I read through several documents looking for specific accounts that favored my points of strength, mentality, and bonding. It was difficult to find information that on male bonding. However, I was able to find one review that focused on the multiple sections of the novel. I feel that these additional sources helped to support my original arguments. I did have find three, because one of my original sources was not peer reviewed. Therefore, I feel that my arguments are more valid, because of these additional sources. I also included the Pollock information in the introduction, which was something that I lacked in the first draft. I used the original feedback to look at mistakes that I had made. There was no was that I was going to “pass up” this free information. I took each suggestion and tried to either fix or enhance comments that were made. My greatest challenge in the corrections was the word “soldier”. I see the letters out of order. So I hope that I corrected them
I read through several documents looking for specific accounts that favored my points of strength, mentality, and bonding. It was difficult to find information that on male bonding. However, I was able to find one review that focused on the multiple sections of the novel. I feel that these additional sources helped to support my original arguments. I did have find three, because one of my original sources was not peer reviewed. Therefore, I feel that my arguments are more valid, because of these additional sources. I also included the Pollock information in the introduction, which was something that I lacked in the first draft. I used the original feedback to look at mistakes that I had made. There was no was that I was going to “pass up” this free information. I took each suggestion and tried to either fix or enhance comments that were made. My greatest challenge in the corrections was the word “soldier”. I see the letters out of order. So I hope that I corrected them