Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. His owner moved to Illinois and set Dred Scott free, but the owner later decided to move back to Missouri and told Dred Scott that him and his family are still his slaves and have to come back to Missouri with him. Dred Scott took the case to court, but the court ruled he was a black slave and not a citizen so he could not sue in a Federal Court. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories and Dred Scott’s long-term residence in a free state does not make him free. The judge said blacks are property and there was no such thing as a slave state. The North was infuriated while the south was pleased with the
Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. His owner moved to Illinois and set Dred Scott free, but the owner later decided to move back to Missouri and told Dred Scott that him and his family are still his slaves and have to come back to Missouri with him. Dred Scott took the case to court, but the court ruled he was a black slave and not a citizen so he could not sue in a Federal Court. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories and Dred Scott’s long-term residence in a free state does not make him free. The judge said blacks are property and there was no such thing as a slave state. The North was infuriated while the south was pleased with the