Preview

What Are The Factors That Led To The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Factors That Led To The Civil War
The Civil War was a very complicated war and had more than one cause. The Fugitive Slave Act, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott decision, John Brown’s Raid, and the election of 1860 were all factors that led to the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 out the Federal government behind slave catchers. This now made the assisting of runaway slaves a federal offence. This also was a problem for free African Americans because if a white slave catcher said that a free African American was a runaway slave and they go to court the Judge would be paid five dollars if the African American was free and ten dollars if he says the free African American was a slave. This angered the North even more which further divided the nation into the North and South. The Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 was put into place by Stephen Douglas. He wanted to win the support of the southern states. The Territory of Nebraska would be split into two territories, Kansas and Nebraska. The issue of slavery would be based on popular sovereignty, repealing the Missouri Compromise. This was an issue because people in Missouri would move west into the territories to vote to make it a slave state. …show more content…
Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. His owner moved to Illinois and set Dred Scott free, but the owner later decided to move back to Missouri and told Dred Scott that him and his family are still his slaves and have to come back to Missouri with him. Dred Scott took the case to court, but the court ruled he was a black slave and not a citizen so he could not sue in a Federal Court. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories and Dred Scott’s long-term residence in a free state does not make him free. The judge said blacks are property and there was no such thing as a slave state. The North was infuriated while the south was pleased with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska act was a proposal by Sen. Stephen A. Douglas which said that Kansas and Nebraska territory could be allowed to govern for itself whether or not to be a slave state or a free state. By a vote of its residents the territories would become a slave or a free state.This caused many fights between Northerners and Southerners. As a result many people were killed.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas & Nebraska Act

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas and Nebraska Act was introduced in 1854 by Senator Stephen A. Douglas. Douglas was a Democrat well liked in the South. He didn’t really care too much about slavery because he was looking toward the development of the new Western country between the Missouri River and California. Specifically, he wanted a transcontinental railroad that went through Chicago, which was his home town. Building this road would involve grants of public land. The south, on the other hand, wanted it to go to the Pacific coast by way of Texas and New Mexico. In order to get southern support he decided to make a bill to create the territories of Kansas and Nebraska.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It meant that the people who lived in the territories would have to decide on the issue of slavery. Instead of creating compromise, the Kansas-Nebraska Act divided the country even further. Slavery, is when people in the 17th century would sell and buy people to work on farms, plantations, work in the house, and work in their factories without pay or reward. Little during slavery, all 13 colonies permitted slavery. If you were a slave during this time and you ran away it wouldn’t be good, the owner would set out a reward and people would hunt you down till they found you and they would either kill you or beat you.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 addressed the enduring issues of slavery and its spread into the new territories of the United States (Compromise of 1850). This was a significant event that took place before the American Civil War. On May 30, 1854, the United States Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which was an important piece of American legislation (Kansas-Nebraska Act). Senator Stephan A. Douglas of Illinois was the main promoter of this act, which was planned to solve the issue of the division of territories in the western part of the nation and the issue of westward expansion. Slavery continued because of racist beliefs imposed by superiors representing African Americans as lower in status and suitable for the roles of slaves.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    States were starting to be admitted into the Union more rapidly and with each addition, there was the debate of whether it would be a slave state or a free state. The Missouri Compromise had been passed in 1820, which stated that new states north of 36°30 ' would be “free” and states south of the same line would be “slave”. Then in 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and gave those settlers the right to choose for themselves if they would allow slavery. This effectively repelled the Missouri Compromise which angered many Americans.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To get the South in his favor, Douglas compromised with the South and introduced an act that would divide the remainder of the unoccupied Louisiana territories into two new territories and would allow each territory to decide whether it would be a slave territory or a free territory. The act passed and became a legal law. Northerners were furious that the act was passed, they believed that the Kansas-Nebraska Act shattered the peace and did not want the decision of whether it was a slave state or free state to be decided by popular sovereignty. Northerners were the opposite of the South in their beliefs and although the North also wanted change, they wanted it to change in a different direction. Although the North did not take as much action as the South, Northerners had many abolition groups and beliefs, and those groups had an immense number of people in them.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Factors

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many different factors that fueled the starting of the Civil War in the United States. The majority of the country thinks that slavery is the sole reason for the Civil War, but there were many other controversies and factors that went on to the beginning of the Civil War. Factors such as literature and different interest groups that were formed also played roles in the starting of the Civil War. Legislation was a crucial factor. There were different compromises and acts established that caused some controversy within the country or specific states.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North industrialist benefitted from the slave structures, but politicians and religious leaders were against it. However, the war between the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    California would enter the Union as a free state. The slave trade, but not slavery itself, would be abolished in the nation’s capital. A stringent new law would allow southerners to reclaim runaway slaves. And the status of slavery in the remaining territories acquired from Mexico would be left to the decision of the local white inhabitants. The United States would also agree to pay off the massive debt Texas had accumulated while independent.”…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott, a former slave, took his case to the Supreme Court. In Dred Scott v. Standard, Scott claimed since he lived in Wisconsin, north of the 36°30 line, he was free. But the Fifth Amendment, which considered slaves property and allowed owners to take property wherever they wished, declared him property. The ruling allowed slavery to legally exist once again throughout the Union, upholding the continuity of a life of slavery for African Americans in both the North and the…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even today 150 years after the civil war scholars that study the era of American history often disagree about the specific causes that led to the beginning of the civil war. However, there are generally five causes that resulted in the southern states seceding from the Union and triggering the American Civil War. Those five causes are the following slavery, states’ rights, sectionalism, territorial crisis, and national elections. I am going to focus on two of the five causes, slavery and sectionalism. Sectionalism it involves this idea that you have competing interests that have different economies, social structures, different customs, and political values.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tensions would continue to rise between the North and South as the United States expanded westward. With the question of whether new states would allow slavery or not. Southern states would argue for the right to decide their laws concerning slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 attempted to form a balance between free and slave states by restricting slavery to certain territories. However, this compromise was only a temporary fix as it wasn’t effective when new territories continued to be added to the Union.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays