Preview

Summary Of Startling On Teenage Brains By Paul Thompson

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
194 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Startling On Teenage Brains By Paul Thompson
Paul Thompson in the article “Startling on Teenage Brains” argues that teens should face the consequences just like if an adult did the crime.Thompson supports his claim by first demonstrating the story of 13 year old Nathaniel Brazill who killed his teacher and was accused of second-degree murder. He then explains how the brain gets different systems at a certain age and the reason why teens get very aggressive easily and can't control their actions we have frontal lobes. Lastly the author explains how many people think that teens are not yet adults and that the legal system should not affect them as much. Thompsons purpose is to inform people that the teenagers are not fully aware of their actions so that they don't get punished like if they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Teens are not always aware of the consequences to their actions and they take risks. The general argument made by Richard A. Serrano in his work, Young killers serving life without parole may get chance at freedom, is that juveniles who commit heinous crimes are not fully aware of their actions. More specifically, Serrano argues that juveniles are not fully matured and juveniles should not be charged as adults. The author asserts, “Adolescents, because of their immaturity, should not be deemed as culpable as adults…”(Serrano). In this passage, Serrano is suggesting that immaturity leads teens to act inappropriate for their age because they have not yet become adults. Serrano also states, “But they also are not innocent children whose crimes…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Precis Paul Thompson in the article, “Startling Finds On Teenage Brains” states that human brain of any young teenager is far from adulthood. Thompson supports his statement by first describing the research they have done on a teenagers and childrens brains. He then explains that Teens have a massive loss of brain tissue and brain cells and connections are being lost in the areas of controlling impulses these frontal lobes inhibit our violent actions (stated in paragraph 7). Thompson’s purpose is to inform the reader that teens brains haven't matured yet so that readers understand that teens don't understand what they're doing. The author writes in a formal for adults.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    n the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” the author was very bias, and only talked about what he believed to be true and right, that teenagers have massive losses of brain tissue in areas of self control which almost is the cause to teenagers impulsive actions and committing crimes. I disagree with the author on this statement for reasoning why teenagers act the way they do, he uses this as an excuse. Teenagers must have always loss brain tissue, and just because they lose some self control, that does not make it okay to go out and kill someone or commit and henious crime. Even with loss of brain tissue teenagers and kids know the difference from right and wrong. All teenagers should know the seriousness of what they have committed,…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The findings on the teenage brain shows how their brain can be a cause of their actions. This gave people an insight on why teenages would commit such crimes. Some argued that due to their actions, they should be tried as any other adult and be sentenced to life in prison. However, they should not be sentenced to life as a teenager due to their brains still being in development as a…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Juveniles under the age of 18 will display lower levels of psychosocial maturity than participants aged 18 or 25” (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 60). Steinberg found in an experiment that by the age of 21 participants appeared to be more stabilized in their judgment, indicating that young people may not reach levels of adult maturity until 21, and are developing skills in this domain mostly in the ages from 16 to 19 (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 59). This is to say that before 21 the brain is not stabilized in judgment, therefore when a young person commits a crime their not capable of judging the consequences of their actions like an adult. Research shows that although juveniles understand that their behaviors are considered wrong, due…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “They’re not acting on impulse”. According to Paul Thompson who wrote the article, “Startling finds on teenage brains”. This discusses the development of the adolescent brain and how teens who commit crimes are doing it out of some sort of peer pressure or naivety. Thompson’s states, “brain cells and connections are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control. These frontal lobes, which inhibit our violent passions, rash actions, and regulate our emotions, are vastly immature throughout the teenage years.” Thompson argues this with the minority group who believe that teens who commit crimes should go to…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    You see people everyday getting different sentences and consequences for the same crimes. This happens because defendants differ when it comes to mentality, past crimes, culpability and blameworthiness. There has been recent brain imaging technology that shows from the “prefrontal cortex to the limbic area, the teenage brain is undergoing dramatic changes during adolescence in ways that affect teens ability to reason, to weigh consequences for their decisions and to delay gratification long enough to make careful short and long term choices.” (Schwartz 2010). MacArthur and his researches concluded that young people under the age of fifteen should never be tried as an…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Acuna was the latest person to be convicted with a death row sentence before the age of 18. In “Kids Are Kids until They Commit Crimes” by Marjie Lundstrom writers about a 12 year-old savagely beated a 6 year-old girl to death, Lionel Tate said he was imitating his world wrestler icon. In April. Nathaniel Braizl was charged with first-degree murder at the age of 14, for shooting an English teacher that didn’t let him say goodbye to two girls on the last day of school. In “Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult trial…” by Greg Krikorian researched that teens are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense in court. In studies shown thousands of Juveniles went to an adult trail when they shouldn’t because of their inability to stand the courts proceeding. In “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson discovers that the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers. The brain is like a puzzle that grows fast at the point of learning skills. Also, that the massive loss of brain tissue happens in teenage years at risk taking, controlling impulses, and self-control. The Supreme Court, adjurors on executing young juveniles as killers and to be convicted as adults. Young juveniles are incompetent on being well behaved as what Krikorian says “Seriously Impaired” or is that just an excuse? But knowing that you took a life is just unimaginable and horrifying. So if you did the crime now you’re going to pay the time. Even though your seriously impaired if you know that then why you take advance of that abuse and commit crimes. If you blame the teens you’re basically blaming the parents for unfit parenting their children. They don’t teach their kids form right or wrong and don’t control their kids. So minors are what so to be punished for what…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “On Punishment and Teen Killers”, Jennifer Jenkins, declared that teens are being tried as adults and sentenced to prison for murder at alarming rates in the united states. Also that a teenager killed a family because he wanted to “see what…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles makes bad decision but it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re all bad, majority of them steal or choose a bad path. Everybody makes mistakes but doesn’t mean they all should get a punishment that makes them suffer for the rest of their life. Researches say “among them the discovery of striking changes taking place during the teen years. These findings have…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A worldwide situation in criminal justice is the youth, who are being tried as adults for their wrongdoings. Although juveniles commit heinous crimes such as robbery, murder, or even rape, they are not mature enough to understand what they are doing. In the article “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” a 12-year-old boy got sentenced life in prison after he beat a 6- year-old girl to her death (Lundstrom). The boy did not know the girl was going to die because he is not mature enough to know what his actions will do. These consequences should not apply to the youth because their minds are not fully developed like the adults. Because kids like to play around with each other “Now fourteen and convicted as an adult of first-degree murder, Tate…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many juveniles in the United States are being tried as adults. “Age can shape every aspect of a capital case,”(54) stated Adam Liptak in” Supreme Court to Rule on Executing Youth Killers”. Teenagers as well as kids have the ability to commit an adult crime. In the Article “A Portrait of a Child Who Murdered” by Gitta Sereny ten year old Mary Bell murdered her friend’s eight year old brother and skinned his genital area with a pair of scissors. She then abandoned his body by a brick wall and covered him with leaves and branches. Youth and kids commit crimes, do to the way they think, what they watch on TV, read in books and the internet.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brain is not fully developed . In the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” posted on the Sacramento Bee on May 25,2001 by Paul Thompson, he points out that “brain cells and connections in the teenage brain are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses ,risk taking and self control”. The fact that teenagers are losing brain cells responsible for their self control makes them vulnerable to making bad choices.Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brain is not fully developed like an adult…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, Thompson justifies the massive loss of brain tissue during adolescent’s years; they are still under development and shouldn’t be evaluated as a whole (Thompson, 2001). Jennifer Jenkins in her article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” asserts that she does not accept the “underdeveloped brain” argument, because she solemnly believes that if that were the reason, then teens would all have the urge to kill at roughly identical rates all over the world .Her argumentative opinion is hasty generalizing since she is presuming that all teenagers are alike and will be tempted to commit murder. Brains grow and change at different paces according to Thompson’s research group at the University of California, Los Angeles were they have developed technology to map the patterns of brain in individual children and teens…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive development research from Paul Thompson at the University of California shows that during the teenage years “brain cells relating to impulse control, risk taking, and self control are being lost at a rate of one to two percent per year.”(Startling Finds on Teenage Brains) This means that juvenile criminals are often influenced by factors outside of his control and will eventually be rid of the factor that influenced them into doing crime. This simply means that biologically “teens are not yet adults and the legal system should not treat them as such.” (Startling Finds on Teenage Brains) If teens can be proven be to biologically different in regards to impulse and emotion control then why are they treated the same in the eyes of the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays