Preview

Stop and Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stop and Frisk
In America there’s has been a lot of actions that the police have been used on citizens and innocent bystander. One of these actions are called “Stop and Frisk”, which has been used a lot these days, specially in New York. “ Stop and Frisk” means to be randomly search by police or a high authority when they suspect a bystander is carrying something suspicious. At times " Stop and Frisk” can be helpful at times , but not most of the time , and in some cases it has been believed to be used by high authorities to exploit the minorities. There has been many cases where random people have been stopped and been pressured by cops to get searched by force.
Specially here in New York , where there’s more 3rd class citizens than any other type. In New
York, most of the time there’s always an issue with racism or segregation, and because most cases, are about people that get stopped and search randomly for no reason. But in New York
“ Stop and Frisk” is a law that only works in this state. That is why some people don’t like this because they think that it gives high authorities , such as cops do anything they want , specially with people that live in rural places. Specially places like in the Bronx, Brooklyn, or Queens,
“ Stop and Frisk” happens a lot, do to the majority of type of people that live in theses boroughs.
That is why there’s many cases , where people get angry because high authorities don’t have any right to search someone without a particular reason. With this law a lot of people have questioned if there’s a way to stop, when in reality; it can’t be stopped because it’s the “law” and as a law, we citizens have to follow it. There have been many cases where citizens are angry for Police searching them randomly, due to their ethnicity or their characteristics. Stop and frisk is a serious matter just like Nicholas K. Peart talks about in his article “
Why is the N.Y.P.D After Me?” He was always cautioned by his mother to always

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How many times have you heard, read, or seen a story about a policeman abusing their power?…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Canada the two main tactics used by police officers everyday are, carding and investigative detention. Carding, also referred to as street checks is when an officer approaches pedestrians and asks for their identification. Investigative detention is if the police have reasonable grounds they have the right to detain people to investigate. In Morton's chapter he discusses the uprising issue the public has with these tactics. The key legal issues Morton talks about is how the tactics that the police use are possibly violating the charter rights. Morton describes two scenarios in which individuals were carded, in the first scenario a young female and older male were both stopped and carded in a shopping mall. The shopping mall that they were located in has previous…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will show how current “Stop and Frisk” (Terry Stop, SQF) methods exercised presently diverge greatly from the initial precedent allowed in Terry v. Ohio (1968) due to the inability to concretely define reasonable suspicion as well as the broad applications of reasonable suspicion since 1968. The most notable current representation involves The New York Police Department (NYPD) and its policy regarding Terry Stops as a proactive crime prevention and investigative tool (Ridgeway, 2006). Also considering the benefits shown in Ultimately, reasonable suspicion needs…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although improper interrogations are prohibited, they still take place. In the case “Central Park Jogger”, some kind of threat or physical…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry v. Ohio (1968) was a court case led by a conflict between a group of men and Officer McFadden. Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland, when he noticed a group of men suspiciously wandering around. He decided to observe them. After, he watched them for a period of time. Officer McFadden decided to approach them, and introduced himself and asked their identification. The officer grabbed Terry and began to pat him down, until he found a pistol. The group of men were arrested. The question addressed in this court case was whether “stop and frisk” is constitutional or not. The Supreme court decided it was constitutional, only when the police is to be committed if the suspect is not stopped, and frisk is considered constitutional when the police believe they suspect is armed or dangerous.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Summary

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One could also argue that the president of the U.S, Donald Trump, claimed that the use of stop and frisk reduced crime in NYC. However, what Johnson and Trump fail to realize is that the data they are referring to is all inaccurate because it was based on racial profiling. The use of stop and frisk proved that officers focus more on skin color rather than the behavior of an individual, proving that criminological data will mostly always be inaccurate. According to the accurate data presented by Christopher Mathias, nearly 80% of stops were blacks and Latinos and 13% of them were whites yet, “a weapon was found in only 1.8 percent of blacks and Latinos frisked, as compared to a weapon being found in 3.8 percent of whites frisked.” Over 70% of the stops were blacks and Latinos and still whites had a higher percentage of carrying a weapon, which is over 50% of the cause for…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Antonio Reynoso states, “All that we are asking is that we improve relationships. When people know their rights or feel that things are happening by procedure, there’s a level of accountability and respect that’s developed between both parties” (Expert Text Reynoso). Since this bill supports the Fourth Amendment’s right to conduct searches based upon probable cause, there…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These federal laws don’t apply everywhere, two examples of place that they wouldn’t be applied is border patrols at the country’s southwest boundaries as well as airline security. Twenty states don’t have laws against racial profiling because there is no uniform standard for police departments in communities. Profiling is beginning to cause arguments between law enforcement and pedestrians, one main topic is the new stop-and-frisk program. As the program continually increased the amount of fallouts the judge finally deemed the program to disturb the rights of the minority residents. France, is a highly populated area that also has many profiling concerns most concerning Arabs and blacks. These concerns were brought to court where they were then dismissed by a judge in…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "We are eager to finally begin creating real change"(Fox News, 2014). It is important to note people with high political power such as Vincent Warren are advocating of change of the stop and frisk laws, making this topic of the morals behind the stop and frisk laws are wrong, and reform is necessary to protect The Constitutional rights of the people of…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In America there have been multiple tyrannical actions that the government have used on citizens and innocent bystanders. One of these actions are called “Stop and Frisk” which is a prevalent tactic used, especially in New York. “Stop and Frisk” means to be randomly searched by police or high authority when they suspect a bystander is carrying something suspicious. “Stop and Frisk” is a political issue that has been a concern for a long period of time. According to the articles “Growing up with Stop and Frisk” by Sara Maria Glanowski and “Why Stop and Frisk Matters, Even if You Don’t Live in New York” by Andrew Cohen, the cons towards “Stop and Frisk” is clearly stated and relevant. People are being stopped based off racial profiling, while statistics proves that majority of the time, they are innocent. Stop and Frisk must be impermissible and abolished because it is unconstitutional and individuals are stopped based off appearance and not on evidence that proves there guilty.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although racial profiling is legal, it's is unacceptable and very common in society. Racial profiling is defined as, “discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin.” Even though it is said that in America racism is not acceptable, it is practiced on today’s society making it seem acceptable to everyone. As said in the article “Jim Crow Policing” by Bob Herbert, “It is incredible how few of the stops yielded any law enforcement benefit. Contraband, which usually means drugs, was found only in 1.6 percent of the stops of black New Yorkers. For…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of Stop and Frisk has created many problems in today’s society. There are debates over NYC about the policy of stop and frisk. Some people think it’s good for us, but there are others who don’t really appreciate it. People who are against it think that the police are invading their personal space, and even…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A recent troublesome area relates to racial profiling the police practice targeting member of certain racial groups for street questioning or traffic stops on the assumption that members of these groups are likely to be engaged in illegal activities. African Americans and civil rights organizations have complained for years about the practice because police do not need probable cause to stop someone and because it encourages racial discrimination.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frisk, The Court distinguished between a “stop” and an ‘arrest’ and between a “frisk” and a ‘”search.” A frisk was defined as a patting down of outer clothing, whereas a search is an exploration for evidence. Seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interference with an individual’s possession of that property. ( Albanese, J.S, Criminal Justice, 5th edition ,p. 163) So how does the action of these men warrant probable cause? If the strange actions of these men cause suspension, will every police officer stop and frisk everyone because in their opinion they are acting strangely or is it because a certain ethnic group warrants policing more than others. Why does it seems that the rights of prisoners are more upholding than the rights of free…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Racial Profiling

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People of color get pulled over more than white people. Is it because the people of color are all criminals or because the police are getting lazier? people who use racial profiling usually have a negative perception or judgment about African Americans. Racial profiling is a hot subject in the world today. Racial profiling is a fact of life for many Americans today, and I for one think it’s sad. Authors Ahmed Rehab and Randall Kennedy both comment on the negative impact that racial profiling has on society today in America. These authors helped me to see the reason why racial profiling is still used, but at the same time they helped to confirm my position on why racial…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays