Blaming video games for real world violence has been an honored tradition for the past few years. It has gotten to the point where the people pointing fingers neglect to take any personal accountability. Parents simply want someone to blame for their own children’s violent behavior. Video games are an obvious scapegoat, but what they forget is that someone has to buy the video games. There is also the little known fact that youth violence is down. Furthermore, video games are a reflection of the world surrounding us. This leads to the question, how does a group of pixels lead to violence and murder? The answer: It doesn’t.
To begin, Parents have the tendency to search for an external force to blame when tragedy strikes. It is much easier than taking some responsibility for …show more content…
Video games can only reflect cultures that already exist. The author of the article “Violent Video Games Are Not Linked to Real World Violence”, Torrey Meeks, confirms this with the following assertion “On that basis, video games say something about our culture; they don't make culture.” According to “Violent Video Games Are Not Linked to Real World Violence”, video games are a form of art which can address current issues of concern. This is touched upon when Keith Feinstein states, "I was frightened to death back then, and Missile Command was a perfect reflection of that. It turned everyone's attention to the issue.” The gritty nature that some video games choose to showcase, is merely a reflection of the real world. People are murdered, sometimes with brutality and for no good reason, this has been a fact before video games were a thought. When a video game highlights this, it isn’t a matter of wanting to badly influence the youth, it’s a matter of divulging truth to the common