Preview

What Is Brutus Persuasive Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Brutus Persuasive Speech
The day Julius Caesar was assassinated by the the conspirators, people gathered. The citizens of Rome shouted "We will be satisfied! Let us be satisfied!" They all wanted answers why Caesar was killed. This is when Brutus Started his speech. He made the people believe him with his speech. The people were cheering "Bring him with triumph home unto his house!" "Give him a statue with his ancestors!" as well as "Let him be Caesar!" These are some of the examples of how Brutus got the people of Rome to his side. When Antony goes up on stage people say "'Twere best he speak no harm of Brutus here." "This Caesar was a tyrant." in addition "Nay, that’s certain. We are blest that Rome is rid of him". All of these things were being said while Antony …show more content…
Both of the speeches were persuasive, but there main goals for their speeches were different. Brutus's main goal was trying to persuade the people of Rome that killing Caesar was the only thing to do. Antony used his emotions in his speech. Brutus said that he was ambitious, while Antony proved that he was not by saying "I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?" The people who betrayed him said they did it for the good of Rome. At the end of Antony's speech he says that he found a letter with Caesars seal. All of the people were shouting "The will, the will! We will hear Caesar’s will." Antony wasn't sure to show them the letter, because it might make them angry towards the people that killed Caesar. The people of Rome convinced Antony to show them the will, but Antony asked them to make a circle around Caesar's body. As the people looked at Caesar's body they said "O piteous spectacle!" and "Revenge! About! Seek! Burn! Fire! Kill! Slay! Let not a traitor live!". In the will it says "To every Roman citizen he gives—To every several man—seventy-five drachmas.". It also says in the will that Caesar's gardens and walkways may be enjoyed by everyone. After that the people started a fire and went to get revenge for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Dentex Case

    • 2959 Words
    • 10 Pages

    One of the major issues mentioned in the case is about corporate social responsibility. Dentex Corporation came up with the styling new line of car, Rento. It was considered as a rushed project, thus they skipped preliminary survey. The design was dominated by style different from the other Japanese and European cars, which lead to the placement of fuel tank behind the rear axle (Dentex Corporation, PDF document). The crush test results showed that Rento was less crush resistant and according to Harley Strop, an engineer involved in the crush test mentioned that Rento needed modification before launching (Dentex Corporation, PDF document). The Dentex’s Product Planning Committee and the Vice President, Rodford approved the design and launched it without any modification.…

    • 2959 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony said he would not speak poorly about any of the conspirators, but he found away around it by using repetition (III,ii,84-96). He would question the characteristics of Caesar given from the conspirators to the people. Once he started to get the plebeians to think, he decides to show Julius’s stab wounds through his cloak. Antony tells them how he remembers the first time Caesar wore that cloak. Now, as he tells the story behind it, he has the people’s pity. With the people’s pity, they will beg to hear anything else about the great Caesar. Antony states that he has Caesar’s will with all the items Caesar gave to the great people, but he does not feel it is right to share the words written. The commoners beg until they hear it. Antony can now explain how the conspirators made even more of a mistake (III,ii,241-244;249-254).…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main effect of Shay’s Rebellion was that the states sent delegates to Philadelphia to rewrite the Articles of Confederation because many leaders were frightened, people were upset by the Articles, and they wanted to prevent further rebellions. To begin, the states sent delegates to Philadelphia because Shay’s Rebellion frightened many wealthy leaders by showing them that even a small rebellion could accomplish a lot. These wealthy leaders worried what the poor people could do if they all united, because in the French revolution, the poor rebelled against the wealthy and decapitated them. In addition, Shay’s rebellion showed how unhappy people were with the Articles, which encouraged the states to send delegates to rewrite the Articles in…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both speeches are very reluctant and have a persuasive passion about each topic. Moreover, Brutus's speech is more eloquent than Antony's speech considering it talks about Caesar's honor and his wisdom. Both essays start off with "Romans, countrymen..." (III.ii.13) (III.ii.72) Antony's speech talks more about burying Caesar, instead of praising him like Brutus's speech. Which is why Brutus's speech is more persuasive than Antony's speech because Brutus talks about only great things about Caesar and uplifts his spirit, unlike Antony who downgrades on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony masterfully utilizes pathos, evoking powerful emotions of grief and indignation among the listeners. His repetition of the phrase " But yesterday the word of Caesar might / Have stood against the world" (III, ii, 98-99) stirs the crowd's nostalgia for Caesar's former glory and fosters resentment towards his…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the script Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the characters Antony and Brutus both give the roman citizens a speech. The purpose of the speech is to persuade the citizens to “elect” who is going to be the new leader of Rome. Antony and Brutus both are genuinely strong at manipulating the citizens of Rome. Antony uses pathos and Brutus uses logos, but the speech that had the best effect was Antony’s. Antony was furtively trying to convince the people that Brutus was wrong and Caesar did not deserve to die.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often argued that Antony has the better speech. It is true that Antony did a good job persuading the crowd to go on a rampage. However, Antony is in the wrong, Antony shouldn’t be riling up the crowd to go on a rampage. He should be gathering them as one and uniting them in this time of peril. Brutus had the better speech because he did was right.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony’s funeral speech captured the audience’s attention even after Marcus Brutus had given his argument. His words were precise and well thought out. He not only appealed logically to the citizens of Rome, but emotionally as well. Furthermore, his use of sarcasm was highly effective and persuaded the audience to riot against Brutus even though he appeared like he supported the conspirators side. Brutus’ speech was persuasive of his cause, he even questioned the audience as to taking his own life if what they thought he had done was unjust. The citizens of Rome were ready to accept their new leaders from the argument Brutus had given, but Antony rose to the occasion and made the confused people of Rome realize that what Brutus and the conspirators had done was wrong. Antony did a superior job against Brutus of persuading the citizens that Brutus was guilty of wrongful murder and that Caesar loved them.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analyzing Brutus and Antony's speeches, it is clearly shown that Antony persuaded the crowd better than Brutus had. Both men used very persuasive statements containing many examples of ethos, pathos, and logos. Brutus uses his "nobleness" to persuade the crowd into thinking he has merely done this for the people of Rome. By using the way people look up to him, he told them that they should be thankful that he managed to assassinate Caesar for the good of Rome when they did. So of course the people believe him. Antony on the other hand is so persuasive that he had a speech about mourning over Caesar and by the end of his speech he has the crowd wanting the murder Brutus without him telling them that they should. He uses the most indirect persuasive statements.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetoric

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Shakepeare’s Julius Caesar, there are conspirators who plot to kill Caesar because they perceive his ambition to be negative for Rome. The conspirators were successful in their attempt. The murder of Julius Caesar led to a funeral. At the funeral, there are speeches given by Brutus and Antony. Brutus’ speech was to persuade the people that their action was best. Antony’s speech was better at persuading the people of Rome because of his use of pathos, ethos, and logos.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essentials Of Government

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke built on conventional notions about the role of government and the relationship of the government to the people in proposing a social contract theory of government. The social contract theory is the belief that people are free and equal by natural right, and that this in turn requires that al people give their consent to be governed; espoused by John Locke and was influential in the Declaration of Independence. According to Locke, people form governments largely to preserve life, liberty, property, and to ensure justice.…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays