Surviving In A Life-Or-Death Situation

You are in a life-or-death situation with your friend, but only one person has a chance of surviving the situation, what will you do in that situation? Would you sacrifice yourself for your friend or would you let your friend die? Consequently, should people be held accountable if they were in a life-or-death situation, they should be held accountable for their actions. Therefore, people that have a lack of judgment, will suffer from survivor guilt, and don’t want to pay the cost of rescues should be held accountable for their actions.

To begin with, life-or-death situations are caused by people that lack judgment skills and a lack of training. Lack of training and lack of skills is very common, even in places where there could be possible life-or-death situations, such as in Alaska.“Today...people,including most Alaskans, live in urban environments and grow up in an urban culture, wilderness skills are never learned.” (A quote from, “Survival Is Your Own Responsibility”). Nowadays, people rely on electronic communication to get
People will argue this because what if this wasn’t one of their best days, with bad luck, and accidentally wound themselves in a life-or-death situation. Such as, “Some people wind themselves up in trouble because of bad luck…” (A quote from The Cost of Survival). People will also argue that what if the price for being rescued isn’t that expensive. Such as, “We’re out here to save lives. You can’t put a price on that.” And, “...taxpayers cover the cost of the rescue for those who put themselves at risk.” (Both quotes from The Cost of Survival). I can understand why people may argue this, but other people whose choices were dangerous and their reckless behavior, will have to pay for being rescued. Such as, “...hikers who get lost or injured because of reckless behavior can be billed for rescue services.” (A quote from The Cost of