Preview

Should College Athletes Be Paid

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should College Athletes Be Paid
College Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid While catching up on some game day scores for college football, an article popped up on the side with a title reading, College Athletes Deserve To Be Paid. I noticed it was written by Michael Wilbon, one of the hosts from the ESPN show, Pardon the Interruption. Already disagreeing with the title before even reading it, I was skeptical, but I clicked on the link and started to read. Wilbon brought up a number of decent points throughout the article, but for some odd reason, they didn’t seem to add up to me. This is why I took the opportunity to do a little more research behind the points made in the article and came up with a concept of my own. Wilbon’s reasons why to pay the athletes don’t have a strong backbone to them and his ideas on how to pay athletes are simply not feasible. A point made by Wilbon is that the poor athletes have no spending money, which accounts for a large percent of college programs. This is a false accusation. Although not every student athlete receives grants, the NCAA will provide the low income athletes and their families a Pell Grant worth $5,500 per year that can be spent on anything. For this year, The NCAA gave out over $31 million in Pell Grants. Since the NCAA has originated, they have been helping out colleges with supporting the financial needs of athletes that are not met through the school. Wilbon also believes that the only collegiate athletes that should be paid are the ones that are on revenue producing teams. In most cases this would be the football teams and men’s basketball teams. While this may not seem fair to the other teams, Wilbon’s reason is simple; Capitalism. The only players that deserve to be paid are the ones that can make the NCAA money. This could cause problems within the United States court systems however. Even if you wanted to pay the revenue-producing athletes, Titles VII and IX could withhold the process. Title VII prohibits employment


Cited: Bennett, Dashiell. "Only 22 Of 120 Division I Athletic Programs Made Money Last Year." Business Insider. N.p., 15 June 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. . "Distribution of the Money." NCAA Champion, n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. . "National Collegiate Athletic Association." Where Does the Money Go? N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. . Schlabach, Mark. "NCAA: Where Does the Money go?" ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. . Wilbon, Michael. "College Athletes Deserve to Be paid." ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, 18 July 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With the amount of money coming in as revenue for the colleges, the expenses are relatively minimal in comparison, and these expenses mostly include costs for colleges to either host or run a specific sporting event. The money that is left after expenses have been taken out is then reinstated to the colleges: “Each year, about 60 percent of all NCAA revenue is returned directly to the Division I conferences and member institutions. For the 2010-11 fiscal year, that figure was $478 million (61 percent)” (NCAA, Distributions). This does not seem right on many levels. The member institutions are receiving 60 percent of the money and retaining it for use throughout the college. There needs to be a change in policy for college athletics at a state level to distribute this money throughout the people who actually made it; the athletes.…

    • 6054 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    College football and basketball athletics at most NCAA division one schools are big business industry. In most division one school, college Football revenues can gross up to 90 million dollars in revenue, and college basketball revenues can be as high as 48.8 million dollars. For last year’s Bowl Championship Series (BCS) champion, the University of Alabama has brought in over 82 million dollars in revenue. That was fifth highest gross in college football in 2012 football season. The University spends about 31.9 million dollars on their team expenses, allowing the University to profit about 45.1 million dollars. Who gets this left over millions? It is surely is not the college athletics. According to an article by Gregg Doyel (2013), the National College Players Association, the average college football player owes more than $3,000 from their own pocket pre a year. If you times that by four plus the four years…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article states that the NCAA makes an annual total of six billion dollars a year yet the NCAA decides not to pay the student athletes anything but a scholarship. The author uses his logos skills to show how much the NCAA has started to pay the student athletes to travel and face other universities from around the country. Gary Phillips says that the NCAA pays the student athletes around a total of 2,600 dollars. This has not went throughout the whole NCAA but Seton Hall University has made a deal to pay for the students travel and needs, and a little extra spending money. With all the stats and numbers that are shown throughout the article Gary Phillips uses his logos skills to bring us as an audience into what the student athletes are having to deal with, money…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The biggest question circulating in college sports right now is the controversial topic that ask, “Should college athletes be paid?” In August, a federal judge decided that players in top college football and men’s basketball programs- the big-money sports- are entitled to receive payment if their “names, images, and likenesses” are used in video games or TV broadcasts, according to Veronica Majerol, author of the article “Should College Athletes Be Paid”. It is a subject that has been around for a long period of time, and is now receiving light on the matter. The problem with this is where would the funds come from? Also, paying athletes would take away the fact that they play for the love of the…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On average, annually D1 Colleges are earning 50 million dollars across all sports in the schools. All of the D1 schools are making a great deal of money off these stellar athletes and they are receiving very minimal in return. On the other hand, if D1 colleges decide to pay their athletes how could this affect the other programs in the school? This is where the discourse begins on whether we should pay the college athletes, or is a scholarship more than content for the student. As a result of this dispute it can cause humongous outrages from angry parents and fans of certain teams.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the article Jalen Rose describes reasons why the college players should be paid to play. This isn’t the first time that this has come up before, but it seems to have more steam every time it comes up in a conversation. There’s always going to have someone like Cam Newton that receives money improperly. Each college athlete should be paid a stipend of $2000.00 per semester. All the college athletes’ coaches and the schools they go to, but they are the ones that get the money and the athletes don’t get any of the money. They treat these college athletes like servants. They can’t have even a part-time…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2."Some College Athletes Will Now Get Paid—a Little." <i>Http://time.com/3089288/ncaa-college-athletes-pay/</i>. Web.3."N.C.A.A. Must Allow Colleges to Pay Athletes, Judge Rules." <i>Http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/09/sports/federal-judge-rules-against-ncaa-in-obannon-case.html?_r=0</i>. Web.4."The College-athlete Pay Case That Nearly Didn 't Happen." <i>Http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/30/us/ncaa-pay/</i>. Web.5."NCAA Athletes Not Entitled to Compensation." <i>Http://www.redandblack.com/views/ncaa-athletes-not-entitled-to-compensation/article_6ca1c4cc-5935-11e4-a187-001a4bcf6878.html</i>.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NCAA Cost Deficit Analysis

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Universities and NCAA Division I athletic programs are closely connected in many ways. One of the main ways these two are connected is based on finances. There are several financial positions that are established. While all points display problems with the finances, these perspectives are different problems. One perspective is that financial spending is usually not self-sustainable with rising costs, showing a need to use as many resources as possible to keep the programs alive. Some think that the limit of resources should be better distributed to academic spending. Some think that there are resources that are available for students to be paid as employees. My position is that some spending should be cut away from athletics, as it is proven…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his ESPN article “College Athletes Deserve to Be Paid,” Michael Wilbon begins by saying that he used to 100% against the idea that college athletes should be paid, but has recently reconsidered his former belief. He now agrees that college athletes should be paid, but not all of them. He feels that the only male student-athletes that should receive some type of benefits are the ones that actually generate significant revenue for their school and the NCAA. He explains that all other sports besides basketball and football aren’t in the equation. Wilbon…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NCAA is in charge of several sports from basketball and football to wrestling and golf. The NCAA is in charge of three various divisions, which are based on the size and success of the school. With this issue, many sports analysts have started to make their very own statements on it. Michael Wilbon is a sports analyst for ESPN, when debating about whether college athletes should be paid or not, Wilbon wrote in an article, “The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. … Yet, no player can benefit from that work. The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students -- employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law” (Wilbon). People need to understand the great amount of unfairness that college athletes have been enduring. The NCAA is making millions of dollars off of these college athletes, and these college athletes are simply not receiving one penny of it. The NCAA is not treating their college athletes right in the slightest bit, but could arguably be violating the law, as well. Therefore, college athletes should be paid because of their diligent efforts for the…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a star of a college basketball team. They take their team to the championship game and win the game. Their jerseys are selling like crazy and their school is bringing in millions of dollars off of their work. In any other situation they would be a millionaire with a fancy house and car. But not if they are a college athlete because they don't get paid. Even though their school made a lot of money off their blood, sweat, and tears they still don't get paid one penny. There is no doubt that college athletes should be paid. They should be paid because they work hard and put their bodies on the line, they would make college sports more competitive, and they also bring in hundreds of millions of dollars.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Athletic departments in colleges nationwide generate massive revenue and depend on the success of their athletes for income. For example, the Southeastern Conference became the first conference in 2010 to earn over $1 billion in athletic receipts, Taylor Branch wrote in The Atlantic last year. The Big Ten was a close second with earnings close to $905 million, he wrote” (Rebecca Barry n.p.). Opposers of paying college athletes always seem to complain “Athletes are already on scholarships, they don’t need to get paid “when in fact scholarships exceeding $20,000 may seem like a lot but in reality it only covers tuition, housing, a meal plan, and textbooks (Tyson Hartnett n.p.). No matter what type of scholarship college athletes are normally dead broke. But top NCAA executives make 1 million dollars a year; coaches on average make $100,000 a year plus bonuses for wins, records, etc. (Tyson Hartnett n.p.). Opposers also say “It is unfair to students who are paying tuition and don’t get paid to go there, for athletes to get scholarships and to get paid to go there”(Anna Simmons n.p.). When in fact the non-athletes are not bringing in money to the school like the athletes are. Universities bring in millions of dollars every year with their athletic programs through donations, ticket sales, media rights, advertising, ect. Colleges make all this money, yet most of it is not used for the benefit of the college athletes (21 Reasons…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    paying college athletes

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    College athletes are called amateurs, but are they really? Some of these kids are making millions of dollars, not for themselves but for their universities and coaches. Many college players are referred to as “student athletes”, with teachers and coaches constantly putting an emphasis on the “student” part; although many student athletes identify with the latter. When their participating in their sport or doing their school work how are they supposed to have the normal college experience?How are they going to afford food and other items college students need? The question of whether or not student athletes around the country should be paid or not has been lingering around college sports as long as college sports itself. College athletes around the country have been making millions of millions of dollars for their alma maters, however, they aren't getting a penny for their performance. This may be an argument for why student athletes should actually be paid. This topic has gotten huge attention, and the highest authorities of the NCAA have acknowledged it. With the momentum this topic has achieved, there are many questions that must be asked: Who would pay them? How do you pay them? How much do you pay them? There are so many questions that schools and the NCAA board need to ask. Although there are many unknowns circling this issue, one thing is for sure – student athletes deserve to get a piece of the pie they helped baked.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the modern college sports era, the call for student-athletes to be paid has escalated. These athletes are now apart of a nearly billion-dollar industry in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).…

    • 2143 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a membership organization of colleges and universities whose fundamental charge is to “maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the educational program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body” (NCAA 2014). This debate of whether college athletes should receive compensation is not that of new origin (Ts). This has been a topic of discussion since the inception of the NCAA. According to Anthony Miller, author of NCAA Division I Athletics: Amateurism and Exploitation, when it comes to debating whether or not college athletes should be paid, the two most…

    • 2037 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays