Should Flag Burning Be Illegal Essay
The most disrespectful action to do against is burn the flag, the symbol of the country meant for certain freedoms that the people need and want. Even though it’s a debatable topic for the people in America for burning the flag a person is sent to jail or not. But burning the flag is highly disrespectful towards the military also to our country and what it stands for. The flag is the symbol of our country and it stands for the freedoms in the United States of America, so for someone to burn the flag should be put to jail. Unfortunately this is kind of protected by the first amendment for freedom of speech. Flag burning is not a sign of speech its more of an action than anything. Even though this action can be used in protest but people could still be arrested. Burning the flag is speech it is a
…show more content…
disrespectful action towards the United States, to the military, and it is not fully represented by the first amendment..
Flag burning is full on disrespectful to our country.
Burning the flag of the United States is burning the peoples freedoms because that what the flag represents.It is the symbol of this country and the whole world recognizes the flag and people that live in the country decide to burn the flag. In the article "Burn the Flag or Burn the Constitution" by Fulton Sandra, she states, "Those who would burn the flag destroy the symbol of freedom, but amending the constitution would destroy part of freedom its self." Also, in "Flag Burning Should be Banned" by Brady Patrick and it stated, "They say the flag symbolizes the freedom to burn it: That our flag is the symbol of un-patriotic conduct. That burning the symbol of patriotism is patriotic." What this two articles are saying that is that burning the flag changes the look of the flag of this country, more times the flag is burned it shows the peoples freedoms burning at the same time. Plus, those who burn the flag try to separate freedom from patriotism but the flag already represents both of the statements. The flag of the United States is there to show our freedoms, patriotism, and people and we decide to burn
it. Even though we have freedoms protected by the fist amendment and flag burning is not fully protected by it. The first amendment is towards religion, speech, and infringing of the press, and flag burning and not on there because it is mostly an action so it can not be protected by freedom of speech. "Burning the flag or Burn the Constitution" says, "The First Amendment was written to protect the voices, views, beliefs, and expressions..."So flag burning does not fall into any of those categories because it is an action and actions does not fall in to the First Amendment. In the case of "U.S. vs O'Brien" it is simply stated, "It is short not simply the verbal or nonverbal nature to the expression, but the government interest at, that helps to determine whether a restriction on that expression is valid."This statement from the case explains only certain expressions with or without speech can be protected by the first amendment but burning the flag can not since it is invalid. Some protest contain the American flag but burring it does cause some consequences between the people like controversies.
Congress also has a problem with desecrating the flag because in the amendment it tries to protect the flag in cases of it being burned. In one case of O'Brien it was stated, "Application to him is unconstitutional as enacted because what he calls "purpose" of congress was to suppress freedom of speech." So his action towards the court was an unconstitutional expression. Basically it goes against congress and the first amendment. Our founding fathers did not want the people to burn the symbol of the country. The article "Flag burning Should Be Banned" by Brady Patrick it clearly states, "Remind them that it damages nothing because it changes nothing: it simply restores the Constitution to its original meaning, the meaning of the founders." /Burning the flag basically does nothing in all but it still does not mean it acceptable. So why burn the flag in the in the first place? Flag burning is disrespectful and doesn’t have a meaning towards in doing it. All it does is "piss" off the people in America who are proud to be in the country. Doing this action is hateful in protest and it could not be protected by the first amendment.
disrespectful action towards the United States, to the military, and it is not fully represented by the first amendment..
Flag burning is full on disrespectful to our country.
Burning the flag of the United States is burning the peoples freedoms because that what the flag represents.It is the symbol of this country and the whole world recognizes the flag and people that live in the country decide to burn the flag. In the article "Burn the Flag or Burn the Constitution" by Fulton Sandra, she states, "Those who would burn the flag destroy the symbol of freedom, but amending the constitution would destroy part of freedom its self." Also, in "Flag Burning Should be Banned" by Brady Patrick and it stated, "They say the flag symbolizes the freedom to burn it: That our flag is the symbol of un-patriotic conduct. That burning the symbol of patriotism is patriotic." What this two articles are saying that is that burning the flag changes the look of the flag of this country, more times the flag is burned it shows the peoples freedoms burning at the same time. Plus, those who burn the flag try to separate freedom from patriotism but the flag already represents both of the statements. The flag of the United States is there to show our freedoms, patriotism, and people and we decide to burn
it. Even though we have freedoms protected by the fist amendment and flag burning is not fully protected by it. The first amendment is towards religion, speech, and infringing of the press, and flag burning and not on there because it is mostly an action so it can not be protected by freedom of speech. "Burning the flag or Burn the Constitution" says, "The First Amendment was written to protect the voices, views, beliefs, and expressions..."So flag burning does not fall into any of those categories because it is an action and actions does not fall in to the First Amendment. In the case of "U.S. vs O'Brien" it is simply stated, "It is short not simply the verbal or nonverbal nature to the expression, but the government interest at, that helps to determine whether a restriction on that expression is valid."This statement from the case explains only certain expressions with or without speech can be protected by the first amendment but burning the flag can not since it is invalid. Some protest contain the American flag but burring it does cause some consequences between the people like controversies.
Congress also has a problem with desecrating the flag because in the amendment it tries to protect the flag in cases of it being burned. In one case of O'Brien it was stated, "Application to him is unconstitutional as enacted because what he calls "purpose" of congress was to suppress freedom of speech." So his action towards the court was an unconstitutional expression. Basically it goes against congress and the first amendment. Our founding fathers did not want the people to burn the symbol of the country. The article "Flag burning Should Be Banned" by Brady Patrick it clearly states, "Remind them that it damages nothing because it changes nothing: it simply restores the Constitution to its original meaning, the meaning of the founders." /Burning the flag basically does nothing in all but it still does not mean it acceptable. So why burn the flag in the in the first place? Flag burning is disrespectful and doesn’t have a meaning towards in doing it. All it does is "piss" off the people in America who are proud to be in the country. Doing this action is hateful in protest and it could not be protected by the first amendment.