Preview

Trident. Does the United Kingdom Need a Nuclear Deterrent?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1357 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trident. Does the United Kingdom Need a Nuclear Deterrent?
Trident. Does the United Kingdom need a nuclear deterrent?
טריידנט. האם בבריטניה צריך הרתעה גרעינית?
"Трайдент". Ли Соединенное Королевство необходимость ядерного сдерживания?
三叉戟。英國是否需要核威懾力量？

These, are just some of the many languages that we could be speaking, if the UK did not have a deterrent.
Nuclear weapons are generally frowned upon however should the United Kingdom be using Trident as a deterrent or not, considering the current political affairs in Korea and Afghanistan. China, Russia and the United States all have nuclear weapons, so, can we afford nuclear disarmament? I will be discussing the issues related to Trident and why even after Hiroshima and Nagasaki we still have weapons of mass destruction.
Trident is the only nuclear weapon in the United Kingdoms weapons stockpile. It is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) that is launched from nuclear powered submarines (SSBN). The United Kingdom has four nuclear submarines armed with the Trident missiles. Each submarine is limited to carrying eight missiles and forty warheads, due to the 2010 Strategic Defence Review. The Trident missile was first developed by Lockheed Martin Space Systems in the United States of America for the Cold War period, so why are we using technology from 1991? The reason being that the technology was so advanced, that it has not needed to be redeveloped. Trident works, as a machine and as a deterrent.
The SNP want to cut the Trident programme as it will cost £100billion to replace, The Green Party also want to cut the programme because of the United Kingdoms current economic difficulties. Scottish Solidarity is also opposing Trident because of the economic climate. The coalition government however has realised that the United Kingdom needs a deterrent if it is to keep superiority over countries like France and Germany who have ever expanding military forces. The Royal Navy once had the largest navy by far, now it has the same number of ships as the German Navy


References: http://www.CNDUK.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/ http://www.scottishgreens.org.uk/ http://www.scottishsocialistparty.org/ http://www.snp.org/home/ http://www.new.solidarityscotland.org/ http://www.tridentploughshares.org/ Quote taken from; http://www.CNDUK.org/
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain the possible impacts on UK energy security of the trends shown. (10)
    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain the possible impacts on UK energy security of the trends shown. (10)

    There are further issues implied by the trend shown for nuclear power. The use of nuclear power has fluctuated in the past 60 years, rising by 10 million tonnes between 1970 and 1990, and then decreasing back 10 million tonnes by 2030. This is because the first stations in operation at 1990 had a short life and are now beginning to expire. This poses an issue for energy security in the UK as even with immediate investment into nuclear energy; the stations take 15-20 years to build. This leaves a gap as shown in the trend (nuclear only at 10 million tonnes in 2030) where the UK will be without nuclear power, irrelevant of…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06
    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U.S World History 05.06

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trident Submarine Case Study
    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Trident Submarine Case Study

    In the fall of 1971, as President Nixon was attempting to convince The Soviet Union to include submarines and ballistic missiles in the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT), the US Navy was planning on introducing a new class of submarines called the Trident. The Trident submarines were to succeed the Polaris submarines, which was developed in the 1950s. The Trident submarines were not only physically larger than the Polaris submarines, they also possessed revolutionary propulsion components and weaponry. If the US could successfully launch the Trident program, Nixon felt it would generate progress in SALT by demonstrating the United States’ commitment to strategic submarines and missiles. However, if the Trident program was unable to deliver, Nixon would consider revamping the Polaris class, which could halt the Trident program indefinitely.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scare
    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scare

    Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The United States Responsible For Pursuing Nuclear Proliferation?
    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is The United States Responsible For Pursuing Nuclear Proliferation?

    Yet, as years have gone since the US first developed a functioning nuclear weapon, the reasons for stockpiling nuclear warheads have begun to contain more of a domestic factor, and a normative factor to go with the clear initial security…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Proliferation Argumentative Analysis
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nuclear Proliferation Argumentative Analysis

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war
    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pro nuclear war

    Should the United States keep and maintain nuclear weapons today? Yes, because without nuclear weapons we would not be able to have the protection we have today since the threat of nuclear war. Which the odds of that happing are very slim since these weapons of mass destruction cause so much damage, but if the U.S where to get rid of the nuclear weapons today that would leave a huge vulnerability slot for us since the other countries would very well keep their nuclear weapons and use them against us. Therefore the United States should keep their nuclear weapons and continue to maintain them just in case of a serious threat required use one.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should United States Make And Test Weapons Of Mass Destruction
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should United States Make And Test Weapons Of Mass Destruction

    The United States should not continue to develop and test weapons of mass destruction because it can kill millions,It's expensive and has lack of morals. On August 6, 1945 Harry S. Truman, had to make a world changing and tough decision. The United States dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb all over Japan,Hiroshima.The explosion destroyed 90% of the city and very quickly killed about 80,000 people and later on because of radiation exposure , 10,000 people died. The United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s harmful, costs a lot, and has flaws.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Do You Agree With This Statement Concerning Britain 1951 To 1964
    • 585 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To What Extent Do You Agree With This Statement Concerning Britain 1951 To 1964

    The retreat from empire created an idea to some that Britain was no longer as powerful as it once was and no longer a world power. This viewpoint can be supported in a number of different ways. One of them being the British desire to have the independent nuclear deterrent. British opinion was very split over this matter, not only the public but also the government. The decision split Labour party but generally pleased the conservatives. Attlee’s government decided that we needed nuclear weapons despite the cost. Historians claim few factors that fuelled this decision. Firstly being as Britain needed something to account for its loss of empire to reinforce the idea that Britain is still a world power and nuclear weapons was a good way to reflect this image – specially as they were so scarce at this time and Britain ended up 3rd to get their hands on the nuclear deterrent, behind Soviet Union and the USA. In 1951, Britain’s first atomic bomb was detonated.…

    • 585 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scotland Persuasive Speech
    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Scotland Persuasive Speech

    Title: Independence – A better and brighter future for Scotland Specific Purpose: To persuade Scottish University students to vote for the “Yes Scotland” campaign. Central Idea: An independent Scotland will lead to a better and brighter future for all Scottish citizens.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Wepons
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Wepons

    I belive that we should own nuclear wepons. Hoever, I also belive that we shouldn't keep wasing millions of trillions of dollars on them. Our country is very loved, but aslo very hated. With these weapons we can keep us safer and also we can help keep allies safer with advanced weapons. With the amount of nuclear weapons we do have we could blow up the world. It would only take roughly around 200 of these bombs to destroy the largest county in the wrold which is Russia. With the creation of the nukes comes the threat of using them. Only two nuclear weapons have actully been used, both being by the United States during WWII on the Japanesse. After we dropped these bombs we sent shockwaves through the counties, and a new trend of havin nuclear weapns began. Shotly aftermany counties began designing, and making bombs.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay.
    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay.

    Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as:…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    States Ought Not Possess Nuclear Weapons Essay
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    States Ought Not Possess Nuclear Weapons Essay

    There are numerous documented cases of safety mechanisms failing on nuclear weapons, very nearly causing nuclear launches. New proliferating states often have crude security measures and are not as advanced as established nuclear powers, increasing the chance of an accident. Moreover, some nuclear programs are also secretive, decreasing the transparency and ability for groups to scrutinize and criticize the process. Instead of risking a potentially catastrophic accident, nuclear weapons should simply be…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Weapon Controversy
    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nuclear Weapon Controversy

    The question of whether countries should have nuclear weapons or be able to test them is a very controversial topic among the public. "A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion." (Vicky: "Nuclear Weapon"). The destructive atomic bomb is an example of a nuclear weapon. The United States used the atomic bomb to destroy the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan in 1885, which killed nearly 250,000 people and virtually ended World War II. There are also other nuclear weapons that are used and tested by several other militaries around the world. Since the atomic bombs hit Japan in 1885, two thousand nuclear weapons have been detonated for testing purposes. If nuclear weapons are so destructive, then why are they being used in the military or even on innocent people? Nuclear weapons should be banned to insure safety and peace within our planet.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Do You Think The Ballistic Missile Is A Good Idea?
    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do You Think The Ballistic Missile Is A Good Idea?

    Answering this question the first thing which come into our mind is that “Ballistic missile” what is ballistic missile….?…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics