes with a tube in the stomach of animals and the dosage of this substance causes death. It is a painful death cause it lasts for days until an animal die. Michael Balls, in his article “Time to Reform Toxic Tests” calls the LD50 test “scientifically unjustifiable. The precision purports to provide is an illusion because of uncontrollable biological variables.”(31). The number of the Draize and LD50 tests proceeded is lower now-days but anyway these toxicity tests should be eliminated cause the suffer, the pain, and the death of animals is a waste of lives and time too.
Third, why make animals suffer when there are a many other ways that can be useful without the need of animals? The Body Shop, a cosmetic institution in London, has published a brochure named In Against Animal Testing in which it says that they “use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as other with a long of safe human usage” rather than using animals. Instead of doing tests for the safety of human skin from some substances on animal’s skin they can do them on artificial skin. Another example of products that can be useful for researches is the Eyetex. This product is just the same like the real eyes of humans and it turns muddy when any substance cause damage. By using this synthetic product researchers can find answers for different substances that may be dangerous for people’s eyes. You can even use computers that now-days they are becoming useful for all the issues of life like: medicine, finance, cosmetics etc… Using animals in brutal ways in these researches instead of using objects that are not creatures is needless.
Anyhow, some people think that animals are inferior so they are born to suffer and being used in experiments. Maybe animals have not the ability to speak or to choose but they have a heart,a brain and a body so they have the right to live their own life in peace without any torturing processes. Why we have to think about our own interest without asking what we are doing to these scared and “inferior”(as people call them) creatures? In an article “Is Your Experiment Really Necessary?” Sheila Silock says: “Animals may themselves be the beneficiaries of animal experiments. But the value that we place on the quality of their lives is determined by their perceived to humans.”(34). By thinking on our well being we are not justified as how we cruelly treat the poor animals. Humans should fix their worth by the way they treat other creatures of Mother Earth too. “Animals are subjects of life just like human beings are, and a subject of life has inherent value. They are…ends in themselves.”(qtd. In Orlans 26). So we are equal to animals and they have inherent value like us. We don’t have the right to abuse with them and to discriminate their lives just cause they are not “people”. People does not mean GOD!
I can not justify the way that people treat animals for their interests. I do not find any strong or reasonable reason to torture animals just like they were toys without feelings, without heart, and without soul. They have the right to choose but they can not cause they do not have the ability to talk and to say what is wrong. Even if they are not “human” they have the right to have a peaceful life and to live without pains caused by equal creatures like them, by us! Why choosing to do experiments by making them suffer or even worst, die, when there are many other ways without the need of animals? We are not GOD to choose to punish them with pain or death. By treating them badly we show that we do not have any value as creatures of Mother Earth. We have to put ourselves in their place and just for a second we could imagine how it should be to take you in a laboratory and putting you substances that may cause you pain, suffer and even die. If being a human with great values means to be cruel with animals and to treat them like simple objects then I call myself a really bad person without values. If being humanistic means to be selfish against animals rights then I am a cruel person. But I know one thing that doing like superior and playing GOD’s role does not make your life better or does not make you GOD so STOP violate other living creatures and be realistic that you are just one of all the “creatures” in earth and live your life without destroying others life(including animals). People always try to find peace in their lives but I want to conclude with a phrase of a great person and maybe all these people will find the answer of this peace that they want so much:“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” (cit. Ghandi).
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions…
- 552 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…
- 1042 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of this text is to give a little insight as to why animal testing is important and what the companies doing this testing go through with animal activist groups. With the animal testing, possible cure for AIDS, other deadly diseases, and maybe cancer lie upon these creatures. The authors try to explain that the animal activist groups are trying their best to keep this from happening.…
- 1396 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
'Animals can be used in medical research, because humans are more important than animals.' Discuss.…
- 823 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
`”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…
- 1351 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
This paper will discuss animal testing for medical purposes. It will begin by defining the process of animal testing and go through some of its history. It will discuss whether the testing of animals for medical purposes is just or unjust and evaluate which types of testing are ethically acceptable and which are not from a Utilitarian and Kantian viewpoint. It will conclude with evaluations of the different standpoints and state why I believe it is just and ethically acceptable to use animals for medical research.…
- 2751 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Animals are usually confined to small cages and being exposed to harmful fumes for human benefit.In their “Animal” Journal, Elisabeth H. Ormandy and Catherine Schuppli claim that "the use of animals in research fosters a diverse range of attitudes, with some people expressing the desire for complete abolition of animal research practices, while others express strong support (392)." Animal testing has stirred up an argument between two opposing sides regarding the ethics of the practice. The two opposing sides are those who disagree with animal testing and those who agree with animal testing. Nuno Henrique Franco author of "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective" state that "Animal experimentation has played a central role in biomedical research throughout history. For centuries, however, it has also been an issue of heated public and philosophical discussion."(238) Those who are in favor of animal testing believe that it is beneficial to improving medicine. Those who are against animal testing believe that it is harmful to animals and that their are other ways to benefit humans. Being an animal lover, I oppose of animal testing for several different reasons. The first reason being animals are being subjected to all forms of suffering and isolation. The second reason is animals are not…
- 1778 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Animal Experimentation by Peggy J. Parks describes advantages and disadvantages of animal research. This book explains one of the major social justice issue that is becoming controversial these days: Animal Rights. Scientists are trying to find new vaccines and medical products, but you cannot test them on humans right away. We cannot risk human’s life, but can we risk animal’s life? In 2005, the USDA reported that 1,177,566 animals were used in the laboratory, excluding mice, rats, birds, fish, etc. The scientists mostly failed to make new discovery, and even if they did, it was not effective because humans and animals are very different. Animals are also used in education, but some students and parents consider dissection of animals as teaching…
- 509 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In time, animals have been stripped of their rights and used to benefit human life through the process of animal experimentation or, animal testing. Around 20 million animals are subjected to this type of research annually in the United States alone (Gershoff 98). This specific…
- 2246 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Animal testing is a practice that helps new discoveries in the fields of science and health sciences. However, it has been laid on top of a hidden, dark torture chamber. The reckless torture of animals involved is abysmal. The theme of the essay is to point out that animals and humans share the same fate during torture and humans should start treating animals with the respect they deserve and give them the freedom they are destined to enjoy. Even though animal testing has so many advantages, this horror defeats all the pros.…
- 672 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal testing is used as a method to assess the safety and effectiveness of many products and chemicals (Bishop). Many people deem this acceptable and don’t think twice about the countless animals being tortured. It can be argued that animal experimentation can be valuable and have helped find cures for many diseases. However, the numbers of successes are minimal. Testing on animals is brutal and unnecessary, and should be prohibited in all countries.…
- 727 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The practice of animal experimentation has increased tremendously over the globe. Animal research is immoral because animals are being subjected to not being properly advocated for, are experiencing detrimental testing and there are alternative methods other than crucial animal experiments. Animal testing is defined as a scientific experiment to where a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them “fear, discomfort, pain or distress” (Fisher). Animal experiments include injecting them with harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation, removing organs, forcing them to inhale toxic gases, and other horrifying procedures. Although through animal testing some diseases have been cured, there…
- 927 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Almost every major medical achievement has relied on animal testing at some stage in the process” (O’Neill 1). Scientist conclude that animal testing allows the creation of new drugs. Animal testing is cheap for them. And there is a large supply of animals for medical research. Animals are easily bred, and can easily be maintained stable in controlled laboratories. Some diseases and health problems can only be studied in living organisms. People believe that if animal testing was not conducted most of our products would not be around. People rely so much on animal testing. They believe that animal testing can save their lives, and that without it we do not know if a product is safe or not. Scientist have come down to the conclusion that animals and human body structure are very similar. Animals are biologically similar to humans in many ways. Animals are easy for scientist to study due to the fact that they have short life-cycles. Their whole life-span can be studied very easily in a controlled environment. Scientists need to follow the three Rs before practicing any kind of experimentation in an animal. The tree Rs…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Animals are unique creatures placed all around the world, each with their own genuine, exotic, and weird personalities. Unfortunately, every year, “scientists” use them to test potentially dangerous products that most people use in our everyday lives. Although scientists claim that there is no other way to test them, and that their work ethics are a necessity to keep the society safe, they are wrong. There are many other ways to test animals without harming them, and “scientists” should be using those ways with no problem. Animal testing is inhumane, cruel and unethical, and there are other, non-harmful ways to test.…
- 732 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays