Preview

Summary Of Gun And Cars Are Different By Macleod

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Gun And Cars Are Different By Macleod
Would having stricter regulations on guns help reduce death by guns significantly. In Jacob MacLeod's article, “Gun and cars are different”, he goes into depth about why Nicholas Kristof’s article,“Our blind spot about guns” has points about gun regulations that would not work. MacLeod never fully stated if he prefered to have more or less firearm regulations,

but from his article he is leaning towards the more lenient side of regulations. However, MacLeod had agreed with Kristof in some aspect about gun regulations. Other than the few points that they were in agreement with, Macleod gives strong examples for each of kristofs point he had made and why they would not work

MacLeod was in agreement with Kristof with some of his points. MacLeod

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This question is serious because it relates to the public safety. In a 2014 article “ Our Blind Spot About Guns”, Nicholas Kristof argues that there is a need for sensible regulation of guns. He makes his idea credible by comparing the regulation of cars with the regulation of guns.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Gun control has been a major issue in the past few years, and many journalists have written columns and essays in newspapers that are expressing their opinions on the subject. Nicholas Kristof, whom has been writing for newspapers for over ten years, took it upon himself to write Our Blind Spot about Guns for the New York Times in 2014. In his essay, Nicholas argued that if we set laws and regulations on guns the same way that we have done to cars, the amount of deaths caused by guns would decrease dramatically. He uses various statistics and discusses multiple ways that regulations and laws have decreased the amount of deaths caused by cars, and he relates it back to guns in his very well written essay. Nicholas seems to be addressing politicians in his essay, but his overall audience are those who are reading the newspaper.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Q. Wilson writes in " Gun Control Isn't the Answer" about Americans having the right to own guns freely. He states that the rates of death will continue to rise even if there are gun laws. Gun control laws are laws that manage the sales, transfers, and possessions of firearms. In today's society the possessions of guns have skyrocketed through the roof, which is a great reason to have these laws. Contrary to what the author states, gun control is needed because our children are unsafe, homicide rates are rising, and the wrong people have guns.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control laws have been discussed more and more now due to more recent tragedies because of gun violence. James Q. Wilson, previous a professor of Pepperdine University, UCLA, and an author of many public policy books, wrote and editorial letter trying to convince his intended audience that if the government passes more gun control laws it will not decrease the gun violence in America as much as society wants to believe it will. The LA Times published this editorial in 2007 and it is still a good resource.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When president Roosevelt was elected the federal firearms act of 1938 put restriction on guns and ammunition trade, which results in dealers being registered to keep their records. President LBJ introduced a gun reform law that made stricter licensing and registration. He banned the sale of guns to felons and those who are mentally incompetent. The law also had regulations against destructive devices. Both of the laws from each president attempt to control gun laws were a pro. But today, even with those laws passed the world still suffers from someone hands behind a gun is a con. All three articles talks about controlling guns with laws. The pro with making laws against gun control is that the limit of power someone can have to a gun and its decrease violence that involves firearms. The con about that no matter how many laws are enforced people are still going to find a way to their rights to bear arm whether they are using it for the right or wrong reason. Some ideas that could help contribute to the gun laws is more security. When there is public places security and metal detectors should increase since we cannot make people get rid of guns we can be aware of who are carrying…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce violent crimes. Both sides of the issue has opinions, facts and statistics that support their claims. However, I still stand firm in my conviction for stricter guns laws. I believe the pros definitely out weight the cons. Stricter guns laws should include more comprehensive background checks to include gun owners and anyone who has access to the guns, longer waiting periods, and evaluations for mental illness and depression.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chicago Gun Policy

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States has been in a conflicting stance upon the subject of guns, as some people oppose the idea of the government taking away their guns as this act would deny them the second amendment while others have been in favor for eliminating guns from the equation of entirety, as it leads to crime related activity, suicide and mass shootings over the years. The question then arises: Do we need a strict gun policy that allows people to own guns by having certain criteria fulfilled in order to acquire them or eliminate guns completely to avoid any potential disaster? As research suggests, in the United States, guns can be linked to many things like suicide, homicide, and armed robbery among many other things but it is included in studies…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a matter of fact, tougher gun laws will help decrease fatalities. In the article “Change your gun laws, America” by Fareed Zakaria he states that, “In 2008, Japan had just 11 gun homicides. Eleven. Why? Hint: It has very tough gun-control laws.” Zakaria justifies that because of Japan's tough gun laws, they’re capable of minimizing their deaths.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I. Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Newtown are just a few places where mass shootings have happened that have left people forever scarred and unable to forget. Because of these and other incidents, the gun control topic has been in the spotlight. There is no question that guns are a contributor to crimes and murders. However, does restricting and putting limitations on them really help control crime and murders or will this be taking legitimate…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before addressing the viewpoints and the positive and negative effects, understanding what gun control is should be the first step. According to Dictionary.com, Gun Control is, "An effort to fight violent crime by strengthening laws on the ownership of firearms.” Guns are more likely to result in a death, than a knife or other weapons and people own them for the protection of items, hunting, or other reasons (Zimring). While it may be an effort to stop murders and injuries, it will not stop people from…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An argument used many times against gun is that bans on assault weapons and large magazines simply don't work 2). However for many countries around the world this statement is entirely false. In the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and Australia, not only do all of these countries have strict gun laws but they also have the lowest death by gun rates, violent and accidental. In Australia during the 1980's the Prime Minister at the time initiated wide sweep of gun control. Since the 1970s Australia had had thirteen "mass shootings”; in the almost thirty years since the enactment of their gun control reform laws Australia has not had a single mass…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With all the recent mass shootings happening in the country, people have made the call for stricter gun control. Is this really the answer that would solve all the problems? Is stricter gun control really the answer or is it a grand illusion to fool the masses? In these two opposing essays there are very hard hitting points and facts supporting both sides. Stricter gun control is majorly demanded in democratic states where most mass shootings occur. Republican states having open carry laws and CCW are less likely to have mass shootings. Having the right to carry is a basic constitutional right, it's a deterrent, and many times it has saved more lives than taking.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the effects of more gun control would be less shootings. The reasoning behind this is there will be more background checks so that guns will not get in the hands of the wrong people/criminals. Doing more background checks will ensure that people who have a crime record will not be able to purchase guns.Another reason to promote creating stricter gun laws would be because there will be less suicides. Two thirds of deaths in the United States are due to a gun. As mentioned, if there are more thorough background checks then there will be a longer waiting time to purchase your gun. Someone going to purchase a gun with the intent of committing suicide will have to wait longer due to the background check, therefore they will not have a gun while they are thinking about committing suicide. However, there are many reasons as to why having a stricter gun law may be not such a good thing.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays