Preview

Should State And Federal Government Be Monitored?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should State And Federal Government Be Monitored?
"Whether we like it or not, the internet is a part of our everyday lives now. The web is used for everything from posting selfies and finding recipes to managing bank accounts and businesses. Since the internet has become so important in today's society, people have been debating whether or not it should be monitored. No one likes being watched, but what if that monitoring prevented a murder or a terrorist attack? I believe that the state and federal government should be able to monitor the internet because it is a public place where people should have nothing to hide, the constitution has no provisions protecting internet privacy, and because monitoring the web can prevent crimes before they happen.
When you post something on the internet, it is understood that anyone can see it and use it for or against you. People know that whatever they post could be seen by potential bosses, friends, and parents. Therefore, no one should be posting things that they wouldn't want their grandma to see, let alone things that could get the FBI sent after them. Anyone who is proficient at hacking can monitor the internet, so why shouldn't the government be able to? People who have nothing to hide should not worry about being monitored by the government since they are choosing to post things for the public to see.
…show more content…
The first amendment protects the privacy of beliefs, the fourth amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure, and the fifth amendment protects the privacy of personal information. All of these protections are made to keep the government from disturbing people's personal lives. However, things posted on the internet are not personal, they are public. The constitution allows for the monitoring of public areas, otherwise, how could laws be enforced? There is a delicate balance between freedom and peace and our government does a pretty good job of keeping that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin De La Rosa Thesis

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I am Justin D Delarosa, I'm a 6’3, Mexican American, with a little Native American. I enjoy being with friends and making jokes. Some may say that i'm not special, but I would like to say that I am. I'd like to say that i'm a natural cook. Since I began cooking in 2009, I would usually make good food, though I made a few mishaps, there would usually always be good meals and desserts. Such as; Mexican food, cakes, cookies, lasagna, and many other dishes.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This makes us more prone to hacker attacks, identity thefts, and privacy right violations. A person might enjoy getting information on websites, and increasing their security on privacy. The reality is that the NSA is the one creating the same software’s meant to protect our privacy. Therefore is it not easy for them to decode these same software’s meant to keep us safe. It is true that terrorists use websites and Tele-Communication to recruit and attack, but does that make it right for government agencies to abuse the Patriot Act, and the Fourth Amendment? Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, High-five, and other forms of social networks privacy terms are virtually non existent. “Facebook and other networks do agree that on their privacy terms to use your information for marketing and Intelligence gathering purposes” Erick Montero. This means that if a certain company wanted to find out how many people like its products, movies, shows or other things, Facebook would allow it to have access to it, for certain amount cash. So the next time you click I agree, make sure to deeply think about it. Our Fourth Amendment gives us the right to not accept unlawful search seizers and in an extent the right to privacy in a persons own car, home, or property. This Amendment is no longer in existence with the rise of police brutality, backed by the city the work for. “So long as you are seen as a threat, the fourth doesn’t apply to you” Erick…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English Paper Wiretapping

    • 2159 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thesis: Wiretapping enables both parties and government agencies to monitor the communications of targeted people to determine if they are doing something wrong. The Government should not have the luxury of imposing on the privacy of Americans without a reasonable doubt as to when they should get a warrant to be able to do so. The Government should not wiretap because it is an abuse of power, distrust, and ethical dilemma, the violation of the Fourth Amendment which involves the collecting and storing information about people who are not criminals to be penalized.…

    • 2159 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, technology has made countless advances skyrocketing towards the future. Thus the arguments about whether or not security is needed for this amount of power. There are many good aspects of the internet; including social media, messaging, games, and even dating. But, with these things, comes bad that we don't know much about; including catfishing, tracking, and also spying. With the click a button, everything done online can be seen by anyone.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2010, it became legal for the National Security Agency (NSA) to access private email logs, social media accounts and other internet databases (Risen & Poitras, "N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens). Risen and Poitras (2013) explain that the intention of this change was to help protect the United States (U.S.) from future terrorist attacks and was for the general purpose of national safety. It is unclear how many terrorist attacks all of this new intelligence has actually prevented, however, it is very clear that the NSA’s actions are violating the privacy of not only American citizens, but everyone who lives on American soil. With the internet as a resource, this means that they can not only listen in to conversations, but access virtually any data that is entered via the internet. This includes credit card numbers, GPS coordinates, flight destinations, contact information for family members, personal pictures and much more. The NSA not only violates the constitutional rights of American citizens, it puts everyone in the country at great personal risk for crimes such as fraud and discrimination.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think there should be limitations of what people can post without getting in trouble. When the government is looking for terrorists or other criminals by social media, they should be able to read things that are posted or sent if it suggests criminal activity. But they shouldn’t allow private businesses do it like Yahoo.com reading people’s Emails. It should be a government activity so there is a less chance of bias results. If the government can stop many bad things from happening just…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. A famous quote by none other than Benjamin Franklin, and although he did not live to see it, his words would be part of almost every argument considering internet surveillance. This ongoing debate is immense because many different people from all aspects of society use the internet, so everyone is affected by the outcome of the debate. There is no easy solution when it comes to the balance between security and freedom, but in the end the right thing to do is to allow people to not be monitored when surfing the internet as it is a violation of the constitution, very impractical, and morally wrong.…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world use social media sites. However, many do not realize that governments are able to use surveillance programs to spy on them. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, surveillance is the close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal and it can be defined as processes of information collection and processing. Surveillance on social media has its positives and negatives and people should know how to use it responsibly, critically and effectively. Surveillance programs endanger the privacy of each Internet user. The reason that surveillance is accepted is because it can help governments find terrorists and can help solve crimes. However, it is a concern for multiple people that there is no law or regulation on how governments are able to use the programs. Moreover, the surveillance programs are sold off the shelf to governments so…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have a quote from the National Security Agency, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.” Resolve: The benefits of domestic surveillance by the NSA outweigh the harms. From Oxford dictionary, I have a definition of privacy: freedom from unauthorized intrusion. The 4th Amendment from the constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." According to Cornell University Law School, the 4th amendment “prohibits generalized searches, unless extraordinary circumstances place the general public in danger.”…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, if a person gets on goggle and searches how to make a bomb, the government can react to that and see what they need a bomb for. Also, wiretapping monitors questionable people. Anybody that searches anything bad or that can harm someone else,, that person will be asked about whatever they searched. This will not affect your everyday life by any means. For example, if you search something that couldn’t harm someone elso you wouldn’t get a red…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kerr, Orin S. “Internet Surveillance Law After the USA Patriot Act: the Big Brother That…

    • 2726 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Surveillance in America is nothing new. It dates back to around 1945 with the ending of World War II after the Soviet Union and the United States became rivals as the world powers. From bugs on tree trunks to cameras in shoes to airplane drones, surveillance tools have really evolved over the years. The United States has been spending huge amounts of money to create better spying technology especially after terrorism increased over the last 20 years. The 9/11 terrorists attacks has greatly contributed to the increase of surveillance in America. A journalist states in his article, “‘you were fighting a never-ending war that gave you a…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA surveillance

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If a person has nothing to hide there should be no reason to have a problem with the NSA and the things that they do. I do see how people can feel like it is an invasion of privacy but at the end of the day, would you want the NSA to check on you every once in a while or would you rather risk the possibility of a terrorist attack that can lead into millions of lives lost ultimately leading to war? The NSA is able to tap into anyone’s email and texts but they aren’t doing it with malicious…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have a right to believe in what we want and say what we want without the government limiting it, but if the government monitors the content we post online, the First Amendment rights we have would be very much at risk of being violated. The first time the Supreme Court heard a case dealing with First Amendment protections and how they apply to the Internet was Elonis v. United States. According to the article The Supreme Court case that could kill online free speech — or curb online harassment, the case revolved around a Pennsylvania man, Anthony Elonis, who posted several violent comments on Facebook in 2010 stating that he wanted to kill his ex-wife for leaving him and taking their children with her. He was convicted and sentenced to 44 months in prison on four counts of “making threats.” Now, Elonis is before the Supreme Court arguing that his threats should not have been taken seriously, as they were just made online, and did not constitute “true threats”. This case really made people start to think whether government should have any power to determine what we can or can't say on the internet, because this can be an overstretch by the government on our First Amendment…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet Juliet is portrayed as an immature teenager. Although she shows signs of maturity, it is overshadowed by her childish behaviour. To begin, Juliet is impatient throughout the play. For example, when Nurse returned home and had news about Tybalt’s death Juliet kept pestering Nurse for information. The Nurse was attempting to speak, but whilst trying to explain that Tybalt was dead Juliet became irate, and impatient with the Nurse saying:…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays