Preview

What Central Powers Should Central Power Be More Powerful Than Federal Power?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Central Powers Should Central Power Be More Powerful Than Federal Power?
The Federalists Papers were made to explain why the central powers should be more powerful than state powers and how the central powers should be the supreme or absolute power, and the Anti-Federalists papers were made to oppose these views and explain why the state powers and the central powers should still have be equal. The response by the Federalists was more persuasive. The Federalists Paper #10 was written by James Madison. The document was titled “The Union Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection”. James Madison believed that central powers should be more powerful than state powers. These beliefs made Madison a Federalist. Federalist Paper #10 James Madison explained “a pure democracy by which I mean a society consisting of a small …show more content…
Madison believed that the faction would protect every person and in effect on how one government power could rule over the whole United States. If there are too many factions only looking after the people in those factions, the supreme power can not get any work done. Anti-Federalist Paper #9 was titled “A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny”. The document started with the words “We the Aristocratic party”. An Aristocrat is a person that is of higher class and society considers them one of the highest orders. The Anti-Federalist Paper #9 explained that having the constitutional power being the supreme powers resembled a tyranny. The Aristocrats believed that the “constitution is calculated to restrain the influence and power of the LOWER CLASS to draw that discrimination we have so long sought after..” and that the Aristocrats rights were above the lower classes. The aristocrats also called names like “yoaking hogs”. When a person in an argument stoops down to the level of name calling, that person has lost the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Federalist No. 10
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Federalist No. 10

    Federalist No. 10 The Federalist Papers where some of the most important essays ever written in the united states, in terms of political papers, because they were used to convince the states to ratify the new constitution. The Federalist Papers No.10 was written by James Madison and is entitled “The Union is a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection” The main purpose of the essay was to illustrate why factions were dangerous to the new government of the United States. Factions are what Madison defines as “groups” of people who have the same interests.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Madison Believe Would Prevent The Unjust Majority
    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Did Madison Believe Would Prevent The Unjust Majority

    Why did Madison believe that the “spirit of party and faction” would have a negative impact on the government? Madison said, “that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties.” This means that a group cannot become too big and cause a distraction among the other group. 4.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    POLS Assignment 1
    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages

    POLS Assignment 1

    The federalist paper #10 is an essay that was written by James Madison and the tenth of The Federalist Papers. It consisted of a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.…

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist No 10 Analysis
    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalist No 10 Analysis

    Federalist No 10 was an essay written by James Madison and published through many news papers along with many others for the decision to have the United States Constitution ratified. Madison believed that the constitution formed a government that was in enough power to do away with the chaos caused by groups of people known as factions. In Madison's terms factions were people who gathered together to protect and promote their special economic interest and political opinions.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    Federalist believed in distributing equal power between the three branches of the government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial), the national government and the states to ensure a firewall that prevented an overreach of power. Madison’s wish was to have a fair…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist 10
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Federalist 10

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    The Federalists believed that a strong central government was needed because of the cruel remarks that were made against America in European courts. (Doc. 1) These remarks led the…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Madison's Response To More Government Power
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is Madison's Response To More Government Power

    In James Madison’s The Federalist 10 and 51, he argues for more government power over the people. He explains that factions might come up and infringe on the rights of other citizens and giving the government more power will help these factions stay under control. He argues that factions or “men of factitious tempers…may by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people…” Madison believed greatly in the powers for the government and we see this where he says “But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” He doesn’t just say to give the government unlimited power but also says that “the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” He argued for more power to the government but also wanted the government to not be corrupt.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis

    “In The Federalist No. 51...James Madison wrote in defense of a proposed national constitution that would establish a structure of checks and balances between the different departments of the government and, as a result, constrain the government’s oppression of the public” (R. Higgs). James Madison advocated for a strong federal government rather than weak government with a strong state government. A strong federal allowed the states to be united with the sacrifice of being government by a powerful few. Anti federalists argued this was similar to the monarchy they had just escaped. Federalists also wanted to ratify the Constitution to protect the rights of the people by constraining the powers of each of the government branches. (Levine and…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eber
    • 873 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eber

    During the time of the newly born America, many disputed over the way the country should be ran. There were those who favored a federalist government and those who opposed it. George Clinton held a very strong position to why he was antifederalist ultimately believing that a weak central government would allow the voice of the people to be heard better while James Madison favored the federalist government because of the capability of equal representation. Although at first glance the positions these two have seem similar, there are very distinctive rationales to why they had to separate opinions.…

    • 873 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics