Should the first amendment protect Bryon tattoos? The first amendment states,” Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (“U.S. Constitution”) In my opinion everyone is free …show more content…
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Ben Franklin) Do you want to live in a jail? It is really safe in a jail cell, but you have no right so is that what you are asking for? Or do you want things in US to be like how things are in Syria. Back in 1960 Syria was consider a free country, but when Hafez al-Assad ruled Syria he stared saying that we need more safety in this country, so he started passing new laws that weren’t that important. People didn’t pay any attention to what he was doing. They thought it was for the good of the county, but it wasn’t. Laws were passed just to protect the government. Anyone who dares to talk about the government was either thrown in jail or sentenced to death, and that is why Syria is now in a civil war. Did Syria get any safer by passing these law? Like ben franklin said they did not get neither liberty nor