This gives her the ability to pull over the driver if not for any other reason but because of the fact that she thought the “vehicle code” had been violated, depending on what the state entails is a violation. After the officer pulled over the gold Pontiac she had reasonable doubt that the car had been the suspected car of a road side killing of an officer so according to (Hull Street Law) (In Arizona v. Johnson, (2009), the court stated that once a law enforcement officer has conducted a valid traffic stop, the officer is justified in conducting a frisk of the person for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects that the person stopped is armed and dangerous. (Roberts,
This gives her the ability to pull over the driver if not for any other reason but because of the fact that she thought the “vehicle code” had been violated, depending on what the state entails is a violation. After the officer pulled over the gold Pontiac she had reasonable doubt that the car had been the suspected car of a road side killing of an officer so according to (Hull Street Law) (In Arizona v. Johnson, (2009), the court stated that once a law enforcement officer has conducted a valid traffic stop, the officer is justified in conducting a frisk of the person for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects that the person stopped is armed and dangerous. (Roberts,