Preview

Was The Us Justified In Going To War With Mexico

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
833 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was The Us Justified In Going To War With Mexico
Texas became the 28th state of The United States of America in February of 1845, by the process of annexation. The president of The United States at the time was James K. Polk. However, Mexico believed that Texas belonged to them, and so did the United States. The two sides ended up going up against each other to what is considered by Americans to be “The Mexican-American War”, and is considered by Mexicans to be “The U.S. Invasion.” The war occurred across Texas and Northern Mexico, with 13,283 Americans perishing, and 25,000 Mexicans losing their lives. The US was justified in going to war with Mexico because of the appalling way Mexico was treating the US, and it was also truly Mexico who started the war.
Mexico was treating the United States
…show more content…

land. One thing that shows that Mexico treated American’s awfully was when 16 American men were wounded or killed by Mexicans while exploring American soil. James K. Polk, the 11th president of the United States, and current president at the time stated that the troops were at the border of the Rio del Norte, “to ascertain whether the Mexican troops had crossed, or were preparing to cross, the river...” (Polk, 10). The American troops never crossed the Rio del Norte into Mexican territory, they were always on American soil. All the poor American soldiers were doing on that dreadful April 24th was checking their own land for a Mexican invasion. Another thing that shows how poorly Mexico treated the US was that when Mexico begged Americans to come live in Texas to “Fill up their land”, the Mexican government forced Americans to pay unfair taxes. If Mexico really wanted the American citizens to fill land rather than to just make money, they would not have enforced taxation, they wouldn’t have forced a burden on someone they were seeking help from. Also the Mexican government …show more content…

First, If the Mexican’s were not invading the US in the first place they would not have shot at all the American soldiers, and they could not have been shooting in self-defense, for it was they who shot first, and they were not on their own land. One piece of evidence that shows that Mexico started the war was actually spoken by a Mexican himself, Jesus Velasco-Marquez, a modern-day professor of international studies at the Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico. He said, “When the Mexican government learned of the treaty signed between Texas and the US in April 1844, it... would consider such an act a declaration of war.” (Velasco-Marquez, 12) By stating his Mexican opinion, Velasco was saying that even though it was the US and Texas who signed the annexation treaty, it was Mexico who considered the signing a declaration of war, not the US. The US was only hoping to gain another state by signing the treaty, they weren’t even looking for a war. Another piece of evidence that shows that it was really Mexico who started the war, was the fact that Mexico sent troops into the land between the Rio del Norte and The Nueces River, which was invading the United States, and ultimately led to both the battle of Palo Alto, and the battle of Resaca de la palma. Furthermore, Mexico may claim that the Mexican-American War was really “The US Invasion”, but it was Mexico who started the war, so their title really makes no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The historical relationship between the Texas government in the US government is the people of Texas really didn't want to join the United States. When Texas finally joined the United States the U.S didn't respect land agreements and were taking the Texans land. Then Mexico doesn't agree with the deal Santa Ana had made with Texas. The United States offers 20 million for Texas but Mexico denies it, which then causes the Mexican-American war which the US dominates most of Mexico's territory. Then Mexico agrees to the deal and signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 1846 which sets the US-Mexico border at the Rio Grande River. Mexico was financially compensated for…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Synthesis Essay

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny, or land stealing? The war against mexico and the us, which took place north of the Rio Grande, broke out May 1846. The land north of the Rio Grande was disputed by the US and Mexico. Because the United States decided to occupy disputed territory Mexico attacked. With that said, is the United States justified in declaring war against Mexico? The United States was not justified in going to war because they deprived Mexico from their land, occupying territory in dispute and it was mexico's territory.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ironically, the cause of the Mexican – American War was due to the politics of the U.S. President at the time, President Tyler. Tyler wanted to achieve a second term in presidency, but his name among the American people was not as well known in contrast to his opponent James K. Polk. President Tyler contemplated ways to make himself a more popular candidate, and came to a conclusion that would essentially foreshadow the coming of the war. He wanted his name to be associated with the thought of “American Expansion”, unfortunately he would never get that chance officially because he lost the election. However, in regards to his loss, he still had a desire to finish is initial plan. He went to Congress and made use of the Joint Resolution for an annexation, instead of a treaty. This will require a two-thirds majority agreement that Tyler did not have. On the last day of his term however, he would send messengers to Texas (which at the time was not a U.S. territory) for the purpose of immediate annexation. This would not sit well with the Mexican nation (Heys) .…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American War Dbq

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The United States was unjustified when going to war with Mexico for multiple reasons. One of the biggest reasons was the expansion of a slavery state. Texas is very large and great for growing cotton, so if the U.S. annexed Texas, a very large slave state would be added. The second reason was that James Polk provoked the war. He was also a big believer in Manifest Destiny. This meant that he wanted to expand the land of the U.S. , and His motto was “54 40 or fight” which meant expanding the U.S. up to the northern boundary of the Oregon territory. If this goal was not achieved, they would go to war to get it.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexico Dbq Analysis

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S had a clear and valid reason on why they needed to move into Mexico. Mexico, essentially, invited Americans to live in the province of Texas, which turned out to be a bad idea in the end. So, was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? The answer to that question would be yes, the U.S was justified in going to war with Mexico because their population was overgrowing and they needed more land, their economic depressions made people want to live in frontier areas, and living in frontier areas would create many new opportunities for commerce and self-advancement.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? This question is hard to answer as there were many reasons on both sides of the argument. However, in my opinion, the answer would be no.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American war stared in 1821 after Mexico won its independence from Spain, thus allowing American settlers to move into the newly unoccupied territory. The Victorians of the war, were the Americans. After the war came to an end, Mexico signed the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo. In the treaty Mexico agreed to give 500,000mi to the U.S., while the united states paid Mexico $15 million. There are many different point of views towards the Mexican-American war. The United states was not justified by going to war with Mexico because, they fought for what belonged to Mexico in the first place. And they used the belief of Manifest Destiny to overspread our country ignorantly.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on February 2nd, 1848, signified the official end of a two year war between United States and Mexico through the United States’ terms of concealed exploitation on the susceptible Mexican people. America’s invasion of Mexico combined with their exploitative terms on Mexico significantly impacted every life aspect of the Mexican individual from their land, their rights as citizens and their downgraded ownership over their land. Under the first condition of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the Mexican people lost half their land to American invaders. Takaki states “In the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexico accepted the Rio Grande as the Texas border and ceded the Southwest territories to the United…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Going to war with Mexico was not justifiable for multiple reasons. First, and foremost, the primary reason war was not justified, nor warranted, is because the Americans were on Mexican land that they were originally invited to inhabit. Once Mexico was declared free from Spain in 1821, the Mexican leaders noticed the vacancy of their northern lands. Their strategy to increase the population was to coax American farmers to settle in the Mexican province of Texas. Given that they were invited to share a piece of land, it seems immoral for the Americans to then forcefully take that land by means of war.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of “justified” is having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason. The second definition is declared or made righteous in the sight of God. The war with Mexico was both of these definitions. It was justified. In 1836, Texas had won it’s independence and had become apart of America. Mexico had attacked U.S. soldiers on Texas territory. Polk became president. He believed in Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny was the belief that God wanted America to spread across the continent. Polk wanted to fulfill that destiny and get Texas and California. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because they believed in Manifest Destiny, Texas was already apart of America, and Americans were killed on their own soil by Mexicans.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican war that took half of what Mexico had already like California, Texas, Nevada and Utah was all Mexico's fault in the first place? The Mexican war began on April 25, 1846 and it was all started on a bit of a misunderstanding towards the Mexicans and the U.S as they have both disagreed on the border of each other. One side decided on the Border being El Rio Grande and the other being on the Nueces River. Since The United States decided that the border was on El Rio Grande The U.S road a boat passing their decided border making the Mexicans attack and basically causing the war in the first place.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American War

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “America’s wars have often been controversial” (Roden 317). The Mexican- American War was not an exception to this rule. Many Mexicans felt that they were cheated their land. On the other hand, the US felt it was their destiny to conquer the whole North American continent and Mexico was in the way of their greatness (Roden 317). The belief in Manifest Destiny, that the USA started the conflict, and that the US had no right to Texas are all reasons that the US was not justified in taking about half of Mexico.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays