Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Was Religion the Cause of the English Civil War?

Good Essays
587 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Religion the Cause of the English Civil War?
Was religion the cause of the English civil war?

Religion was one of the causes of the civil war between crown and Parliament. However, the war was also caused over arguments about tax and divine right.

The status of the monarchy started to decline under the reign of James I. James was a firm believer in the divine right of Kings. This was a belief that he was appointed by God to rule the country and that God could never do wrong, so neither could he. James expected Parliament to do what he wanted; he did not expect them to argue.

One major advantage Parliament had over James was that they had money and James was short of it. James and Parliament continuously argued over tax. Parliament told him he could not collect it without permission. James suspended Parliament in 1611. His friends were used to run the country and in return were rewarded with titles. This caused offence to many MP’s, which believed it was their job to run the country.

James recalled Parliament in 1621 to discuss the future marriage of his son, Charles, to a Spanish princess. Parliament was outraged. If this marriage happened, would the children be brought up as Catholics? Fortunately, the marriage never took place, but the relationship between Parliament and King was never mended by the time James died in 1625. This was one way religion caused the civil war.

Charles had a very different personality to James. He was conceited, arrogant and also a strong believer in the divine right of Kings. He’d seen the damage between Parliament and his father, but blamed it entirely on Parliament because a King appointed by God could not be wrong.

From 1625 to 1629, Charles argued with Parliament over many issues, but money and religion were the most common cause of argument.

Charles ruled by using the Court of Star Chamber. To gain money, everyone was fined heavily. Rich men were often persuaded to buy titles and if they didn’t they would be fined the same amount as the title would’ve cost!

Charles ordered that everyone in the country should pay Ship Money, a tax paid by coastal towns and villages for the upkeep of the navy. Only coastal areas benefited form the navy, yet Charles insisted the whole country benefited from it so everyone had to pay the tax. This was one way tax caused the civil war.

Charles also clashed with the Scots by ordering they should use a new prayer book. This angered the Scots so much they invaded England. As Charles was short of money to fight the Scots, he recalled Parliament, as they were the only people with the money to fight a war and had the authority to collect extra money.

In return, Parliament ordered that the Court of Star Chamber closed and that the earl of Strafford, one of the Kings top advisors, be executed, to show power.

The relations between King and Parliament were not going well and by 1642, the King sent soldiers to Parliament to arrest his biggest critics but they had already fled to London. Just six days after, Charles realized a civil war could not be avoided.

As I have shown, religion was not the only cause of the civil war. I think the main reason for it was the divine right of Kings because if the King didn’t believe in it he wouldn’t have had many of those views and the whole civil war could have been prevented.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    James I was an absolutist ruler who emphasized the divine right of kings and sought to restrain Parliament under his will. Consequently, conflicts were inevitable as James I, and ensuing rulers, often found himself deficient of funds, and Parliament served as the gateway to the money. James I and his successor Charles I called Parliamentary meetings solely to ascertain the issue of funds. During this period, Parliament was rarely called upon and after these debates for money, Charles I and James I completely dissolved the Parliament. I did so because he agreed to admit the illegality of his taxes in turn for funding from Parliament. Afterwards, he abolished the Parliament to pursue his own endeavors. Furthermore, during Charles tenure, the English Civil War took place as a result from the lack of amity between Charles and Parliament. The Scottish invaded England, but Parliament refused to allow Charles to raise an army, because they feared he would abuse his powers and assail English citizens who opposed him. Charles I was eventually defeated and executed by Oliver Cromwell. Following the inadequacy of Cromwell, Charles II rose to power and was keyed the "merry monarch" for his easy-going nature. He imposed the Cabal system, a group of five individuals who handled the political issues of England; the term Cabal stems from the initials of each official member. This system acted as a type of Parliament in its methods of governing. During this period as a whole, it is evident that Parliament often conflicted with the ideals of the ruling monarch.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap American History Dbq

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 1630 's, there was a religious civil war. This war was between the Puritans, also known as the Protestants, and the Cavaliers, also known as the Catholics. This relgious war lasted from the year 1642 until the year of 1651. During this time, King Charles I was the monarch of England. His father, James I was ruler prior. James did not change anything about England after Queen Elizabeth 's death. He did not change the government, nor the religion. Unlike his father, Charles believed that Catholicism must be enforced in England. Because of Charles and his changing of religion, the civil war in England took place.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the first things that Charles did once he had removed Parliament from the equation was to end the wars with Spain and France. This would stop him spending unnecessary money, and it would mean that he would not need Parliament to aid him in gaining any more, though he swiftly realised that he needed to find some new sources of income on his own. He went about discovering these using financial antiquarianism i.e. he looked back in history for ways to make money through taxes without creating new Acts of Parliament. One of the most famous of these was 1634 Ship Money. Ship Money was an ancient tax payable by those in coastal communities for their defence. Originally, it was only imposed on these coastal areas, though in 1636, Charles extended it to the whole country, with payment on an annual basis. Ship Money was a big earner – Charles achieved 90% of what he needed through each annual tax. However, opposition to these taxes was growing, and in 1637, and man by the name of John Hampden refused to pay. Hampden was taken to court and ultimately put into jail. This example of rebellion caused the opposition to strengthen even more, with the whole country being aware that it was Charles who imposed these rules. Another…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kings and Queens Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James II inherited the crown in 1685. He practiced being a catholic openly and hired Catholics into high offices and, he would suspend laws on a…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buckingham formed a very close relationship with Charles which many MP’s feared. This close relationship and the amount of power that Buckingham possessed, often led to arguments between the King and Parliament, which eventually led to the king adopting personal rule. Buckingham monopolised Patronage at court, and advancement in Office was only approved with Buckingham support. Many MP’s were suspicious of his close relationship with both Charles 1 and James 1, and despised the fact that they could only gain advancement in the career with his consent. Furthermore Buckingham had arranged the marriage of Charles and Henrietta Maria who was Catholic. Many MP’s thought Buckingham was trying to introduce Catholicism in England, which they thought would threaten the ancient liberties of the Church of England. The king’s protection of Buckingham led to Parliament being dissolved which angered many MPs. In 1626 Parliament attempted to Impeach Buckingham, however the King stopped this by dissolving Parliament which prevented them from passing the subsidies which the King needed. These show how Buckingham’s action caused disputes between the King and Parliament, which eventually led to the king adopting Personal Rule as he thought he could manage without Parliament. However…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Charles the First made some bold moves against parliament, besides not listening to their guidance. Because of his stubbornness, so to speak, a civil war came about between the crown and parliament in 1642 . The Cavaliers defeated the Round head sand King Charles was executed for treason. Due to King Charles the First's stunts, England had to basically start from scratch and give all power to parliament. Which if you actually think about is a good…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion was a major impact on Charles and Parliaments relationship causing major tension in the years 1625-1629; however there were other contributing factors, such as key individuals, finance, foreign policy and Charles’ own personality. Furthermore I do not agree with the statement that religion was the most important factor that caused the breakdown of relations between the crown and Parliament. Instead I believe finance and foreign policy to be the most important factors in the breakdown in relations.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    on its communication with the king and of a fairer rule. Charles however went against this in the…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parliament frq

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James I's belief in "divine right" of kings, which meant God had chosen him to be ruler, led him not to rely on Parliament. Rather than depend on Parliament, James I and his successor, Charles I looked for other ways to acquire funds such as illegally levying taxes. Parliament was rarely called on during this period. In response to Charles illegal taxation, Parliament passed the Petition of Right which stated that, to pass any law the ruler must consent to Parliament. In order to continue ruling without Parliament, Charles used Ship Money to collect taxes as revenue. He might have been able to rule indefinitely without Parliament if not for his religious policies which provoked war with Scotland and forced Charles to call Parliament into session. This session, known as the Long Parliament was determined to limit the power of the king. It resolved that Parliament would meet at least every three years. Parliament later split with Charles I and declared war on him. Both James I and Charles I fought to suppress Parliament during their reigns and claimed absolute power due to the "divine right" of kings.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion was a huge part of 17th century England, and can be seen as one of the highest contributing factors to the civil war. Most of the country consisted of Protestants with a minority of Catholics, however this did not mean there was no friction between the two.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glorious Revolution Causes

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Though the belief of Roman Catholicism was infamous, the king James II attempted to redefine it. He tried to make it the state religion of the country. He was in favor of the Catholics so always tried to give more privileges to them. His ‘dispensing power’ of ruling was the indication of that. He had the authority to renew or repeal any parliamentary act. Therefore, he issued a proclamation was rejected by the parliament because that clearly visualized his tyrannical…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third cause related to religion, was in 1637 when Charles demanded that the new English Prayer Book be used in Scottish Churches. This was a big mistake because the Scots were more anti Catholic than the English and many of them were Puritan. This was going to increase the chances of war a big amount. There were riots in Scotland against the new book and Charles was forced to raise an army to fight against the Scots. The English army was defeated by the Scots.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays